Aversion to health inequality — Pure, income-related and income-caused

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102856
Matthew Robson , Owen O’Donnell , Tom Van Ourti
{"title":"Aversion to health inequality — Pure, income-related and income-caused","authors":"Matthew Robson ,&nbsp;Owen O’Donnell ,&nbsp;Tom Van Ourti","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We design a novel experiment to identify aversion to pure (univariate) health inequality separately from aversion to income-related and income-caused health inequality. Participants allocate resources to determine health of individuals. Identification comes from random variation in resource productivity and information on income and its causal effect. We gather data (26,286 observations) from a sample of UK adults (n = 337) and estimate pooled and participant-specific social preferences while accounting for noise. The median person has strong aversion to pure health inequality, challenging the health maximisation objective of economic evaluation. Aversion to health inequality is even stronger when it is related to income. However, the median person prioritises health of poorer individuals less than is assumed in the standard measure of income-related health inequality. On average, aversion to that inequality does not become stronger when low income is known to cause ill-health. There is substantial heterogeneity in all three types of inequality aversion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629624000018/pdfft?md5=c739abc03c78906b4e2e9ecad8d513dd&pid=1-s2.0-S0167629624000018-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629624000018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We design a novel experiment to identify aversion to pure (univariate) health inequality separately from aversion to income-related and income-caused health inequality. Participants allocate resources to determine health of individuals. Identification comes from random variation in resource productivity and information on income and its causal effect. We gather data (26,286 observations) from a sample of UK adults (n = 337) and estimate pooled and participant-specific social preferences while accounting for noise. The median person has strong aversion to pure health inequality, challenging the health maximisation objective of economic evaluation. Aversion to health inequality is even stronger when it is related to income. However, the median person prioritises health of poorer individuals less than is assumed in the standard measure of income-related health inequality. On average, aversion to that inequality does not become stronger when low income is known to cause ill-health. There is substantial heterogeneity in all three types of inequality aversion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厌恶健康不平等--纯粹的、与收入有关的和由收入造成的。
我们设计了一个新颖的实验,将对纯粹(单变量)健康不平等的厌恶与对与收入相关和由收入造成的健康不平等的厌恶区分开来。参与者通过分配资源来决定个人的健康状况。识别来自资源生产率的随机变化和收入及其因果效应的信息。我们从英国成年人样本(n = 337)中收集数据(26286 个观测值),并在考虑噪声的情况下估算出集合的和特定参与者的社会偏好。中位数人对纯粹的健康不平等有强烈的厌恶感,这对经济评估的健康最大化目标提出了挑战。当健康不平等与收入相关时,对健康不平等的反感会更强烈。然而,与收入相关的健康不平等的标准衡量标准相比,中位数人对贫困人口健康的优先考虑程度较低。平均而言,当已知低收入会导致健康不佳时,对这种不平等的厌恶并不会变得更强。在所有三种不平等厌恶中都存在着很大的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Harm reduction for addictive consumption: When does it improve health and when does it backfire? The maternal and infant health consequences of restricted access to abortion in the United States The effects of tobacco 21 laws on smoking and vaping: Evidence from panel data and biomarkers The impact of children's access to public health insurance on their cognitive development and behavior Medical ethics and physician motivations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1