Self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102394
Jessica L. Betancourt , R. Matt Alderson , Delanie K. Roberts , Caitlin C. Bullard
{"title":"Self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review","authors":"Jessica L. Betancourt ,&nbsp;R. Matt Alderson ,&nbsp;Delanie K. Roberts ,&nbsp;Caitlin C. Bullard","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meta-analytic methods were used to examine global and domain-specific (i.e., academic, social, behavioral) self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. Potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity were also examined via meta-regressions within a three-level approach. Findings from 49 aggregated global self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 2500, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 9448), 12 academic self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 386, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 315), 11 social self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 258, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 254), and 8 behavioral self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 231, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 211) suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD experience moderate global (<em>ES</em> = 0.46, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), academic (<em>ES</em> = 0.60, <em>p</em> = .009), and social (<em>ES</em> = 0.67, <em>p</em> = .001) self-esteem impairments compared to children and adolescents without the disorder. The aggregated behavioral self-esteem effect size (<em>ES</em> = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .54), however, was not significant, and the global self-esteem effect size was markedly smaller compared to effect sizes for the academic and social domains. Further, examination of potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity indicated null effects for medication status, diagnostic complexity, informant, age, sex, comorbid psychopathology, and self-esteem dimension. Collectively, findings suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD do not hold a ubiquitous negative self-perception of difficulties across academic, social, and behavioral domains of functioning, and unexamined domains that are distal to ADHD may serve to bolster global self-esteem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meta-analytic methods were used to examine global and domain-specific (i.e., academic, social, behavioral) self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. Potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity were also examined via meta-regressions within a three-level approach. Findings from 49 aggregated global self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 2500, TDN = 9448), 12 academic self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 386, TDN = 315), 11 social self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 258, TDN = 254), and 8 behavioral self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 231, TDN = 211) suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD experience moderate global (ES = 0.46, p < .001), academic (ES = 0.60, p = .009), and social (ES = 0.67, p = .001) self-esteem impairments compared to children and adolescents without the disorder. The aggregated behavioral self-esteem effect size (ES = 0.20, p = .54), however, was not significant, and the global self-esteem effect size was markedly smaller compared to effect sizes for the academic and social domains. Further, examination of potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity indicated null effects for medication status, diagnostic complexity, informant, age, sex, comorbid psychopathology, and self-esteem dimension. Collectively, findings suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD do not hold a ubiquitous negative self-perception of difficulties across academic, social, and behavioral domains of functioning, and unexamined domains that are distal to ADHD may serve to bolster global self-esteem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有和未患有注意力缺陷/多动症的儿童和青少年的自尊:荟萃分析综述
我们采用元分析方法研究了患有和不患有多动症的儿童和青少年的整体自尊和特定领域(即学业、社交和行为)自尊。此外,还通过三级元回归法研究了效应大小异质性的潜在调节因素。49 个总体自尊效应大小(ADHDN = 2500,TDN = 9448)、12 个学业自尊效应大小(ADHDN = 386,TDN = 315)、11 个社交自尊效应大小(ADHDN = 258,TDN = 254)和 8 个行为自尊效应大小(ADHDN = 231,TDN = 211)的汇总结果表明,患有多动症的儿童和青少年具有中等程度的总体自尊(ES = 0.46, p < .001)、学业(ES = 0.60, p = .009)和社交(ES = 0.67, p = .001)方面的自尊受损。然而,综合行为自尊效应大小(ES = 0.20,p = .54)并不显著,与学业和社交领域的效应大小相比,总体自尊效应大小明显较小。此外,对效应大小异质性潜在调节因素的研究表明,药物治疗状态、诊断复杂性、信息提供者、年龄、性别、合并精神病理学和自尊维度的效应为零。总之,研究结果表明,患有多动症的儿童和青少年在学习、社交和行为等功能领域并不普遍存在对困难的消极自我认知,而与多动症关系密切的未考察领域可能有助于增强整体自尊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates Gender nonconformity and common mental health problems: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1