Cancer screening in people with HIV: Implementation in clinical practice and barriers perceived by medical specialists in Spain

Félix Gutiérrez , Sergio Padilla , Javier García-Abellán , Ana Gutiérrez-Ortiz de la Tabla , Christian Ledesma , Mar Masiá
{"title":"Cancer screening in people with HIV: Implementation in clinical practice and barriers perceived by medical specialists in Spain","authors":"Félix Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Sergio Padilla ,&nbsp;Javier García-Abellán ,&nbsp;Ana Gutiérrez-Ortiz de la Tabla ,&nbsp;Christian Ledesma ,&nbsp;Mar Masiá","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the degree of implementation of cancer screening recommendations in people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A self-administered questionnaire was designed on the strategies used for early detection of the main types of cancer in PLHIV. The survey was distributed electronically to HIV physicians participating in the Spanish CoRIS cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>106 questionnaires were received from 12 different Spanish Autonomous Communities, with an overall response rate among those who accessed the questionnaire of 60.2%. The majority responded that they followed the CPGs recommendations for the early detection of liver (94.3%), cervical (93.2%) and breast (85.8%) cancers. In colorectal and anal cancer, the proportion was 68.9% and 63.2%, and in prostate and lung cancer of 46.2% and 19.8%, respectively. In hospitals with a greater number of beds, a tendency to perform more cancer screening and greater participation of the Infectious Diseases/HIV Services in the screening programmes was observed. Significant differences were observed in the frequency of colorectal and anal cancer screening among the different Autonomous Communities. The most frequent reasons for not performing screening were the scarcity of material and/or human resources and not being aware of what is recommended in the CPGs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There are barriers and opportunities to expand cancer screening programmes in PLHIV, especially in colorectal, anal and lung cancers. It is necessary to allocate resources for the early detection of cancer in PLHIV, but also to disseminate CPGs screening recommendations among medical specialists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"42 10","pages":"Pages 563-569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529993X24000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the degree of implementation of cancer screening recommendations in people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Spain.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was designed on the strategies used for early detection of the main types of cancer in PLHIV. The survey was distributed electronically to HIV physicians participating in the Spanish CoRIS cohort.

Results

106 questionnaires were received from 12 different Spanish Autonomous Communities, with an overall response rate among those who accessed the questionnaire of 60.2%. The majority responded that they followed the CPGs recommendations for the early detection of liver (94.3%), cervical (93.2%) and breast (85.8%) cancers. In colorectal and anal cancer, the proportion was 68.9% and 63.2%, and in prostate and lung cancer of 46.2% and 19.8%, respectively. In hospitals with a greater number of beds, a tendency to perform more cancer screening and greater participation of the Infectious Diseases/HIV Services in the screening programmes was observed. Significant differences were observed in the frequency of colorectal and anal cancer screening among the different Autonomous Communities. The most frequent reasons for not performing screening were the scarcity of material and/or human resources and not being aware of what is recommended in the CPGs.

Conclusions

There are barriers and opportunities to expand cancer screening programmes in PLHIV, especially in colorectal, anal and lung cancers. It is necessary to allocate resources for the early detection of cancer in PLHIV, but also to disseminate CPGs screening recommendations among medical specialists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾滋病病毒感染者的癌症筛查:西班牙临床实践的实施情况和医学专家感知到的障碍。
目的:评估西班牙艾滋病病毒感染者(PLHIV)癌症筛查建议的实施程度:评估西班牙艾滋病病毒感染者(PLHIV)癌症筛查建议的实施程度:方法:设计了一份自填式问卷,内容是艾滋病病毒感染者早期发现主要癌症类型的策略。调查问卷以电子方式分发给参加西班牙 CoRIS 队列的 HIV 医生:共收到来自西班牙 12 个自治区的 106 份调查问卷,访问者的总体回复率为 60.2%。大多数人回答说,他们遵循了 CPGs 对肝癌(94.3%)、宫颈癌(93.2%)和乳腺癌(85.8%)早期检测的建议。大肠癌和肛门癌的比例分别为 68.9% 和 63.2%,前列腺癌和肺癌的比例分别为 46.2% 和 19.8%。在病床数量较多的医院中,有进行更多癌症筛查的趋势,传染病/艾滋病毒服务部门也更多地参与筛查计划。在大肠癌和肛门癌筛查频率方面,不同自治区之间存在显著差异。不进行筛查的最常见原因是缺乏物质和/或人力资源,以及不了解中央防治指南的建议:扩大 PLHIV 癌症筛查计划,尤其是大肠癌、肛门癌和肺癌筛查计划,既有障碍也有机遇。有必要为 PLHIV 的癌症早期检测分配资源,同时也有必要在医疗专家中宣传 CPGs 筛查建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probable breakthrough fungal infection in immunocompromised patient with isolation of an infrequent species. New ST6423 sequence type of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying carbapenemase OXA-48-like causing bacteraemia in an immunocompromised patient. Agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the assessment of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare services utilization among people living with HIV in Catalonia, Spain: A population-based cohort study Cancer screening in people with HIV: Implementation in clinical practice and barriers perceived by medical specialists in Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1