Whole-genome sequencing of Fusarium spp. causing sugarcane root rot on both chewing cane and sugar-making cane.

Xinyang Li, Yuming Ma, Na Zhang, Yiming Li, Zhibin Liang, Yibao Luo, Longxin Lin, Dongliang Zhang, Yongqiang He, Ziting Wang, Zhiquan Zhang, Yizhen Deng
{"title":"Whole-genome sequencing of Fusarium spp. causing sugarcane root rot on both chewing cane and sugar-making cane.","authors":"Xinyang Li, Yuming Ma, Na Zhang, Yiming Li, Zhibin Liang, Yibao Luo, Longxin Lin, Dongliang Zhang, Yongqiang He, Ziting Wang, Zhiquan Zhang, Yizhen Deng","doi":"10.1007/s44154-023-00145-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previously we isolated three Fusarium strains (a F. sacchari strain namely GXUF-1, and another two F. commune strains namely GXUF-2 and GXUF-3), and we verified that GXUF-3 was able to cause sugarcane root rot to the chewing cane cultivar Badila. Considering that Fusarium spp. are a group of widely distributed fungal pathogens, we tested whether these three Fusarium isolates were able to cause root rot to Badila as well as sugar-making cane cultivar (Guitang42), using a suitable inoculation method established based on infection assays using Badila. We found that the three Fusarium strains were able to cause root rot symptoms to both Badila and Guitang42, to different extents. To better investigate the potential pathogenicity mechanisms, we performed Illumina high-throughput sequencing and analyzed the whole genomic sequence data of these three Fusarium strains. The results reveal that the assembly sizes of the three Fusarium strains were in a range of 44.7-48.2 Mb, with G + C contents of 48.0-48.5%, and 14,154-15,175 coding genes. The coding genes were annotated by multiple public databases, and potential pathogenic genes were predicted using proprietary databases (such as PHI, DFVF, CAZy, etc.). Furthermore, based on evolutionary analysis of the coding sequence, we found that contraction and expansion of gene families occurred in the three Fusarium strains. Overall, our results suggest a potential risk that the root rot disease may occur to the sugar-making canes although it was initially spotted from fruit cane, and provide clues to understand the pathogenic mechanisms of Fusarium spp. causing sugarcane root rot.</p>","PeriodicalId":74874,"journal":{"name":"Stress biology","volume":"4 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-023-00145-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previously we isolated three Fusarium strains (a F. sacchari strain namely GXUF-1, and another two F. commune strains namely GXUF-2 and GXUF-3), and we verified that GXUF-3 was able to cause sugarcane root rot to the chewing cane cultivar Badila. Considering that Fusarium spp. are a group of widely distributed fungal pathogens, we tested whether these three Fusarium isolates were able to cause root rot to Badila as well as sugar-making cane cultivar (Guitang42), using a suitable inoculation method established based on infection assays using Badila. We found that the three Fusarium strains were able to cause root rot symptoms to both Badila and Guitang42, to different extents. To better investigate the potential pathogenicity mechanisms, we performed Illumina high-throughput sequencing and analyzed the whole genomic sequence data of these three Fusarium strains. The results reveal that the assembly sizes of the three Fusarium strains were in a range of 44.7-48.2 Mb, with G + C contents of 48.0-48.5%, and 14,154-15,175 coding genes. The coding genes were annotated by multiple public databases, and potential pathogenic genes were predicted using proprietary databases (such as PHI, DFVF, CAZy, etc.). Furthermore, based on evolutionary analysis of the coding sequence, we found that contraction and expansion of gene families occurred in the three Fusarium strains. Overall, our results suggest a potential risk that the root rot disease may occur to the sugar-making canes although it was initially spotted from fruit cane, and provide clues to understand the pathogenic mechanisms of Fusarium spp. causing sugarcane root rot.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对引起咀嚼甘蔗和制糖甘蔗根腐病的镰刀菌属进行全基因组测序。
此前,我们分离了三株镰刀菌(一株 F. sacchari 菌株,即 GXUF-1;另两株 F. commune 菌株,即 GXUF-2 和 GXUF-3),并验证了 GXUF-3 能够引起咀嚼蔗品种 Badila 的甘蔗根腐病。考虑到镰刀菌属是一类广泛分布的真菌病原体,我们根据巴迪拉的感染试验,采用合适的接种方法,测试了这三种镰刀菌分离物是否能引起巴迪拉以及制糖甘蔗栽培品种(桂塘 42)的根腐病。我们发现,这三种镰刀菌株能在不同程度上引起巴迪拉和贵糖 42 的根腐病症状。为了更好地研究潜在的致病机制,我们进行了 Illumina 高通量测序,并分析了这三个镰刀菌株的全基因组序列数据。结果显示,这三个镰刀菌株的基因组大小在 44.7-48.2 Mb 之间,G+C 含量为 48.0-48.5%,编码基因为 14 154-15 175 个。编码基因由多个公共数据库注释,潜在的致病基因则由专有数据库(如 PHI、DFVF、CAZy 等)预测。此外,根据编码序列的进化分析,我们发现三个镰刀菌株中的基因家族发生了收缩和扩展。总之,我们的研究结果表明,虽然根腐病最初是从果蔗中发现的,但它有可能发生在制糖甘蔗上,并为了解镰刀菌属导致甘蔗根腐病的致病机制提供了线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Candidate genes associated with low temperature tolerance in cucumber adult plants identified by combining GWAS & QTL mapping. Novel endophytic fungus Leptosphaeria sp. strain T-2 improves plant growth and environmental stress tolerance. Utilizing effector-triggered immunity (ETI) as a robust priming agent to protect plants from pathogens. CsLAC4, regulated by CsmiR397a, confers drought tolerance to the tea plant by enhancing lignin biosynthesis. Correction: Zinc metalloprotease FgM35, which targets the wheat zinc-binding protein TaZnBP, contributes to the virulence of Fusarium graminearum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1