Delirium severity and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Luciana Leal do Rego, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh, Vicente Cés de Souza-Dantas, José Roberto Lapa E Silva, Pedro Póvoa, Rodrigo Bernardo Serafim
{"title":"Delirium severity and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Luciana Leal do Rego, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh, Vicente Cés de Souza-Dantas, José Roberto Lapa E Silva, Pedro Póvoa, Rodrigo Bernardo Serafim","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230170-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of delirium severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients and its association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was performed in two tertiary intensive care units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. COVID-19 patients were evaluated daily during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Confusion Method Assessment for Intensive Care Unit-7 (CAM-ICU-7). Delirium severity was correlated with outcomes and one-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 277 COVID-19 patients included, delirium occurred in 101 (36.5%) during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay, and it was associated with a higher length of intensive care unit stay in days (IQR 13 [7 - 25] versus 6 [4 - 12]; p < 0.001), higher hospital mortality (25.74% versus 5.11%; p < 0.001) and additional higher one-year mortality (5.3% versus 0.6%, p < 0.001). Delirium was classified by CAM-ICU-7 in terms of severity, and higher scores were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (17.86% versus 34.38% versus 38.46%, 95%CI, p value < 0.001). Severe delirium was associated with a higher risk of progression to coma (OR 7.1; 95%CI 1.9 - 31.0; p = 0.005) and to mechanical ventilation (OR 11.09; 95%CI 2.8 - 58.5; p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis, adjusted by severity and frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients admitted with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit, delirium was an independent risk factor for the worst prognosis, including mortality. The delirium severity assessed by the CAM-ICU-7 during the first week in the intensive care unit was associated with poor outcomes, including progression to coma and to mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"35 4","pages":"394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10802771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230170-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of delirium severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients and its association with outcomes.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was performed in two tertiary intensive care units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. COVID-19 patients were evaluated daily during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Confusion Method Assessment for Intensive Care Unit-7 (CAM-ICU-7). Delirium severity was correlated with outcomes and one-year mortality.

Results: Among the 277 COVID-19 patients included, delirium occurred in 101 (36.5%) during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay, and it was associated with a higher length of intensive care unit stay in days (IQR 13 [7 - 25] versus 6 [4 - 12]; p < 0.001), higher hospital mortality (25.74% versus 5.11%; p < 0.001) and additional higher one-year mortality (5.3% versus 0.6%, p < 0.001). Delirium was classified by CAM-ICU-7 in terms of severity, and higher scores were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (17.86% versus 34.38% versus 38.46%, 95%CI, p value < 0.001). Severe delirium was associated with a higher risk of progression to coma (OR 7.1; 95%CI 1.9 - 31.0; p = 0.005) and to mechanical ventilation (OR 11.09; 95%CI 2.8 - 58.5; p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis, adjusted by severity and frailty.

Conclusion: In patients admitted with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit, delirium was an independent risk factor for the worst prognosis, including mortality. The delirium severity assessed by the CAM-ICU-7 during the first week in the intensive care unit was associated with poor outcomes, including progression to coma and to mechanical ventilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 重症患者的谵妄严重程度和预后。
目的研究 COVID-19 重症患者谵妄严重程度的影响及其与预后的关系:这项前瞻性队列研究在巴西里约热内卢的两家三级重症监护病房进行。在COVID-19患者入住重症监护病房的前7天,每天使用里士满躁动镇静量表、重症监护病房意识混乱评估方法(CAM-ICU)和重症监护病房意识混乱评估方法-7(CAM-ICU-7)对其进行评估。谵妄严重程度与疗效和一年死亡率相关:在277例COVID-19患者中,101例(36.5%)患者在重症监护病房住院的前7天出现谵妄,谵妄与重症监护病房住院天数(IQR 13 [7 - 25] 对 6 [4 - 12];P < 0.001)、住院死亡率(25.74% 对 5.11%;P < 0.001)和一年死亡率(5.3% 对 0.6%;P < 0.001)的增加有关。谵妄按 CAM-ICU-7 的严重程度进行分类,得分越高,院内死亡率越高(17.86%对34.38%对38.46%,95%CI,P值<0.001)。经严重程度和虚弱程度调整后,在多变量分析中,严重谵妄与较高的昏迷风险(OR 7.1; 95%CI 1.9 - 31.0; p = 0.005)和机械通气风险(OR 11.09; 95%CI 2.8 - 58.5; p = 0.002)相关:在重症监护室收治的 COVID-19 患者中,谵妄是导致最差预后(包括死亡率)的独立风险因素。在重症监护室的第一周,CAM-ICU-7评估的谵妄严重程度与不良预后有关,包括发展为昏迷和机械通气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1