Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis: critical gaps in diagnosis and therapy.

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2307503
Juan Carlos Gutiérrez Santana, Victor Rafael Coria Jiménez
{"title":"<i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex in cystic fibrosis: critical gaps in diagnosis and therapy.","authors":"Juan Carlos Gutiérrez Santana, Victor Rafael Coria Jiménez","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2307503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex (<i>Bcc</i>) is a bacterial group with 'natural' multi-antimicrobial resistance. This complex has generated epidemic outbreaks across the world. In people with cystic fibrosis (CF), <i>Bcc</i> can cause severe lung infections that lead to accelerated lung damage, which can be complicated by necrotizing pneumonia accompanied by high fevers, leucocytosis, and bacteraemia, which commonly causes fatal outcomes. Specifically, infection by <i>Burkholderia cenocepacia</i> is considered an exclusion criterion for lung transplantation. The species of <i>Bcc</i> exhibit both genetic and phenotypic hypervariability that complicate their accurate microbiological identification. Automated methods such as MALDI-TOF can err in the determination of species. Their slow growth even in selective agars and the absence of international consensuses on the optimal conditions for their isolation make early diagnosis a difficult challenge to overcome. The absence of correlations between antibiograms and clinical results has resulted in the absence of standardized cut-off values of antimicrobial susceptibility, a fact that brings a latent risk since incorrect antibiotic therapy can induce the selection of more aggressive variants that worsen the clinical picture of the host, added to the absence of a clear therapeutic guide for the eradication of pulmonary infections by <i>Bcc</i> in patients with CF, resulting in frequently ineffective treatments. There is an urgent need to standardize methods and diagnostic tools that would allow an early and accurate diagnosis, as well as to perform clinical studies of the effectiveness of available antibiotics to eradicate <i>Bcc</i> infections, which would allow us to establish standardized therapeutic schemes for <i>Bcc</i>-infected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2307503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a bacterial group with 'natural' multi-antimicrobial resistance. This complex has generated epidemic outbreaks across the world. In people with cystic fibrosis (CF), Bcc can cause severe lung infections that lead to accelerated lung damage, which can be complicated by necrotizing pneumonia accompanied by high fevers, leucocytosis, and bacteraemia, which commonly causes fatal outcomes. Specifically, infection by Burkholderia cenocepacia is considered an exclusion criterion for lung transplantation. The species of Bcc exhibit both genetic and phenotypic hypervariability that complicate their accurate microbiological identification. Automated methods such as MALDI-TOF can err in the determination of species. Their slow growth even in selective agars and the absence of international consensuses on the optimal conditions for their isolation make early diagnosis a difficult challenge to overcome. The absence of correlations between antibiograms and clinical results has resulted in the absence of standardized cut-off values of antimicrobial susceptibility, a fact that brings a latent risk since incorrect antibiotic therapy can induce the selection of more aggressive variants that worsen the clinical picture of the host, added to the absence of a clear therapeutic guide for the eradication of pulmonary infections by Bcc in patients with CF, resulting in frequently ineffective treatments. There is an urgent need to standardize methods and diagnostic tools that would allow an early and accurate diagnosis, as well as to perform clinical studies of the effectiveness of available antibiotics to eradicate Bcc infections, which would allow us to establish standardized therapeutic schemes for Bcc-infected patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
囊性纤维化中的伯克霍尔德氏菌复合体:诊断和治疗方面的关键差距。
伯克霍尔德氏菌复合菌(Bcc)是一种具有 "天然 "多重抗菌素耐药性的细菌。该复合菌群已在全球爆发流行病。在囊性纤维化(CF)患者中,伯克霍尔德氏菌可引起严重的肺部感染,导致肺部加速损伤,进而并发坏死性肺炎,并伴有高烧、白细胞增多和菌血症,通常会造成致命后果。具体来说,伯克霍尔德氏菌感染被视为肺移植的排除标准。伯克霍尔德氏菌的种类在遗传和表型上都表现出高度变异性,这使得对其进行准确的微生物鉴定变得更加复杂。MALDI-TOF 等自动方法在确定物种时可能会出错。它们即使在选择性琼脂中也生长缓慢,而且国际上对分离它们的最佳条件缺乏共识,这使得早期诊断成为一项难以克服的挑战。抗生素图谱与临床结果之间缺乏相关性,导致抗菌药敏感性的标准临界值缺失,这一事实带来了潜在的风险,因为不正确的抗生素治疗会诱发选择更具侵袭性的变种,使宿主的临床症状恶化,此外,在根除CF患者肺部Bcc感染方面缺乏明确的治疗指南,导致治疗经常无效。因此,我们迫切需要统一方法和诊断工具,以便及早做出准确诊断,并对现有抗生素根除Bcc感染的有效性进行临床研究,从而为Bcc感染患者制定标准化的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and genotype distribution among Kazakhstani women with abnormal cervical cytology. Brain-Derived neurotrophic factor and inflammatory biomarkers are unaffected by acute and chronic intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic exposure in geriatric patients: a randomized controlled trial. The association of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with the risk of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis: critical gaps in diagnosis and therapy. From static web to metaverse: reinventing medical education in the post-pandemic era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1