Two problems or one? Climate engineering and conceptual disaggregation

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2024.100202
Florian Rabitz
{"title":"Two problems or one? Climate engineering and conceptual disaggregation","authors":"Florian Rabitz","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2024.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The term “climate engineering” is an ambiguous label for two categories of technologies for mediating global warming, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and Solar Radiation Modification (SRM). Whether CDR and SRM should be grouped together under a common umbrella term, or whether they should be treated as two disparate problems in need of disparate solutions, has long been a matter of debate. This paper first provides an empirical analysis of disaggregation. Topic modelling the scientific literature on climate engineering, I highlight a trend towards disaggregation driven by growth in the specialized literature on CDR. Second, I explore inconsistencies in the theoretical rationale for disaggregation and challenges in its practical implications. Third, I elaborate on the theoretical and practical utility of maintaining an integrated concept of climate engineering for highlighting the challenges of governing large-scale, hypothetical technological interventions into the climate system subject to deep uncertainties and mitigation deterrence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100202"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000028/pdfft?md5=a3b81210e2062e717a0d6eb6b4811f1e&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811624000028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term “climate engineering” is an ambiguous label for two categories of technologies for mediating global warming, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and Solar Radiation Modification (SRM). Whether CDR and SRM should be grouped together under a common umbrella term, or whether they should be treated as two disparate problems in need of disparate solutions, has long been a matter of debate. This paper first provides an empirical analysis of disaggregation. Topic modelling the scientific literature on climate engineering, I highlight a trend towards disaggregation driven by growth in the specialized literature on CDR. Second, I explore inconsistencies in the theoretical rationale for disaggregation and challenges in its practical implications. Third, I elaborate on the theoretical and practical utility of maintaining an integrated concept of climate engineering for highlighting the challenges of governing large-scale, hypothetical technological interventions into the climate system subject to deep uncertainties and mitigation deterrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个问题还是一个问题?气候工程与概念分解
气候工程 "一词是一个模棱两可的标签,它指的是两类减缓全球变暖的技术,即二氧化碳清除(CDR)和太阳辐射改变(SRM)。长期以来,CDR 和 SRM 是否应归为一个共同的总括术语,还是应将其视为需要不同解决方案的两个不同问题,一直是一个争论不休的问题。本文首先对分类问题进行了实证分析。以气候工程科学文献为主题建模,我强调了由 CDR 专业文献的增长所推动的分类趋势。其次,我探讨了分类理论依据中的不一致之处及其实际影响中的挑战。第三,我阐述了保持气候工程综合概念的理论和实践效用,以突出管理对气候系统进行大规模、假设性技术干预所面临的挑战,这些技术干预受制于深刻的不确定性和减缓威慑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1