Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2026.100313
Chenxi Sun , Qingliu Ren , Xiaolin Liu , Yuejing Ge
This study examines how China and Japan competed to frame the Fukushima water discharge while constructing domestic and international legitimacy. Using a functional framing model and frame-credibility dimensions, we compare strategies: Japan promoted a “Scientific Safety” frame to build technical legitimacy, bolstered by international authority endorsements; China advanced an “Environmental Justice” frame stressing historical accountability, ecological risk, and regional cultural resonance. The confrontation exposed tensions between technical rationality and lived local experience. Internationally, framing moved from a bilateral contest to a multi-level legitimacy struggle and edged toward a tentative, monitoring-based partial accommodation through emerging oversight mechanisms, while deeper conflicts over risk, justice and responsibility remained unresolved. The results enrich theory on framing, legitimacy, and risk governance, and offer practical guidance for bridging technical and cultural claims in global environmental disputes.
{"title":"Framing analysis of Japan and China's response to Fukushima water discharge: Technical rationality vs local experience","authors":"Chenxi Sun , Qingliu Ren , Xiaolin Liu , Yuejing Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100313","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100313","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how China and Japan competed to frame the Fukushima water discharge while constructing domestic and international legitimacy. Using a functional framing model and frame-credibility dimensions, we compare strategies: Japan promoted a “Scientific Safety” frame to build technical legitimacy, bolstered by international authority endorsements; China advanced an “Environmental Justice” frame stressing historical accountability, ecological risk, and regional cultural resonance. The confrontation exposed tensions between technical rationality and lived local experience. Internationally, framing moved from a bilateral contest to a multi-level legitimacy struggle and edged toward a tentative, monitoring-based partial accommodation through emerging oversight mechanisms, while deeper conflicts over risk, justice and responsibility remained unresolved. The results enrich theory on framing, legitimacy, and risk governance, and offer practical guidance for bridging technical and cultural claims in global environmental disputes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100313"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146077549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2026.100314
Peter Dauvergne
Microplastics released as consumers use products are a significant, yet largely unregulated, source of global pollution. Enhancing corporate earth system accountability for this contamination is essential for protecting planetary health. This Perspective develops this argument and identifies governance strategies through a case study of one consumer product: tires. By mass, the chemical-laden particles emitted as tires wear and tear on roads – which scientists typically classify as microplastics – are among the largest sources of global microplastic pollution. Regulations to govern tire abrasion are emerging in California and the European Union, and, as expert interviews reveal, discussions are occurring to develop global standards. Still, regulatory controls remain fragmented and weak, and pollution is escalating. Urging consumers to take responsibility has not helped. Governments need to set stringent international standards, ensure corporate transparency, mandate strong precautionary approaches, extend producer responsibility, and avoid voluntary corporate self-governance as a primary mechanism of accountability.
{"title":"Corporate earth system accountability: Governance strategies to reduce microplastic pollution from consumer products","authors":"Peter Dauvergne","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100314","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100314","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microplastics released as consumers use products are a significant, yet largely unregulated, source of global pollution. Enhancing corporate earth system accountability for this contamination is essential for protecting planetary health. This Perspective develops this argument and identifies governance strategies through a case study of one consumer product: tires. By mass, the chemical-laden particles emitted as tires wear and tear on roads – which scientists typically classify as microplastics – are among the largest sources of global microplastic pollution. Regulations to govern tire abrasion are emerging in California and the European Union, and, as expert interviews reveal, discussions are occurring to develop global standards. Still, regulatory controls remain fragmented and weak, and pollution is escalating. Urging consumers to take responsibility has not helped. Governments need to set stringent international standards, ensure corporate transparency, mandate strong precautionary approaches, extend producer responsibility, and avoid voluntary corporate self-governance as a primary mechanism of accountability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2026.100312
Henrik Selin , Noelle Eckley Selin
Chemical pollution poses significant environmental and human health problems. Some researchers have put forward the planetary boundary framework as a way to contextualize knowledge about Earth system challenges, including chemicals. In this Perspective, we argue that further application of the planetary boundary framework has limited conceptual and practical value for advancing research and policy-making to address environmental and human health risk from chemicals, and may end up having negative unintended consequences for inclusive and effective governance. We present four sets of issues which challenge the application of the planetary boundary framework to chemicals, connected to conceptual inconsistencies, conflicts with established norms and practices on risk and precaution, a limited ability to help protect the most vulnerable, and a lack of legitimacy in political processes. As an alternative, we discuss three ways in which researchers can help advance knowledge and action on chemicals, working with stakeholders through existing policy efforts and treaties.
{"title":"Alternatives to planetary boundaries can enhance science-policy linkages for chemicals governance","authors":"Henrik Selin , Noelle Eckley Selin","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100312","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100312","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chemical pollution poses significant environmental and human health problems. Some researchers have put forward the planetary boundary framework as a way to contextualize knowledge about Earth system challenges, including chemicals. In this Perspective, we argue that further application of the planetary boundary framework has limited conceptual and practical value for advancing research and policy-making to address environmental and human health risk from chemicals, and may end up having negative unintended consequences for inclusive and effective governance. We present four sets of issues which challenge the application of the planetary boundary framework to chemicals, connected to conceptual inconsistencies, conflicts with established norms and practices on risk and precaution, a limited ability to help protect the most vulnerable, and a lack of legitimacy in political processes. As an alternative, we discuss three ways in which researchers can help advance knowledge and action on chemicals, working with stakeholders through existing policy efforts and treaties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Global Stocktake (GST) is designed to be at the heart of the Paris Agreement's ratcheting mechanism towards achieving the Paris goals. It has a mandate to be conducted ‘in the light of equity’ despite being a collective assessment which does not currently facilitate structured comparison of Parties' contributions. Based on a three-part normative framework, this study assesses the extent to which the first GST concluded in 2023 was successfully conducted ‘in the light of equity’ and what can be learned for its future iterations. By triangulating data from participant observation, a survey, and document analysis it finds that despite significant procedural innovations, the GST does not appear to have integrated equity in a substantial manner across all dimensions. Several possible recommendations emerge, including clarifying the mandate to include individual assessment, and making procedural shifts to increase the chances that these assessments make more significant contributions to equity over time.
{"title":"Did the first global Stocktake successfully assess progress towards the Paris goals ‘in light of equity’?","authors":"Sonja Klinsky , Ceecee Holz , Snigdha Nautiyal , Jyotesna Maurya , Aastha Nath , Tom Athanasiou","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100310","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100310","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Global Stocktake (GST) is designed to be at the heart of the Paris Agreement's ratcheting mechanism towards achieving the Paris goals. It has a mandate to be conducted ‘in the light of equity’ despite being a collective assessment which does not currently facilitate structured comparison of Parties' contributions. Based on a three-part normative framework, this study assesses the extent to which the first GST concluded in 2023 was successfully conducted ‘in the light of equity’ and what can be learned for its future iterations. By triangulating data from participant observation, a survey, and document analysis it finds that despite significant procedural innovations, the GST does not appear to have integrated equity in a substantial manner across all dimensions. Several possible recommendations emerge, including clarifying the mandate to include individual assessment, and making procedural shifts to increase the chances that these assessments make more significant contributions to equity over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100310"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2026.100311
Muhamad Amin Rifai , Charline Depoorter , Nunung Nuryartono , Miet Maertens , Axel Marx
Voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) are market-based mechanisms promoting sustainability in agri-food value chains. VSS can create challenges related to compliance, market access and acceptance for producers in emerging countries. To address this challenge, some emerging countries have established national sustainability standards (NSS). This paper compares VSS (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and Rainforest Alliance) and NSS (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil and Lestari Tea Certification) in Indonesia's palm oil and tea sectors on three dimensions: substantive requirements, enforcement procedures, and drivers for adoption. The analysis shows that substantively, while VSS have stricter requirements than NSS, the latter increasingly converge toward VSS. Procedurally, both systems mainly rely on audits for compliance. In term of adoption, VSS are mainly adopted to access export markets, while NSS adoption is driven primarily by regulatory compliance. The implications of the findings are discussed with a specific focus on the potential complementarity between VSS and NSS.
{"title":"National and voluntary sustainability standards: Convergence or divergence? Insights from Indonesian agri-food export sectors","authors":"Muhamad Amin Rifai , Charline Depoorter , Nunung Nuryartono , Miet Maertens , Axel Marx","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100311","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100311","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) are market-based mechanisms promoting sustainability in agri-food value chains. VSS can create challenges related to compliance, market access and acceptance for producers in emerging countries. To address this challenge, some emerging countries have established national sustainability standards (NSS). This paper compares VSS (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and Rainforest Alliance) and NSS (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil and Lestari Tea Certification) in Indonesia's palm oil and tea sectors on three dimensions: substantive requirements, enforcement procedures, and drivers for adoption. The analysis shows that substantively, while VSS have stricter requirements than NSS, the latter increasingly converge toward VSS. Procedurally, both systems mainly rely on audits for compliance. In term of adoption, VSS are mainly adopted to access export markets, while NSS adoption is driven primarily by regulatory compliance. The implications of the findings are discussed with a specific focus on the potential complementarity between VSS and NSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100305
Chloé Taillandier , Lisanne Groen , Joop de Kraker , Raoul Beunen , Ansje J. Löhr
Multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), a key element of global environmental governance, and their associated agreement-making processes have been widely studied, in particular the formal negotiations between national delegates. In contrast, informal interactions—particularly side events— have received much less attention, despite their growing number and increased attendance by a variety of non-state actors. To better understand the nature and functions of these side events, we conducted a systematic literature review, analysing a final selection of 31 articles coded inductively using Atlas.ti 24. Side events differ from other informal interactions by being organised, and the literature points to 26 functions they fulfil. These functions can be associated with their setting, processes, outcomes, and impacts, and may build upon each other at multilateral environmental negotiations and beyond. As most reviewed publications dealt with UNFCCC COPs, further empirical research to broaden our understanding should best focus on side events at other MEAs.
{"title":"Beyond the formal spotlight−Unravelling side events in multilateral environmental negotiations: a review","authors":"Chloé Taillandier , Lisanne Groen , Joop de Kraker , Raoul Beunen , Ansje J. Löhr","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100305","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100305","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), a key element of global environmental governance, and their associated agreement-making processes have been widely studied, in particular the formal negotiations between national delegates. In contrast, informal interactions—particularly side events— have received much less attention, despite their growing number and increased attendance by a variety of non-state actors. To better understand the nature and functions of these side events, we conducted a systematic literature review, analysing a final selection of 31 articles coded inductively using Atlas.ti 24. Side events differ from other informal interactions by being organised, and the literature points to 26 functions they fulfil. These functions can be associated with their setting, processes, outcomes, and impacts, and may build upon each other at multilateral environmental negotiations and beyond. As most reviewed publications dealt with UNFCCC COPs, further empirical research to broaden our understanding should best focus on side events at other MEAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite numerous initiatives, methodologies and approaches, municipalities and regions continue to face challenges in sustaining long-term efforts toward sustainability. While continuously learning from mistakes and success factors, comprehensive recommendations for how to take a long-term approach for the work, specifically developed for leadership in local and regional contexts, are largely lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify a comprehensive set of essential factors that could support long-term sustainability efforts. The study is mainly related to the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development, but the findings are likely relevant also in relation to other comprehensive sustainability methodologies and approaches. Re-analysis of longitudinal data from action research in Sweden and Finland is supplemented by new qualitative data collection, the study identifies eight conditions for continuity. Being introduced to these conditions upfront may save valuable time and could be utilized as a checklist to be revisited regularly and to strive toward.
{"title":"How to enhance continuity of strategic sustainable development work in municipalities and regions – findings from Sweden and Finland","authors":"Lisa Wälitalo , Edith Callaghan , Karl-Henrik Robèrt , Göran Broman","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100307","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100307","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite numerous initiatives, methodologies and approaches, municipalities and regions continue to face challenges in sustaining long-term efforts toward sustainability. While continuously learning from mistakes and success factors, comprehensive recommendations for how to take a long-term approach for the work, specifically developed for leadership in local and regional contexts, are largely lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify a comprehensive set of essential factors that could support long-term sustainability efforts. The study is mainly related to the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development, but the findings are likely relevant also in relation to other comprehensive sustainability methodologies and approaches. Re-analysis of longitudinal data from action research in Sweden and Finland is supplemented by new qualitative data collection, the study identifies eight conditions for continuity. Being introduced to these conditions upfront may save valuable time and could be utilized as a checklist to be revisited regularly and to strive toward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100306
Matilda Petersson, Lisa Dellmuth
The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on international organizations is a perennial question in global governance research. We examine whether and why horizontal venue-shopping strengthens NGO influence on international organizations in the area of biodiversity protection. We argue that horizontal venue-shopping facilitates NGO influence, building on previous studies on institutional complexity and NGO influence in global governance. The argument is examined through process tracing based on extensive fieldwork material in the context of the governance of sharks in the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas during 1994–2021. We find NGO preference attainment in a majority of the studied policy processes, and indicative evidence of increased NGO influence over time. The results suggest that horizontal venue-shopping strengthened the influence of NGOs in several of the examined processes. These findings have broader implications for research on NGO influence in an increasingly complex global governance landscape.
{"title":"Horizontal venue-shopping and non-governmental organizations’ influence on regional fisheries management organizations","authors":"Matilda Petersson, Lisa Dellmuth","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100306","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100306","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on international organizations is a perennial question in global governance research. We examine whether and why horizontal venue-shopping strengthens NGO influence on international organizations in the area of biodiversity protection. We argue that horizontal venue-shopping facilitates NGO influence, building on previous studies on institutional complexity and NGO influence in global governance. The argument is examined through process tracing based on extensive fieldwork material in the context of the governance of sharks in the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas during 1994–2021. We find NGO preference attainment in a majority of the studied policy processes, and indicative evidence of increased NGO influence over time. The results suggest that horizontal venue-shopping strengthened the influence of NGOs in several of the examined processes. These findings have broader implications for research on NGO influence in an increasingly complex global governance landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100304
Nicolas Laurence
Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) have regained prominence as international institutions search for ways to respond to recurring financial crises, rising inequalities, and accelerating climate change. As the only international reserve asset not tied to a national currency, SDRs have been debated as potential instruments for redistributive and ecological purposes, particularly since the unprecedented 650 billion USD allocation of 2021. Yet the terms of these debates reveal the persistent dominance of macro-financial logics over alternative framings. This article develops an analysis of how institutional discourses on SDR reform reflect and reproduce the tension between international monetary hierarchy and ecological vulnerability. It shows that ecological concerns are not absent from official debates but systematically translated into the language of liquidity, debt sustainability, and creditworthiness. Such translation renders ecological values legible while erasing their normative specificity, thereby constraining their transformative potential. By linking international political economy with social ecological economics, the article foregrounds the processes of inclusion, translation, and marginalisation through which plural values are managed in global monetary governance. SDRs thus serve less as instruments of ecological transition than as a diagnostic site for understanding the limits of integrating ecological criteria into a system still structured by financial stability and monetary hierarchy.
{"title":"Special drawing rights and ecological vulnerability: Monetary hierarchy and the translation of values","authors":"Nicolas Laurence","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100304","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100304","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) have regained prominence as international institutions search for ways to respond to recurring financial crises, rising inequalities, and accelerating climate change. As the only international reserve asset not tied to a national currency, SDRs have been debated as potential instruments for redistributive and ecological purposes, particularly since the unprecedented 650 billion USD allocation of 2021. Yet the terms of these debates reveal the persistent dominance of macro-financial logics over alternative framings. This article develops an analysis of how institutional discourses on SDR reform reflect and reproduce the tension between international monetary hierarchy and ecological vulnerability. It shows that ecological concerns are not absent from official debates but systematically translated into the language of liquidity, debt sustainability, and creditworthiness. Such translation renders ecological values legible while erasing their normative specificity, thereby constraining their transformative potential. By linking international political economy with social ecological economics, the article foregrounds the processes of inclusion, translation, and marginalisation through which plural values are managed in global monetary governance. SDRs thus serve less as instruments of ecological transition than as a diagnostic site for understanding the limits of integrating ecological criteria into a system still structured by financial stability and monetary hierarchy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100302
Anouk Fransen , Harriet Bulkeley , Jeffrey E Blackwatters
The notion of transformative change has attracted increasing attention from research and policy communities as societies struggle with the nature and adequacy of responses to the intertwined crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and social justice. Yet while many agree that transformative change is needed, it remains an essentially contested concept. We review how the notion of transformative change has come to be understood in global environmental governance, finding that the focus has been on speed and scope of change with less explicit attention being paid to what is actually being transformed, how and for whom. As a result, certain kinds of change – those which are fast and systemic in scope – are privileged. We argue that this is to miss the very potential of transformative change and offer an approach that holds space for a plural understanding of transformation that allows for different matters of justice to be considered.
{"title":"Conceptualizing transformative change for global environmental governance","authors":"Anouk Fransen , Harriet Bulkeley , Jeffrey E Blackwatters","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The notion of transformative change has attracted increasing attention from research and policy communities as societies struggle with the nature and adequacy of responses to the intertwined crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and social justice. Yet while many agree that transformative change is needed, it remains an essentially contested concept. We review how the notion of transformative change has come to be understood in global environmental governance, finding that the focus has been on speed and scope of change with less explicit attention being paid to what is actually being transformed, how and for whom. As a result, certain kinds of change – those which are fast and systemic in scope – are privileged. We argue that this is to miss the very potential of transformative change and offer an approach that holds space for a plural understanding of transformation that allows for different matters of justice to be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}