Community-based intervention for managing hypertension and diabetes in rural Bangladesh.

IF 3.6 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE Tropical Medicine and Health Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s41182-023-00574-0
Yurie Kobashi, Syed Emdadul Haque, Kayako Sakisaka, Isamu Amir, Megumi Kaneko, Mahmuda Mutahara, Sanzida Mubassara, Abul Kashem, Masaharu Tsubokura
{"title":"Community-based intervention for managing hypertension and diabetes in rural Bangladesh.","authors":"Yurie Kobashi, Syed Emdadul Haque, Kayako Sakisaka, Isamu Amir, Megumi Kaneko, Mahmuda Mutahara, Sanzida Mubassara, Abul Kashem, Masaharu Tsubokura","doi":"10.1186/s41182-023-00574-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 80% of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have been reported in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, studies on the usefulness of educational interventions run by non-healthcare workers in combating NCDs in resource-limited areas in rural parts of LMICs are limited. This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of a community-based simple educational program run by non-healthcare trained staff for several outcomes associated with NCDs in a resource-limited area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six villages in the Narail district in Bangladesh were selected, two each in the first and second intervention and the control groups, in the Narail district in Bangladesh were selected. Pre- and post-intervention survey data were collected. The first intervention group received the \"strong\" educational intervention that included a checklist poster on the wall, phone call messages, personalized advice papers, seminar videos, and face-to-face seminars. The second intervention group received a \"weak\" intervention that included only a checklist poster on the wall in their house. The outcome was the proportion of NCDs and changes in systolic blood pressure and blood sugar level. Confidential fixed-effects logistic regression and multiple linear regression were performed to identify the effectiveness of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 600 participants completed the baseline survey and the follow-up survey. The mean systolic blood pressure reduced by 7.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-9.9) in the first intervention group, 1.9 mm Hg (95% CI - 0.5-4.2) in the second intervention group, and 4.7 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-7.0) in the control group. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the between-group differences in the decline in systolic blood pressure were significant for the first intervention versus control (p = 0.001), but not for the second intervention versus control (p = 0.21). The between-group differences in the reduction in blood glucose after the intervention, were not significant on multiple linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community-based educational interventions for NCDs provided by non-healthcare staff improved the outcomes of hypertension and risk behaviors. Well-designed community-based educational interventions should be frequently implemented to reduce NCDs in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; UMIN000050171) retrospectively registered on January 29, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00574-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 80% of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have been reported in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, studies on the usefulness of educational interventions run by non-healthcare workers in combating NCDs in resource-limited areas in rural parts of LMICs are limited. This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of a community-based simple educational program run by non-healthcare trained staff for several outcomes associated with NCDs in a resource-limited area.

Methods: Six villages in the Narail district in Bangladesh were selected, two each in the first and second intervention and the control groups, in the Narail district in Bangladesh were selected. Pre- and post-intervention survey data were collected. The first intervention group received the "strong" educational intervention that included a checklist poster on the wall, phone call messages, personalized advice papers, seminar videos, and face-to-face seminars. The second intervention group received a "weak" intervention that included only a checklist poster on the wall in their house. The outcome was the proportion of NCDs and changes in systolic blood pressure and blood sugar level. Confidential fixed-effects logistic regression and multiple linear regression were performed to identify the effectiveness of the intervention.

Results: Overall, 600 participants completed the baseline survey and the follow-up survey. The mean systolic blood pressure reduced by 7.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-9.9) in the first intervention group, 1.9 mm Hg (95% CI - 0.5-4.2) in the second intervention group, and 4.7 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-7.0) in the control group. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the between-group differences in the decline in systolic blood pressure were significant for the first intervention versus control (p = 0.001), but not for the second intervention versus control (p = 0.21). The between-group differences in the reduction in blood glucose after the intervention, were not significant on multiple linear regression analysis.

Conclusions: Community-based educational interventions for NCDs provided by non-healthcare staff improved the outcomes of hypertension and risk behaviors. Well-designed community-based educational interventions should be frequently implemented to reduce NCDs in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; UMIN000050171) retrospectively registered on January 29, 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以社区为基础的孟加拉国农村高血压和糖尿病管理干预措施。
背景:据报道,大约 80% 的非传染性疾病(NCDs)发生在中低收入国家(LMICs)。然而,由非医护人员在资源有限的中低收入国家农村地区开展的教育干预对防治非传染性疾病的作用的研究十分有限。本研究旨在确定在资源有限的地区,由非医疗保健培训人员实施的社区简单教育计划对与非传染性疾病相关的几种结果的有效性:方法:在孟加拉国 Narail 地区选择了六个村庄,第一、第二干预组和对照组各两个。收集了干预前和干预后的调查数据。第一干预组接受 "强 "教育干预,包括墙上的检查表海报、电话信息、个性化建议文件、研讨会视频和面对面研讨会。第二干预组接受的是 "弱 "干预,只在家中墙上张贴核对表海报。结果是非传染性疾病的比例以及收缩压和血糖水平的变化。为了确定干预措施的有效性,我们进行了保密固定效应逻辑回归和多元线性回归:共有 600 名参与者完成了基线调查和后续调查。第一干预组的平均收缩压降低了 7.3 毫米汞柱(95% 置信区间 [CI] 4.6-9.9),第二干预组降低了 1.9 毫米汞柱(95% 置信区间 - 0.5-4.2),对照组降低了 4.7 毫米汞柱(95% 置信区间 2.4-7.0)。多元线性回归分析表明,第一次干预与对照组相比,收缩压下降的组间差异显著(P = 0.001),但第二次干预与对照组相比,收缩压下降的组间差异不显著(P = 0.21)。干预后血糖下降的组间差异在多元线性回归分析中不显著:结论:由非医护人员提供的非传染性疾病社区教育干预改善了高血压和危险行为的结果。在中低收入国家的农村地区,应经常实施精心设计的社区教育干预措施,以减少非传染性疾病的发生。试验注册 UMIN临床试验注册中心(UMIN-CTR;UMIN000050171)于2023年1月29日进行了回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends and inequalities in the use of deworming medication during pregnancy in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019. Comments on: prevalence and risk factors for tuberculosis and HIV coinfections in Kenyan prison inmates. Comment on: Fetal femur length and risk of diabetes in adolescence: a prospective cohort study. Reply to: Comment on: Fetal femur length and risk of diabetes in adolescence: a prospective cohort study. Assessment of gestational diabetes mellitus knowledge, attitudes, and practices and associated factors among pregnant women at a district hospital in Coastal Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1