Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1177/15394492231221960
Beth Cheal, Anita Bundy, Ann-Helen Patomella
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data.","authors":"Beth Cheal, Anita Bundy, Ann-Helen Patomella","doi":"10.1177/15394492231221960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On-road assessment is optimal for determining medical fitness-to-drive but unreliable if determined by global pass/fail decisions alone. Occupational therapists need standardized, psychometrically sound on-road scoring procedures. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive) is a promising on-road test developed in Sweden, but it has not been standardized for Australasia. We investigated the psychometric properties and concordance with an on-road decision of data gathered with the Australasian version of P-Drive. P-Drive was administered to older and cognitively impaired drivers (<i>N</i> = 134) aged 18 to 91 years (mean age 68) who were referred to 10 driving clinics in Australia and New Zealand to determine driving performance. Rasch analysis provided evidence for construct validity and concordance of the data gathered. An optimal cut-off score of 85 was set, yielding evidence of good sensitivity at 88% and specificity at 88%. The Australasian version of P-Drive produces valid and reliable data regarding on-road driving performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492231221960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On-road assessment is optimal for determining medical fitness-to-drive but unreliable if determined by global pass/fail decisions alone. Occupational therapists need standardized, psychometrically sound on-road scoring procedures. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive) is a promising on-road test developed in Sweden, but it has not been standardized for Australasia. We investigated the psychometric properties and concordance with an on-road decision of data gathered with the Australasian version of P-Drive. P-Drive was administered to older and cognitively impaired drivers (N = 134) aged 18 to 91 years (mean age 68) who were referred to 10 driving clinics in Australia and New Zealand to determine driving performance. Rasch analysis provided evidence for construct validity and concordance of the data gathered. An optimal cut-off score of 85 was set, yielding evidence of good sensitivity at 88% and specificity at 88%. The Australasian version of P-Drive produces valid and reliable data regarding on-road driving performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驶能力表现分析(P-Drive):调查澳大利亚数据的结构有效性和一致性。
路面评估是确定医学上是否适合驾驶的最佳方法,但如果仅由全局通过/未通过决定,则并不可靠。职业治疗师需要标准化、心理测量学上可靠的道路评分程序。驾驶能力表现分析(P-Drive)是瑞典开发的一种很有前途的道路测试,但尚未在澳大拉西亚实现标准化。我们对使用 P-Drive 澳大拉西亚版收集的数据进行了心理测量特性和与道路决策的一致性研究。我们对澳大利亚和新西兰 10 家驾驶诊所转诊的 18 至 91 岁(平均年龄 68 岁)的老年和认知障碍驾驶员(134 人)进行了 P-Drive,以确定其驾驶表现。拉施分析证明了所收集数据的结构效度和一致性。最佳临界值为 85 分,灵敏度为 88%,特异度为 88%。澳大拉西亚版 P-Drive 可提供有效、可靠的道路驾驶性能数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Comparisons of Occupational Balance Within Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Schizophrenia. Unraveling the "Greener Pastures" Concept: The Phenomenology of Internationally Educated Occupational Therapists. Cognitive Self-Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease. Item-Level Psychometrics of the Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment in Orally Feeding Infants. Changes in Caregiver Burden in Older Adults' Caregivers During the COVID-19 Outbreak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1