Utility of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in evaluating a multicomponent exercise programme for community-dwelling pre-frail older adults.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2023-002410
Juan Fang, Jianping Ren, Jinjing Wang, Xiantao Qiu, Shiyan Zhang, Shuang Yuan, Liangfeng Wu, Lin Xie, Le Yu
{"title":"Utility of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in evaluating a multicomponent exercise programme for community-dwelling pre-frail older adults.","authors":"Juan Fang, Jianping Ren, Jinjing Wang, Xiantao Qiu, Shiyan Zhang, Shuang Yuan, Liangfeng Wu, Lin Xie, Le Yu","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in assessing an intervention for pre-frail senior citizens. Additionally, the study aimed to explain how the GAS goals were established based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories, including body function, activity and participation and environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 220 pre-frail older adults were randomly selected to participate in a controlled trial. The intervention group engaged in multicomponent exercise three times a week, once at a community health service location and twice at home. The control group received advice on physical activity but did not have supervised exercise. Participants in both groups selected individualised GAS goals from 23 goals developed based on ICF by focus group discussion. The study used generalised estimating equations to analyse the differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 144 participants, 72 in the exercise group and 72 in the control group. The top three individualised goals for all participants were vestibular functions (53.5%), pain management (43.1%) and lifting and carrying objects (31.9%). Both groups saw a significant increase in GAS scores at week 8 and week 24 of the intervention (p<0.05), but the exercise group showed a more significant improvement (p<0.05). The participants living alone were associated with lower postintervention improvements in the GAS scores. In contrast, the participants who were using a smartphone were likely to get higher postintervention improvements in the GAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GAS can be a valuable tool for setting and evaluating individualised and meaningful goals in body functions, activity and participation and environmental factors. The multicomponent exercise interventions can help pre-frail older adults achieve their expected goals as measured by the GAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in assessing an intervention for pre-frail senior citizens. Additionally, the study aimed to explain how the GAS goals were established based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories, including body function, activity and participation and environmental factors.

Methods: In this study, 220 pre-frail older adults were randomly selected to participate in a controlled trial. The intervention group engaged in multicomponent exercise three times a week, once at a community health service location and twice at home. The control group received advice on physical activity but did not have supervised exercise. Participants in both groups selected individualised GAS goals from 23 goals developed based on ICF by focus group discussion. The study used generalised estimating equations to analyse the differences between the groups.

Results: The study included 144 participants, 72 in the exercise group and 72 in the control group. The top three individualised goals for all participants were vestibular functions (53.5%), pain management (43.1%) and lifting and carrying objects (31.9%). Both groups saw a significant increase in GAS scores at week 8 and week 24 of the intervention (p<0.05), but the exercise group showed a more significant improvement (p<0.05). The participants living alone were associated with lower postintervention improvements in the GAS scores. In contrast, the participants who were using a smartphone were likely to get higher postintervention improvements in the GAS scores.

Conclusions: GAS can be a valuable tool for setting and evaluating individualised and meaningful goals in body functions, activity and participation and environmental factors. The multicomponent exercise interventions can help pre-frail older adults achieve their expected goals as measured by the GAS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标达成量表(GAS)在评估针对居住在社区的前期体弱老年人的多成分锻炼计划中的实用性。
研究目的本研究旨在调查目标达成量表(GAS)在评估针对前期体弱老年人的干预措施中的有效性。此外,该研究还旨在解释如何根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)类别(包括身体功能、活动和参与以及环境因素)制定 GAS 目标:在这项研究中,随机抽取了 220 名身体虚弱的老年人参加对照试验。干预组每周进行三次多成分锻炼,一次在社区卫生服务机构,两次在家中。对照组接受体育锻炼方面的建议,但不进行有监督的锻炼。两组参与者通过焦点小组讨论,从根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》制定的 23 个目标中选择了个性化的 GAS 目标。研究采用广义估计方程分析了两组之间的差异:研究包括 144 名参与者,其中运动组 72 人,对照组 72 人。所有参与者的前庭功能(53.5%)、疼痛控制(43.1%)以及举起和搬运物品(31.9%)是他们个性化目标的前三位。在干预的第 8 周和第 24 周,两组的 GAS 分数都有了明显提高(p 结论:GAS 可以作为治疗前庭功能障碍的重要工具:GAS 可以作为一种有价值的工具,用于设定和评估身体功能、活动和参与以及环境因素方面的个性化和有意义的目标。多组分运动干预可以帮助身体虚弱的老年人实现 GAS 所衡量的预期目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
The role of the primary healthcare research community in addressing the social and structural determinants of health: a call to action from NAPCRG 2023. Identification of research gaps to improve care for healthy ageing: a scoping review. Temporal trends and practice variation of paediatric diagnostic tests in primary care: retrospective analysis of 14 million tests. General practice trainee, supervisor and educator perspectives on the transitions in postgraduate training: a scoping review. Reducing strain on primary healthcare systems through innovative models of care: the impact of direct access physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions-an interrupted time series analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1