Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study).

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/XST-230275
Zyad A Tawfik, Mohamed El-Azab Farid, Khaled M El Shahat, Ahmed A Hussein, Mostafa Al Etreby
{"title":"Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study).","authors":"Zyad A Tawfik, Mohamed El-Azab Farid, Khaled M El Shahat, Ahmed A Hussein, Mostafa Al Etreby","doi":"10.3233/XST-230275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SRS and SRT are precise treatments for brain metastases, delivering high doses while minimizing doses to nearby organs. Modern linear accelerators enable the precise delivery of SRS/SRT using different modalities like three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and Rapid Arc (RA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare dosimetric differences and evaluate the effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc techniques in SRS/SRT for brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 patients with brain metastases, 3 patients assigned for SRT, and 7 patients for SRS. For each patient, 3 treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system using different treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed among the three techniques in the homogeneity index (HI), maximum D2%, and minimum D98% doses for the target, with a p > 0.05. The RA demonstrated a better conformity index of 1.14±0.25 than both IMRT 1.21±0.26 and 3DCRT 1.37±0.31. 3DCRT and IMRT had lower Gradient Index values compared to RA, suggesting that they achieved a better dose gradient than RA. The mean treatment time decreased by 26.2% and 10.3% for 3DCRT and RA, respectively, compared to IMRT. In organs at risk, 3DCRT had lower maximum doses than IMRT and RA, but some differences were not statistically significant. However, in the brain stem and brain tissues, RA exhibited lower maximum doses compared to IMRT and 3DCRT. Additionally, RA and IMRT had lower V15Gy, V12Gy, and V9Gy values compared to 3DCRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While 3D-CRT delivered lower doses to organs at risk, RA and IMRT provided better conformity and target coverage. RA effectively controlled the maximum dose and irradiated volume of normal brain tissue. Overall, these findings indicate that 3DCRT, RA, and IMRT are suitable for treating brain metastases in SRS/SRT due to their improved dose conformity and target coverage while minimizing dose to healthy tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"765-781"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-230275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: SRS and SRT are precise treatments for brain metastases, delivering high doses while minimizing doses to nearby organs. Modern linear accelerators enable the precise delivery of SRS/SRT using different modalities like three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and Rapid Arc (RA).

Objective: This study aims to compare dosimetric differences and evaluate the effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc techniques in SRS/SRT for brain metastases.

Methods: 10 patients with brain metastases, 3 patients assigned for SRT, and 7 patients for SRS. For each patient, 3 treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system using different treatment modalities.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed among the three techniques in the homogeneity index (HI), maximum D2%, and minimum D98% doses for the target, with a p > 0.05. The RA demonstrated a better conformity index of 1.14±0.25 than both IMRT 1.21±0.26 and 3DCRT 1.37±0.31. 3DCRT and IMRT had lower Gradient Index values compared to RA, suggesting that they achieved a better dose gradient than RA. The mean treatment time decreased by 26.2% and 10.3% for 3DCRT and RA, respectively, compared to IMRT. In organs at risk, 3DCRT had lower maximum doses than IMRT and RA, but some differences were not statistically significant. However, in the brain stem and brain tissues, RA exhibited lower maximum doses compared to IMRT and 3DCRT. Additionally, RA and IMRT had lower V15Gy, V12Gy, and V9Gy values compared to 3DCRT.

Conclusion: While 3D-CRT delivered lower doses to organs at risk, RA and IMRT provided better conformity and target coverage. RA effectively controlled the maximum dose and irradiated volume of normal brain tissue. Overall, these findings indicate that 3DCRT, RA, and IMRT are suitable for treating brain metastases in SRS/SRT due to their improved dose conformity and target coverage while minimizing dose to healthy tissues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同放射治疗模式对脑转移瘤进行立体定向放射手术(SRS)/立体定向放射治疗(SRT)的方法(可行性研究)。
背景:SRS 和 SRT 是治疗脑转移瘤的精确疗法,可在提供高剂量的同时最大限度地减少对邻近器官的剂量。现代直线加速器可通过三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)、调强放射治疗(IMRT)和快速弧形放射治疗(RA)等不同模式精确实施 SRS/SRT:本研究旨在比较三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)、调强放射治疗(IMRT)和快速弧形放射治疗(RA)在脑转移瘤 SRS/SRT 治疗中的剂量学差异并评估其有效性。方法:10 名脑转移患者中,3 名患者被分配接受 SRT 治疗,7 名患者接受 SRS 治疗,使用 Eclipse 治疗计划系统为每名患者生成 3 个治疗计划,并使用不同的治疗模式:结果:三种技术在目标的均匀性指数(HI)、最大 D2% 和最小 D98% 剂量方面均无统计学差异,P>0.05。RA的符合性指数为1.14±0.25,优于IMRT的1.21±0.26和3DCRT的1.37±0.31。与 RA 相比,3DCRT 和 IMRT 的梯度指数值较低,这表明它们比 RA 获得了更好的剂量梯度。与 IMRT 相比,3DCRT 和 RA 的平均治疗时间分别缩短了 26.2% 和 10.3%。在高危器官中,3DCRT的最大剂量低于IMRT和RA,但有些差异在统计学上并不显著。不过,在脑干和脑组织中,RA 的最大剂量低于 IMRT 和 3DCRT。此外,与 3DCRT 相比,RA 和 IMRT 的 V15Gy、V12Gy 和 V9Gy 值更低:结论:3D-CRT 为危险器官提供的剂量较低,但 RA 和 IMRT 的适形性和目标覆盖范围更好。RA有效控制了正常脑组织的最大剂量和照射体积。总之,这些研究结果表明,3DCRT、RA 和 IMRT 适合在 SRS/SRT 中治疗脑转移瘤,因为它们能改善剂量一致性和目标覆盖范围,同时最大限度地减少对健康组织的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research areas within the scope of the journal include: Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes
期刊最新文献
Industrial digital radiographic image denoising based on improved KBNet. Research on the effectiveness of multi-view slice correction strategy based on deep learning in high pitch helical CT reconstruction. A fully linearized ADMM algorithm for optimization based image reconstruction. A reconstruction method for ptychography based on residual dense network. Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1