A Survey on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prenatal Asphyxia based on Antioxidant Oxidant Balance: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Current Pediatric Reviews Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.2174/0115733963264881231227112345
Boskabadi Hassan, Amirkhani Samin, Tahereh Loghmani, Zakerihamidi Maryam
{"title":"A Survey on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prenatal Asphyxia based on Antioxidant Oxidant Balance: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Boskabadi Hassan, Amirkhani Samin, Tahereh Loghmani, Zakerihamidi Maryam","doi":"10.2174/0115733963264881231227112345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mechanism of occurrence and complications of asphyxia change in the treatment process and the future prognosis of newborns. One of the discussed mechanisms is the disruption of oxidants to anti-oxidants balance. Therefore, the current study was conducted aiming to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the diagnosis and prognosis of prenatal asphyxia based on oxidant-antioxidant balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, up to February 2023 to identify relevant studies examining the association between Prooxidant anti-oxidant balance (PAB) and Malondialdehyde 1 levels with the risk of prenatal asphyxia. Only English studies were incorporated. The search terms used included Asphyxia, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Newborns, Prenatal, Oxidant antioxidant balance, and oxidative stress. A total of 13 studies were retrieved. Data regarding the standard mean difference (SMD) were collected, and a pooled SMD with 95%CI was calculated using a random-effect model to determine the strength of the relationship. Furthermore, the risk of publication bias was assessed through funnel plot and Egger's linear regression tests. Inclusion criteria was 1) The studies conducted on neonates, diagnosis and outcomes of prenatal asphyxia, oxidants and antioxidants were included. Research conducted on adults or on animals or review articles, and articles in which only their abstracts were available were excluded. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 980 searched articles, 13 articles (10 prospective articles and 3 cross-sectional articles) were studied. An increase in antioxidant enzymes (Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT) and Plasma superoxide dismutase (SOD)) cannot be dealt with excessive oxidants produced in the body (Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA), free radical products (F8-isoprostane and MDA), saturated fatty acids and % CoQ-10). Prooxidant anti-oxidant balance (PAB) levels among neonates who had asphyxia were announced to be two times higher than normal newborns. PAB values in neonates with asphyxia, who had adverse prognosis, were about three times higher than those with favorable prognosis. The sensitivity of PAB in predicting the prognosis of neonates with asphyxia was reported 83- 89% and its specificity was 71- 92%. The pooled SMD analysis revealed a significant association between PAB and MDA levels with the risk of prenatal asphyxia both overall (SMD = 1.447, 95%CI: 0.961-1.934, P < 0.001), as well as separately in subgroups of PAB (SMD = 1.134, 95%CI: 0.623-1.644, P < 0.001) and MDA (SMD = 1.910, 95%CI: 0.916-2.903, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis findings revealed the potential of evaluating antioxidant enzymes and oxidant agents, as well as assessing the balance between them (PAB), in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of neonatal asphyxia. The limitations of the present study included not having access to all related complete articles, lack of quality and usability in reports of some articles, and the different diagnostic methods of prenatal asphyxia in different studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11175,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733963264881231227112345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The mechanism of occurrence and complications of asphyxia change in the treatment process and the future prognosis of newborns. One of the discussed mechanisms is the disruption of oxidants to anti-oxidants balance. Therefore, the current study was conducted aiming to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the diagnosis and prognosis of prenatal asphyxia based on oxidant-antioxidant balance.

Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, up to February 2023 to identify relevant studies examining the association between Prooxidant anti-oxidant balance (PAB) and Malondialdehyde 1 levels with the risk of prenatal asphyxia. Only English studies were incorporated. The search terms used included Asphyxia, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Newborns, Prenatal, Oxidant antioxidant balance, and oxidative stress. A total of 13 studies were retrieved. Data regarding the standard mean difference (SMD) were collected, and a pooled SMD with 95%CI was calculated using a random-effect model to determine the strength of the relationship. Furthermore, the risk of publication bias was assessed through funnel plot and Egger's linear regression tests. Inclusion criteria was 1) The studies conducted on neonates, diagnosis and outcomes of prenatal asphyxia, oxidants and antioxidants were included. Research conducted on adults or on animals or review articles, and articles in which only their abstracts were available were excluded. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed.

Results: Out of 980 searched articles, 13 articles (10 prospective articles and 3 cross-sectional articles) were studied. An increase in antioxidant enzymes (Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT) and Plasma superoxide dismutase (SOD)) cannot be dealt with excessive oxidants produced in the body (Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA), free radical products (F8-isoprostane and MDA), saturated fatty acids and % CoQ-10). Prooxidant anti-oxidant balance (PAB) levels among neonates who had asphyxia were announced to be two times higher than normal newborns. PAB values in neonates with asphyxia, who had adverse prognosis, were about three times higher than those with favorable prognosis. The sensitivity of PAB in predicting the prognosis of neonates with asphyxia was reported 83- 89% and its specificity was 71- 92%. The pooled SMD analysis revealed a significant association between PAB and MDA levels with the risk of prenatal asphyxia both overall (SMD = 1.447, 95%CI: 0.961-1.934, P < 0.001), as well as separately in subgroups of PAB (SMD = 1.134, 95%CI: 0.623-1.644, P < 0.001) and MDA (SMD = 1.910, 95%CI: 0.916-2.903, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis findings revealed the potential of evaluating antioxidant enzymes and oxidant agents, as well as assessing the balance between them (PAB), in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of neonatal asphyxia. The limitations of the present study included not having access to all related complete articles, lack of quality and usability in reports of some articles, and the different diagnostic methods of prenatal asphyxia in different studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于抗氧化剂氧化平衡的产前窒息诊断和预后调查:来自系统回顾和元分析的证据。
导言:窒息的发生机制和并发症会随着新生儿的治疗过程和未来预后而发生变化。讨论的机制之一是氧化剂与抗氧化剂平衡的破坏。因此,本研究旨在对基于氧化剂-抗氧化剂平衡的产前窒息诊断和预后进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:方法:使用 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库(截至 2023 年 2 月)进行了全面的电子检索,以确定研究氧化剂-抗氧化剂平衡(PAB)和丙二醛 1 水平与产前窒息风险之间关系的相关研究。只纳入了英文研究。检索词包括窒息、诊断、预后、新生儿、产前、氧化剂抗氧化平衡和氧化应激。共检索到 13 项研究。研究人员收集了有关标准平均差(SMD)的数据,并使用随机效应模型计算了汇集的SMD和95%CI,以确定两者关系的强度。此外,还通过漏斗图和 Egger 线性回归测试评估了发表偏倚的风险。纳入标准为:1) 纳入对新生儿、产前窒息的诊断和结果、氧化剂和抗氧化剂进行的研究。不包括对成人或动物进行的研究、综述性文章以及只有摘要的文章。此外,还对所报告研究的质量进行了评估:在检索的 980 篇文章中,研究了 13 篇文章(10 篇前瞻性文章和 3 篇横断面文章)。抗氧化酶(谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和血浆超氧化物歧化酶(SOD))的增加无法应对体内产生的过多氧化剂(血浆和脑脊液中丙二醛(MDA)、自由基产物(F8-异前列腺烷和 MDA)、饱和脂肪酸和 CoQ-10 的百分比)。据公布,窒息新生儿的前氧化抗氧化平衡(PAB)水平是正常新生儿的两倍。预后不良的窒息新生儿的 Prooxidant 抗氧化平衡值是预后良好新生儿的三倍。据报道,PAB 预测窒息新生儿预后的敏感性为 83-89%,特异性为 71-92%。汇总的SMD分析显示,PAB和MDA水平与产前窒息风险之间存在显著关联,无论是总体关联(SMD = 1.447,95%CI:0.961-1.934,P <0.001),还是在PAB(SMD = 1.134,95%CI:0.623-1.644,P <0.001)和MDA(SMD = 1.910,95%CI:0.916-2.903,P <0.001)亚组中的单独关联:我们的荟萃分析结果揭示了评估抗氧化酶和氧化剂以及评估它们之间的平衡(PAB)在诊断和预测新生儿窒息预后方面的潜力。本研究的局限性包括:无法获得所有相关的完整文章、部分文章的报告缺乏质量和可用性,以及不同研究对产前窒息的诊断方法不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in pediatric medicine. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Quantitative Review of Un-licensed and Off-label Medicines Use in Children Aged 0-2 Years in the Private Sector in South Africa: Extent, Challenges, and Implications. Laryngeal Mask for Minimally-Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Narrative Review. Strategies for Pain Management after Extraction of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Clinical Picture, Diagnosis, Management of NEC, and Effects of Probiotics on its Prevention: A Narrative Review. Clinical Management of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1