Diving into the divide: a systematic review of cognitive bias-based polarization on social media

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Enterprise Information Management Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1108/jeim-09-2023-0459
Yunfei Xing, Justin Zuopeng Zhang, Veda C. Storey, Alex Koohang
{"title":"Diving into the divide: a systematic review of cognitive bias-based polarization on social media","authors":"Yunfei Xing, Justin Zuopeng Zhang, Veda C. Storey, Alex Koohang","doi":"10.1108/jeim-09-2023-0459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The global prevalence of social media and its potential to cause polarization are highly debated and impactful. The previous literature often assumes that the ideological bias of any media outlet remains static and exogenous to the polarization process. By studying polarization as a whole from an ecosystem approach, the authors aim to identify policies and strategies that can help mitigate the adverse effects of polarization and promote healthier online discourse.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>To investigate online polarization, the authors perform a systematic review and analysis of approximately 400 research articles to explore the connection between cognitive bias and polarization, examining both causal and correlational evidence. The authors extensively evaluate and integrate existing research related to the correlation between online polarization and crucial factors such as public engagement, selective exposure and political democracy. From doing so, the authors then develop a PolarSphere ecosystem that captures and illustrates the process of online polarization formation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors' review uncovers a wide range of associations, including ideological cognition, bias, public participation, misinformation and miscommunication, political democracy, echo chambers and selective exposure, heterogeneity and trust. Although the impact of bias on social media polarization depends on specific environments and internal/external conditions, certain variables exhibit strong associations across multiple contexts. The authors use these observations as a basis from which to construct PolarSphere, an ecosystem of bias-based polarization on social media, to theorize the process of polarization formation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Based on the PolarSphere ecosystem, the authors argue that it is crucial for governments and civil societies to maintain vigilance and invest in further research to gain a deep comprehension of how cognitive bias affects online polarization, which could lead to ways to eliminate polarization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-09-2023-0459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The global prevalence of social media and its potential to cause polarization are highly debated and impactful. The previous literature often assumes that the ideological bias of any media outlet remains static and exogenous to the polarization process. By studying polarization as a whole from an ecosystem approach, the authors aim to identify policies and strategies that can help mitigate the adverse effects of polarization and promote healthier online discourse.

Design/methodology/approach

To investigate online polarization, the authors perform a systematic review and analysis of approximately 400 research articles to explore the connection between cognitive bias and polarization, examining both causal and correlational evidence. The authors extensively evaluate and integrate existing research related to the correlation between online polarization and crucial factors such as public engagement, selective exposure and political democracy. From doing so, the authors then develop a PolarSphere ecosystem that captures and illustrates the process of online polarization formation.

Findings

The authors' review uncovers a wide range of associations, including ideological cognition, bias, public participation, misinformation and miscommunication, political democracy, echo chambers and selective exposure, heterogeneity and trust. Although the impact of bias on social media polarization depends on specific environments and internal/external conditions, certain variables exhibit strong associations across multiple contexts. The authors use these observations as a basis from which to construct PolarSphere, an ecosystem of bias-based polarization on social media, to theorize the process of polarization formation.

Originality/value

Based on the PolarSphere ecosystem, the authors argue that it is crucial for governments and civil societies to maintain vigilance and invest in further research to gain a deep comprehension of how cognitive bias affects online polarization, which could lead to ways to eliminate polarization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潜入鸿沟:对社交媒体上基于认知偏见的两极分化现象进行系统回顾
目的:社交媒体在全球的盛行及其造成两极分化的潜力备受争议和影响。以往的文献通常认为,任何媒体的意识形态偏见都是静态的,与两极分化进程无关。为了研究网络两极分化,作者对大约 400 篇研究文章进行了系统的回顾和分析,探讨了认知偏差与两极分化之间的联系,研究了因果关系和相关证据。作者广泛评估并整合了与网络极化和公众参与、选择性接触和政治民主等关键因素之间的相关性有关的现有研究。在此基础上,作者开发了一个 PolarSphere 生态系统,以捕捉和说明网络极化的形成过程。研究结果作者的综述发现了广泛的关联,包括意识形态认知、偏见、公众参与、错误信息和误传、政治民主、回声室和选择性曝光、异质性和信任。虽然偏见对社交媒体极化的影响取决于具体环境和内部/外部条件,但某些变量在多种情况下都表现出很强的关联性。作者以这些观察结果为基础,构建了社交媒体上基于偏见的极化生态系统 PolarSphere,对极化的形成过程进行了理论分析。原创性/价值基于 PolarSphere 生态系统,作者认为政府和民间社会必须保持警惕并投入进一步的研究,以深入了解认知偏见如何影响网络极化,从而找到消除极化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
期刊最新文献
Capabilities toward adoption of outcome-based contracts Unveiling the dark and scary side of metaverse: an in-depth qualitative investigation Building cybersecurity resilience: integrating defense and recovery investment strategies in an expected resilience framework Assessing the impact of digital service innovation (DSI) on business performance: the mediating effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Organisational cyber resilience: a heuristic for bridging foundations and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1