首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at Higgins et al. (2024) and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102506
Brett A. Murphy , Judith A. Hall
Critical reviews of a test's measurement validity are valuable scientific contributions, yet even strong reviews can be undermined by subtle problems in how evidence is compiled and presented to readers. First, if discussions of poor reporting practices by a test's users are interwoven with discussions about validity support for the test itself, readers can be inadvertently misled into impressions of the latter which are improperly conflated with the former. Second, test reviewers should give at least as much careful attention to a test's external validity as to its structural validity; test reviewers who prioritize factor analysis and internal consistency at the expense of discriminant and convergent validity can inadvertently mislead readers into perceptions of a test which are more negative or more positive than is warranted by the evidence overall. In this commentary, we aim to help test evaluators in crafting critical investigations of measurement validity. We use Higgins et al.'s (2024) review of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET; Baron-Cohen et al., 2001) as a basis for discussion. We argue that their otherwise impressive review went astray in the two ways described above. After considering both the psychometric evidence that Higgins et al. (2024) provided and the external validity evidence that they did not provide, we conclude that their recommendations that the RMET should be abandoned, and that most prior research findings based on it should be reassessed or disregarded, are unwarranted.
{"title":"How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at Higgins et al. (2024) and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews","authors":"Brett A. Murphy ,&nbsp;Judith A. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Critical reviews of a test's measurement validity are valuable scientific contributions, yet even strong reviews can be undermined by subtle problems in how evidence is compiled and presented to readers. First, if discussions of poor reporting practices by a test's users are interwoven with discussions about validity support for the test itself, readers can be inadvertently misled into impressions of the latter which are improperly conflated with the former. Second, test reviewers should give at least as much careful attention to a test's external validity as to its structural validity; test reviewers who prioritize factor analysis and internal consistency at the expense of discriminant and convergent validity can inadvertently mislead readers into perceptions of a test which are more negative or more positive than is warranted by the evidence overall. In this commentary, we aim to help test evaluators in crafting critical investigations of measurement validity. We use <span><span>Higgins et al.'s (2024)</span></span> review of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET; <span><span>Baron-Cohen et al., 2001</span></span>) as a basis for discussion. We argue that their otherwise impressive review went astray in the two ways described above. After considering both the psychometric evidence that <span><span>Higgins et al. (2024)</span></span> provided and the external validity evidence that they did not provide, we conclude that their recommendations that the RMET should be abandoned, and that most prior research findings based on it should be reassessed or disregarded, are unwarranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102506"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142745083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are digital psychological interventions for psychological distress and quality of life in cancer patients effective? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102520
Tao Zhang , Zhihong Ren , Claire Elizabeth Wakefield , Bryant Pui Hung Hui , Tatsuo Akechi , Congrong Shi , Xiayu Du , Wenke Chen , Lizu Lai , Chunxiao Zhao , Ying Li , Yubu Zhou

Background

Many cancer patients experience psychological distress and/or poor quality of life during or after their cancer treatment, yet they face multiple barriers to accessing psychological support. Digital psychological interventions represent a promising approach for addressing these barriers, however their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain.

Methods

Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2024. The primary outcomes were psychological distress and quality of life, and the secondary outcomes were measures of depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, and fear of cancer recurrence in this study.

Results

One hundred and thirty-six RCTs with 23,154 participants were identified. Of these interventions, three types—digitally-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), health education, and virtual reality therapy (VRT)—demonstrated significant reductions in psychological distress compared to non-active controls. Digital CBT, narrative interventions, and VRT significantly improved quality of life compared to non-active controls. For depression, both digital CBT and VRT were superior to the non-active control group. Regarding anxiety, CBT, psychoeducation, and VRT outperformed the non-active control group. In terms of fatigue, CBT, psychoeducation, VRT, and multi-component interventions all showed enhanced efficacy compared to the non-active control group. However, only CBT exhibited significantly superior effectiveness in alleviating insomnia compared to non-active controls. Similarly, only mindfulness-based interventions significantly reduced fear of cancer recurrence compared to the non-active control condition.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that digital CBT and VRT are highly promising options for reducing psychological distress and enhancing the quality of life among cancer patients; further high-quality randomized controlled trials involving diverse populations are essential to validate these findings.
{"title":"Are digital psychological interventions for psychological distress and quality of life in cancer patients effective? A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Tao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihong Ren ,&nbsp;Claire Elizabeth Wakefield ,&nbsp;Bryant Pui Hung Hui ,&nbsp;Tatsuo Akechi ,&nbsp;Congrong Shi ,&nbsp;Xiayu Du ,&nbsp;Wenke Chen ,&nbsp;Lizu Lai ,&nbsp;Chunxiao Zhao ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Yubu Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102520","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102520","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many cancer patients experience psychological distress and/or poor quality of life during or after their cancer treatment, yet they face multiple barriers to accessing psychological support. Digital psychological interventions represent a promising approach for addressing these barriers, however their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2024. The primary outcomes were psychological distress and quality of life, and the secondary outcomes were measures of depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, and fear of cancer recurrence in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and thirty-six RCTs with 23,154 participants were identified. Of these interventions, three types—digitally-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), health education, and virtual reality therapy (VRT)—demonstrated significant reductions in psychological distress compared to non-active controls. Digital CBT, narrative interventions, and VRT significantly improved quality of life compared to non-active controls. For depression, both digital CBT and VRT were superior to the non-active control group. Regarding anxiety, CBT, psychoeducation, and VRT outperformed the non-active control group. In terms of fatigue, CBT, psychoeducation, VRT, and multi-component interventions all showed enhanced efficacy compared to the non-active control group. However, only CBT exhibited significantly superior effectiveness in alleviating insomnia compared to non-active controls. Similarly, only mindfulness-based interventions significantly reduced fear of cancer recurrence compared to the non-active control condition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results suggest that digital CBT and VRT are highly promising options for reducing psychological distress and enhancing the quality of life among cancer patients; further high-quality randomized controlled trials involving diverse populations are essential to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102520"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142757053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102521
R.L. Dean , K.J. Lester , E. Grant , A.P. Field , F. Orchard , V. Pile
Negative self-perceptions are implicated in the development and maintenance of depression in young people, but little is known about their receptiveness to change in response to treatment. This paper reports on a pre-registered meta-analysis examining the extent to which treatments for depression in young people aged 11–24 result in changes to self-perceptions. Controlled treatment trials examining outcomes related to self-perceptions were synthesised (k = 20, N = 2041), finding small reductions in both symptoms of depression (g = −0.30; 95 % CI: −0.52, −0.08) and self-perception outcomes (g = 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.16, 0.49) for interventions compared with control groups. Meta-regression analyses found no significant association between reductions in depressive symptoms and improvements in self-perception following treatment, suggesting that despite interventions generally improving both outcomes these changes may be unrelated to each other. Our results indicate that young people's self-perceptions are sensitive to change following treatment for depression, however effect sizes are small and treatments could be more effective in targeting and changing negative self-perceptions. Given the importance that young people place on integrating work on their sense of self into treatments for depression, future interventions could aim to support young people with depression to develop a positive sense of self.
{"title":"The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis","authors":"R.L. Dean ,&nbsp;K.J. Lester ,&nbsp;E. Grant ,&nbsp;A.P. Field ,&nbsp;F. Orchard ,&nbsp;V. Pile","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102521","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102521","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Negative self-perceptions are implicated in the development and maintenance of depression in young people, but little is known about their receptiveness to change in response to treatment. This paper reports on a pre-registered meta-analysis examining the extent to which treatments for depression in young people aged 11–24 result in changes to self-perceptions. Controlled treatment trials examining outcomes related to self-perceptions were synthesised (<em>k</em> = 20, <em>N</em> = 2041), finding small reductions in both symptoms of depression (<em>g</em> = −0.30; 95 % CI: −0.52, −0.08) and self-perception outcomes (<em>g</em> = 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.16, 0.49) for interventions compared with control groups. Meta-regression analyses found no significant association between reductions in depressive symptoms and improvements in self-perception following treatment, suggesting that despite interventions generally improving both outcomes these changes may be unrelated to each other. Our results indicate that young people's self-perceptions are sensitive to change following treatment for depression, however effect sizes are small and treatments could be more effective in targeting and changing negative self-perceptions. Given the importance that young people place on integrating work on their sense of self into treatments for depression, future interventions could aim to support young people with depression to develop a positive sense of self.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102521"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142757052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia’ [Clinical Psychology Review 114 (2024) 102507]. 对 "认知行为疗法各组成部分对失眠症疗效的网络荟萃分析 "的更正[《临床心理学评论》114 (2024) 102507]。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102519
Lisa Steinmetz , Laura Simon , Bernd Feige , Dieter Riemann , Anna F. Johann , Johanna Ell , David D. Ebert , Harald Baumeister , Fee Benz , Kai Spiegelhalder
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia’ [Clinical Psychology Review 114 (2024) 102507].","authors":"Lisa Steinmetz ,&nbsp;Laura Simon ,&nbsp;Bernd Feige ,&nbsp;Dieter Riemann ,&nbsp;Anna F. Johann ,&nbsp;Johanna Ell ,&nbsp;David D. Ebert ,&nbsp;Harald Baumeister ,&nbsp;Fee Benz ,&nbsp;Kai Spiegelhalder","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102519","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102519"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do the effects of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) last after a year and beyond? A meta-analysis of 154 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 网络认知行为疗法(i-CBT)的疗效在一年后还会持续吗?对154项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102518
Nur Hani Zainal , Chui Pin Soh , Natalia Van Doren , Corina Benjet
Although the short-term efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) is well-established, its long-term efficacy remains understudied. Robust variance estimation meta-analysis was thus conducted across guided and self-guided i-CBT, synthesizing data from 154 randomized controlled trials (N = 45,335) with ≥ 12-month follow-ups. For binary outcomes, guided (52.3% vs. 38.6%; log-risk ratio [LOG-RR] = 1.15 95% confidence interval [1.04, 1.26]) yielded higher remission, reliable improvement, and response rates, and lower suboptimal treatment outcome rates (9.3% vs. 10.8%; LOG-RR = 0.63 [0.45, 0.80]) than treatment-as-usual, active controls, and waitlists at ≥12 months. Insufficient studies precluded testing the efficacy between self-guided i-CBT and controls for binary outcomes. For baseline-to-12-month dimensional outcomes, guided i-CBT produced greater reductions in anxiety, depressive, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and repetitive negative thinking (Hedge's g = −1.86 to −0.31), and self-guided i-CBT yielded stronger reductions in depressive symptoms (g = −0.51) than all controls. For outcome scores aggregated at ≥ 12-month follow-ups, guided i-CBT alleviated anxiety, depression, distress, insomnia, PTSD symptoms, role impairment, emotion regulation, and quality of life (g = −0.31 to 0.26), and self-guided i-CBT yielded lower anxiety and depressive symptoms (g = −0.16 to −0.09) than all controls. No significant differences in efficacy emerged between guided and self-guided i-CBT when sufficient studies existed for a meta-analysis. There was no evidence for publication bias. Long-term efficacy was similar to short-term efficacy for most outcomes. Implementing scalable i-CBTs should entail transparency about their long-term benefits and drawbacks.
尽管网络认知行为疗法(i-CBT)的短期疗效已得到证实,但其长期疗效仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们对指导型和自我指导型 i-CBT 进行了稳健的方差估计荟萃分析,综合了 154 项随机对照试验(N = 45335)中随访时间≥ 12 个月的数据。就二元结果而言,在≥12个月时,指导治疗(52.3% vs. 38.6%;对数风险比 [LOG-RR] = 1.15 95% 置信区间 [1.04, 1.26])的缓解率、可靠改善率和反应率均高于常规治疗、积极对照组和候补治疗,而次优治疗结果率(9.3% vs. 10.8%;LOG-RR = 0.63 [0.45, 0.80])则低于常规治疗、积极对照组和候补治疗。由于研究不足,无法测试自我指导的 i-CBT 和对照组在二元结果方面的疗效。对于从基线到 12 个月的维度结果,与所有对照组相比,引导式 i-CBT 对焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状和重复性负性思维(Hedge's g = -1.86 到 -0.31)有更大的缓解作用,而自我引导式 i-CBT 对抑郁症状(g = -0.51)有更强的缓解作用。在≥12个月的随访中,指导型i-CBT减轻了焦虑、抑郁、痛苦、失眠、创伤后应激障碍症状、角色障碍、情绪调节和生活质量(g = -0.31至0.26),而自我指导型i-CBT的焦虑和抑郁症状(g = -0.16至-0.09)低于所有对照组。如果有足够的研究可供进行荟萃分析,则指导型 i-CBT 和自我指导型 i-CBT 在疗效上没有明显差异。没有证据表明存在出版偏差。大多数结果的长期疗效与短期疗效相似。在实施可扩展的 i-CBT 时,应将其长期效益和缺点透明化。
{"title":"Do the effects of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) last after a year and beyond? A meta-analysis of 154 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)","authors":"Nur Hani Zainal ,&nbsp;Chui Pin Soh ,&nbsp;Natalia Van Doren ,&nbsp;Corina Benjet","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102518","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102518","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the short-term efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) is well-established, its long-term efficacy remains understudied. Robust variance estimation meta-analysis was thus conducted across guided and self-guided i-CBT, synthesizing data from 154 randomized controlled trials (<em>N</em> = 45,335) with ≥ 12-month follow-ups. For binary outcomes, guided (52.3% vs. 38.6%; log-risk ratio [LOG-RR] = 1.15 95% confidence interval [1.04, 1.26]) yielded higher remission, reliable improvement, and response rates, and lower suboptimal treatment outcome rates (9.3% vs. 10.8%; LOG-RR = 0.63 [0.45, 0.80]) than treatment-as-usual, active controls, and waitlists at ≥12 months. Insufficient studies precluded testing the efficacy between self-guided i-CBT and controls for binary outcomes. For baseline-to-12-month dimensional outcomes, guided i-CBT produced greater reductions in anxiety, depressive, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and repetitive negative thinking (Hedge's <em>g</em> = −1.86 to −0.31), and self-guided i-CBT yielded stronger reductions in depressive symptoms (<em>g</em> = −0.51) than all controls. For outcome scores aggregated at ≥ 12-month follow-ups, guided i-CBT alleviated anxiety, depression, distress, insomnia, PTSD symptoms, role impairment, emotion regulation, and quality of life (<em>g</em> = −0.31 to 0.26), and self-guided i-CBT yielded lower anxiety and depressive symptoms (<em>g</em> = −0.16 to −0.09) than all controls. No significant differences in efficacy emerged between guided and self-guided i-CBT when sufficient studies existed for a meta-analysis. There was no evidence for publication bias. Long-term efficacy was similar to short-term efficacy for most outcomes. Implementing scalable i-CBTs should entail transparency about their long-term benefits and drawbacks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102518"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of expectations and attention on conditioned pain modulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis 预期和注意力对条件性疼痛调节的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102517
Amber Billens , Sophie Van Oosterwijck , Evy Dhondt , Mira Meeus , Indra De Greef , Stefaan Van Damme , Jessica Van Oosterwijck
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysical experimental measure of endogenous pain inhibition in humans. Within this paradigm, one noxious stimulus, the conditioning stimulus (CS), reduces the pain perception from another heterotopic noxious stimulus, the test stimulus (TS). Cognitive processes are known to influence pain perception and might impact the underlying mechanisms of CPM. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing scientific literature addressing the influence of cognitive factors, namely, expectations and attention on CPM. Four electronic databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed according to two modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales and the GRADE approach, respectively. Twenty-four articles were included. Qualitative analysis showed more efficient CPM when pain relief is expected, and an association between intrinsic attention to pain and reduced CPM. Although the evidence is not unanimous, meta-analyses showed that CPM is more efficient when attention is directed towards the CS versus the TS, and is not influenced by distraction. In conclusion, while CPM seems robust to attentional distraction, expectations and attentional focus appear to influence CPM. However, the evidence is limited and conflicting and warrants further study in order to prevent cognitive confounding and enhance mechanistic understanding.
条件性疼痛调节(CPM)是对人类内源性疼痛抑制的一种心理物理实验测量方法。在这一范例中,一种有害刺激--条件刺激(CS)--会降低来自另一种异位有害刺激--测试刺激(TS)的痛觉。众所周知,认知过程会影响痛觉,并可能影响 CPM 的基本机制。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了现有的科学文献,探讨了认知因素(即期望和注意力)对 CPM 的影响。我们检索了四个电子数据库以确定相关文献。分别根据两个修订的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 GRADE 方法评估了偏倚风险和证据质量。共纳入 24 篇文章。定性分析显示,当疼痛有望缓解时,CPM 的效率更高,而对疼痛的内在关注与减少 CPM 之间存在关联。尽管证据并不一致,但荟萃分析表明,当注意力指向 CS 而不是 TS 时,CPM 的效率更高,且不受注意力分散的影响。总之,虽然 CPM 似乎不受注意力分散的影响,但期望和注意力集中似乎会影响 CPM。然而,这些证据是有限和相互矛盾的,因此需要进一步研究,以防止认知混淆并加深对机理的理解。
{"title":"The influence of expectations and attention on conditioned pain modulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Amber Billens ,&nbsp;Sophie Van Oosterwijck ,&nbsp;Evy Dhondt ,&nbsp;Mira Meeus ,&nbsp;Indra De Greef ,&nbsp;Stefaan Van Damme ,&nbsp;Jessica Van Oosterwijck","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102517","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102517","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysical experimental measure of endogenous pain inhibition in humans. Within this paradigm, one noxious stimulus, the conditioning stimulus (CS), reduces the pain perception from another heterotopic noxious stimulus, the test stimulus (TS). Cognitive processes are known to influence pain perception and might impact the underlying mechanisms of CPM. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing scientific literature addressing the influence of cognitive factors, namely, expectations and attention on CPM. Four electronic databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed according to two modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales and the GRADE approach, respectively. Twenty-four articles were included. Qualitative analysis showed more efficient CPM when pain relief is expected, and an association between intrinsic attention to pain and reduced CPM. Although the evidence is not unanimous, meta-analyses showed that CPM is more efficient when attention is directed towards the CS versus the TS, and is not influenced by distraction. In conclusion, while CPM seems robust to attentional distraction, expectations and attentional focus appear to influence CPM. However, the evidence is limited and conflicting and warrants further study in order to prevent cognitive confounding and enhance mechanistic understanding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102517"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of app-based mobile health interventions for stress management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-reported, physiological, and neuroendocrine stress-related outcomes 基于应用程序的移动健康干预对压力管理的功效:对自我报告、生理和神经内分泌压力相关结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102515
Vasile Sîrbu , Oana Alexandra David
Stress is a significant mental health concern for the general population, highlighting the need for effective and scalable solutions, such as mobile health (mHealth) app interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of mHealth apps designed primarily to reduce stress and distress in non-clinical and subclinical populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024, including studies that measured both self-reported and physiological stress outcomes. 80 studies were analyzed. A small but significant effect size (g = 0.33) was found for self-reported stress outcomes, with studies that used specific active controls, operated in naturalistic contexts, and had a low risk of bias showing significantly lower effect sizes. A similarly small effect size was observed for physiological outcomes (g = 0.24). Notably, studies that employed muscle and breathing relaxation, meditation strategies, personalized guidance, experimental usage settings, and measured acute stress responses demonstrated significantly higher effect sizes. Further analysis of specific physiological systems revealed small effect sizes for autonomic (g = 0.32) and cardiac outcomes (g = 0.36). The significant effects observed across both psychological and physiological outcomes support the efficacy and potential of mHealth apps for the self-management of stress responses in the broader population.
压力是普通人群关注的一个重要心理健康问题,因此需要有效且可扩展的解决方案,如移动医疗(mHealth)应用干预。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究移动医疗应用程序的效果,这些应用程序主要用于减轻非临床和亚临床人群的压力和痛苦。我们对截至 2024 年 8 月的文献进行了全面检索,包括测量自我报告和生理压力结果的研究。共分析了 80 项研究。研究发现,自我报告的压力结果的效应大小(g = 0.33)较小,但具有显著性,使用特定主动对照、在自然环境中进行操作、偏倚风险较低的研究显示的效应大小明显较低。生理结果的效应大小同样较小(g = 0.24)。值得注意的是,采用肌肉和呼吸放松、冥想策略、个性化指导、实验性使用设置以及测量急性应激反应的研究显示出明显较高的效应量。对特定生理系统的进一步分析表明,自律神经系统(g = 0.32)和心脏系统(g = 0.36)的效果较小。在心理和生理结果中观察到的显着效应支持了移动医疗应用程序在更广泛人群中对压力反应进行自我管理的功效和潜力。
{"title":"Efficacy of app-based mobile health interventions for stress management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-reported, physiological, and neuroendocrine stress-related outcomes","authors":"Vasile Sîrbu ,&nbsp;Oana Alexandra David","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102515","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stress is a significant mental health concern for the general population, highlighting the need for effective and scalable solutions, such as mobile health (mHealth) app interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of mHealth apps designed primarily to reduce stress and distress in non-clinical and subclinical populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024, including studies that measured both self-reported and physiological stress outcomes. 80 studies were analyzed. A small but significant effect size (<em>g</em> = 0.33) was found for self-reported stress outcomes, with studies that used specific active controls, operated in naturalistic contexts, and had a low risk of bias showing significantly lower effect sizes. A similarly small effect size was observed for physiological outcomes (<em>g</em> = 0.24). Notably, studies that employed muscle and breathing relaxation, meditation strategies, personalized guidance, experimental usage settings, and measured acute stress responses demonstrated significantly higher effect sizes. Further analysis of specific physiological systems revealed small effect sizes for autonomic (<em>g</em> = 0.32) and cardiac outcomes (<em>g</em> = 0.36). The significant effects observed across both psychological and physiological outcomes support the efficacy and potential of mHealth apps for the self-management of stress responses in the broader population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102515"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inter-identity amnesia and memory transfer in dissociative identity disorder: A systematic review with a meta-analysis 分离性身份识别障碍中的身份间遗忘和记忆转移:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102514
Julia C. Beker , Martin J. Dorahy , Jaimee Moir , Jacinta Cording
Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) often report an inability to retrieve memories associated with other identities, termed inter-identity amnesia (IIA). Research investigating IIA has amassed, and interest surrounds whether objective deficits in retrieval mechanisms necessarily underlie the experience of IIA. This study conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analyses to examine current findings on IIA in DID. In particular, we explored whether DID patients' clinical reports of retrieval failure across identities were substantiated by controlled measures of memory. Nineteen empirical and four case studies informed the systematic review. The meta-analyses comprised twelve of the included studies. The systematic review findings suggested a degree of inter-identity memory transfer, a conclusion which was supported by two of the four meta-analyses. The remaining two meta-analyses evidenced patterns closer to IIA. Closer examination drew attention to methodological considerations that may limit definitive conclusions drawn from present studies. These include substantial heterogeneity between participants' scores which is masked by group statistics, a small and homogenous cumulative sample, limited research teams, and minimal domains of memory assessed. The paper urges a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon of IIA in light of current findings.
分离性身份识别障碍(DID)患者经常报告无法检索与其他身份相关的记忆,这被称为身份间遗忘症(IIA)。有关 IIA 的研究已经很多,人们对检索机制的客观缺陷是否一定是 IIA 体验的基础产生了兴趣。本研究通过系统性文献综述和荟萃分析,对目前有关 DID IIA 的研究结果进行了研究。特别是,我们探讨了 DID 患者关于跨身份检索失败的临床报告是否得到了对照记忆测量的证实。19项实证研究和4项病例研究为系统综述提供了信息。荟萃分析包括所纳入研究中的 12 项。系统综述的结果表明,身份间记忆有一定程度的转移,这一结论得到了四项荟萃分析中两项的支持。其余两项荟萃分析的模式更接近于 IIA。仔细研究会发现,方法上的考虑可能会限制从目前的研究中得出明确的结论。这些因素包括被分组统计所掩盖的参与者得分之间的巨大异质性、累积样本量小而单一、研究团队有限以及评估的记忆领域极少。本文呼吁根据目前的研究结果对 IIA 现象进行细致入微的理解。
{"title":"Inter-identity amnesia and memory transfer in dissociative identity disorder: A systematic review with a meta-analysis","authors":"Julia C. Beker ,&nbsp;Martin J. Dorahy ,&nbsp;Jaimee Moir ,&nbsp;Jacinta Cording","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102514","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102514","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) often report an inability to retrieve memories associated with other identities, termed inter-identity amnesia (IIA). Research investigating IIA has amassed, and interest surrounds whether objective deficits in retrieval mechanisms necessarily underlie the experience of IIA. This study conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analyses to examine current findings on IIA in DID. In particular, we explored whether DID patients' clinical reports of retrieval failure across identities were substantiated by controlled measures of memory. Nineteen empirical and four case studies informed the systematic review. The meta-analyses comprised twelve of the included studies. The systematic review findings suggested a degree of inter-identity memory transfer, a conclusion which was supported by two of the four meta-analyses. The remaining two meta-analyses evidenced patterns closer to IIA. Closer examination drew attention to methodological considerations that may limit definitive conclusions drawn from present studies. These include substantial heterogeneity between participants' scores which is masked by group statistics, a small and homogenous cumulative sample, limited research teams, and minimal domains of memory assessed. The paper urges a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon of IIA in light of current findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102514"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between sensory processing differences and internalising/externalising problems in autism 自闭症患者感觉处理差异与内化/外化问题之间关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102516
Yixin Chen , Zhenyang Xi , Rob Saunders , David Simmons , Vasiliki Totsika , Will Mandy
There is evidence to suggest that sensory processing differences (SPDs) to external stimuli are a plausible underlying mechanism for mental health problems among autistic people. In the current systematic review, we examined the associations between, on the one hand, eleven types of SPDs and, on the other hand, internalising and externalising problems. The literature search was conducted on five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL) between 1990 and August 2024. Studies with autistic people aged under 65 years-old that reported correlations between SPDs and internalising/externalising problems were included. Three-level and random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were conducted. In total, we included 63 articles (11,659 participants) in the current review. Overall, higher levels of all SPD subtypes were found to be associated with greater internalising/externalising problems. Hypersensitivity, visual, auditory, and tactile sensitivities were strongly associated with internalising/externalising problems, while smaller effects were observed for unusual processing of smell and taste. Sensation seeking was highly linked with externalising problems, whereas it was the least associated sensory subtype with internalising problems. Future studies could address the limitations in the extant literature (e.g., heterogeneity in the estimates of associations, a lack of externalising problem investigations and longitudinal studies) to further advance our understanding of the role of SPDs in the aetiology, development, and treatment of internalising/externalising problems in autism.
有证据表明,对外界刺激的感觉处理差异(SPDs)是自闭症患者出现心理健康问题的一个可信的潜在机制。在本系统综述中,我们研究了 11 种 SPD 与内化和外化问题之间的关联。文献检索在 1990 年至 2024 年 8 月期间的五个数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 CINAHL)中进行。研究对象为 65 岁以下的自闭症患者,研究内容包括 SPD 与内化/外化问题之间的相关性。我们进行了三级随机效应荟萃分析和叙述性综合分析。本次综述共纳入 63 篇文章(11659 名参与者)。总体而言,所有 SPD 亚型的较高水平都与较严重的内化/外化问题有关。过度敏感、视觉、听觉和触觉敏感与内化/外化问题密切相关,而嗅觉和味觉异常处理的影响较小。寻求感觉与外部化问题的关联度很高,而它是与内部化问题关联度最低的感官亚型。未来的研究可以解决现有文献的局限性(例如,关联估计的异质性、缺乏外部化问题调查和纵向研究),从而进一步加深我们对自闭症患者内化/外部化问题的病因、发展和治疗中SPDs作用的理解。
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between sensory processing differences and internalising/externalising problems in autism","authors":"Yixin Chen ,&nbsp;Zhenyang Xi ,&nbsp;Rob Saunders ,&nbsp;David Simmons ,&nbsp;Vasiliki Totsika ,&nbsp;Will Mandy","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102516","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102516","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is evidence to suggest that sensory processing differences (SPDs) to external stimuli are a plausible underlying mechanism for mental health problems among autistic people. In the current systematic review, we examined the associations between, on the one hand, eleven types of SPDs and, on the other hand, internalising and externalising problems. The literature search was conducted on five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL) between 1990 and August 2024. Studies with autistic people aged under 65 years-old that reported correlations between SPDs and internalising/externalising problems were included. Three-level and random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were conducted. In total, we included 63 articles (11,659 participants) in the current review. Overall, higher levels of all SPD subtypes were found to be associated with greater internalising/externalising problems. Hypersensitivity, visual, auditory, and tactile sensitivities were strongly associated with internalising/externalising problems, while smaller effects were observed for unusual processing of smell and taste. Sensation seeking was highly linked with externalising problems, whereas it was the least associated sensory subtype with internalising problems. Future studies could address the limitations in the extant literature (e.g., heterogeneity in the estimates of associations, a lack of externalising problem investigations and longitudinal studies) to further advance our understanding of the role of SPDs in the aetiology, development, and treatment of internalising/externalising problems in autism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102516"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142604331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Altered representation of peripersonal and interpersonal space in psychopathology 精神病理学中的个人和人际空间表征改变
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102509
Hyeon-Seung Lee , Daphne J. Holt , Sohee Park
The space surrounding the body, and the regulation of this buffer zone play a central role in adaptive behavior, with direct implications for psychopathology. The physical distance that we choose to maintain between ourselves and others for social comfort is known as Interpersonal Distance (IPD), whereas the action space that marks the perceptual border between the self and the external world is known as Peripersonal Space (PPS
). While both IPD and PPS represent personal space, they are distinct constructs, each associated with different methodologies. Here we review the existing literature on IPD and PPS to elucidate their distinct and common contributions to psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia, autism, anxiety, and others. Altered representation and regulation of IPD and PPS were associated with clinical symptoms and social impairments across a wide range of psychiatric disorders, underscoring the important role of the self-other boundary and personal space regulation in adaptive social behavior. Future research should clarify the relationship between IPD and PPS and specify risk factors for self-other boundary dysregulation and associated psychopathologies.
身体周围的空间以及对这一缓冲区的调节在适应行为中发挥着核心作用,并对精神病理学产生直接影响。为了社交舒适,我们选择在自己与他人之间保持的物理距离被称为人际距离(IPD),而标志着自我与外部世界之间感知边界的行动空间则被称为周身空间(PPS)。虽然 IPD 和 PPS 都代表个人空间,但它们是不同的概念,各自与不同的方法论相关联。在此,我们回顾了有关 IPD 和 PPS 的现有文献,以阐明它们对精神分裂症、自闭症、焦虑症等精神疾病的不同和共同作用。IPD和PPS的表征和调节的改变与多种精神疾病的临床症状和社交障碍有关,强调了自他边界和个人空间调节在适应性社交行为中的重要作用。未来的研究应阐明 IPD 和 PPS 之间的关系,并明确自我-他者边界失调和相关精神病理学的风险因素。
{"title":"Altered representation of peripersonal and interpersonal space in psychopathology","authors":"Hyeon-Seung Lee ,&nbsp;Daphne J. Holt ,&nbsp;Sohee Park","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102509","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102509","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The space surrounding the body, and the regulation of this buffer zone play a central role in adaptive behavior, with direct implications for psychopathology. The physical distance that we choose to maintain between ourselves and others for social comfort is known as Interpersonal Distance (IPD), whereas the action space that marks the perceptual border between the self and the external world is known as Peripersonal Space (PPS</div><div>). While both IPD and PPS represent personal space, they are distinct constructs, each associated with different methodologies. Here we review the existing literature on IPD and PPS to elucidate their distinct and common contributions to psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia, autism, anxiety, and others. Altered representation and regulation of IPD and PPS were associated with clinical symptoms and social impairments across a wide range of psychiatric disorders, underscoring the important role of the self-other boundary and personal space regulation in adaptive social behavior. Future research should clarify the relationship between IPD and PPS and specify risk factors for self-other boundary dysregulation and associated psychopathologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102509"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142704239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1