Measure Twice, Change Once: Using Simulation to Support Change Management in Rural Healthcare Delivery.

Clair Reynolds Kueny, Alex Price, Casey Canfield
{"title":"Measure Twice, Change Once: Using Simulation to Support Change Management in Rural Healthcare Delivery.","authors":"Clair Reynolds Kueny, Alex Price, Casey Canfield","doi":"10.1108/S1474-823120240000022002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Barriers to adequate healthcare in rural areas remain a grand challenge for local healthcare systems. In addition to patients' travel burdens, lack of health insurance, and lower health literacy, rural healthcare systems also experience significant resource shortages, as well as issues with recruitment and retention of healthcare providers, particularly specialists. These factors combined result in complex change management-focused challenges for rural healthcare systems. Change management initiatives are often resource intensive, and in rural health organizations already strapped for resources, it may be particularly risky to embark on change initiatives. One way to address these change management concerns is by leveraging socio-technical simulation models to estimate techno-economic feasibility (e.g., is it technologically feasible, and is it economical?) as well as socio-utility feasibility (e.g., how will the changes be utilized?). We present a framework for how healthcare systems can integrate modeling and simulation techniques from systems engineering into a change management process. Modeling and simulation are particularly useful for investigating the amount of uncertainty about potential outcomes, guiding decision-making that considers different scenarios, and validating theories to determine if they accurately reflect real-life processes. The results of these simulations can be integrated into critical change management recommendations related to developing readiness for change and addressing resistance to change. As part of our integration, we present a case study showcasing how simulation modeling has been used to determine feasibility and potential resistance to change considerations for implementing a mobile radiation oncology unit. Recommendations and implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-823120240000022002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Barriers to adequate healthcare in rural areas remain a grand challenge for local healthcare systems. In addition to patients' travel burdens, lack of health insurance, and lower health literacy, rural healthcare systems also experience significant resource shortages, as well as issues with recruitment and retention of healthcare providers, particularly specialists. These factors combined result in complex change management-focused challenges for rural healthcare systems. Change management initiatives are often resource intensive, and in rural health organizations already strapped for resources, it may be particularly risky to embark on change initiatives. One way to address these change management concerns is by leveraging socio-technical simulation models to estimate techno-economic feasibility (e.g., is it technologically feasible, and is it economical?) as well as socio-utility feasibility (e.g., how will the changes be utilized?). We present a framework for how healthcare systems can integrate modeling and simulation techniques from systems engineering into a change management process. Modeling and simulation are particularly useful for investigating the amount of uncertainty about potential outcomes, guiding decision-making that considers different scenarios, and validating theories to determine if they accurately reflect real-life processes. The results of these simulations can be integrated into critical change management recommendations related to developing readiness for change and addressing resistance to change. As part of our integration, we present a case study showcasing how simulation modeling has been used to determine feasibility and potential resistance to change considerations for implementing a mobile radiation oncology unit. Recommendations and implications are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两次测量,一次改变:利用模拟支持农村医疗服务的变革管理。
农村地区难以获得充分的医疗保健服务仍然是当地医疗保健系统面临的巨大挑战。除了患者的旅行负担、缺乏医疗保险和较低的健康素养之外,农村医疗系统还面临着严重的资源短缺问题,以及医疗服务提供者(尤其是专科医生)的招聘和留用问题。这些因素结合在一起,给农村医疗保健系统带来了以变革管理为重点的复杂挑战。变革管理计划通常需要大量资源,而对于资源已经十分紧张的农村医疗机构来说,开展变革计划的风险可能会特别大。解决这些变革管理问题的方法之一是利用社会-技术模拟模型来估算技术-经济可行性(例如,技术上是否可行,经济上是否合算?我们为医疗保健系统如何将系统工程中的建模与仿真技术融入变革管理流程提出了一个框架。建模和仿真技术尤其适用于调查潜在结果的不确定性、指导考虑不同方案的决策,以及验证理论是否准确反映了现实生活中的流程。这些模拟的结果可以整合到关键的变革管理建议中,这些建议涉及为变革做好准备和应对变革阻力。作为整合的一部分,我们介绍了一个案例研究,展示了如何利用模拟建模来确定实施移动放射肿瘤科的可行性和潜在的变革阻力。并讨论了相关建议和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back to the Future: What Healthcare Organizations Need to Thrive in the Face of Persistent Environmental Uncertainty. Hospital Finances During the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Washington State Hospitals. Examining Knowledge Management and the Culture Change Movement in Long-Term Care: A Study of High-Medicaid-Census Nursing Homes. Innovation Diffusion Across 13 Specialties and Associated Clinician Characteristics. Measure Twice, Change Once: Using Simulation to Support Change Management in Rural Healthcare Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1