An open-label, proof-of-concept study assessing the effects of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement on biofilm and microbial loads in patients with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Robert J Snyder, Adam J Singer, Cyaandi R Dove, Stephen Heisler, Howard Petusevsky, Garth James, Elinor deLancey Pulcini, Aya Ben Yaakov, Lior Rosenberg, Edward Grant, Yaron Shoham
{"title":"An open-label, proof-of-concept study assessing the effects of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement on biofilm and microbial loads in patients with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.","authors":"Robert J Snyder, Adam J Singer, Cyaandi R Dove, Stephen Heisler, Howard Petusevsky, Garth James, Elinor deLancey Pulcini, Aya Ben Yaakov, Lior Rosenberg, Edward Grant, Yaron Shoham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most chronic wounds contain biofilm, and debridement remains the centerpiece of treatment. Enzymatic debridement is an effective tool in removing nonviable tissue, however, there is little evidence supporting its effect on planktonic and biofilm bacteria.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effects of a novel BBD agent on removal of nonviable tissue, biofilm, and microbial loads in patients with chronic ulcers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve patients with DFU or VLU were treated with up to 8 once-daily applications of BBD and then followed for an additional 2 weeks. Punch biopsy specimens were collected and analyzed for biofilm, and fluorescence imaging was used to measure bacterial load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients completed treatment, and 7 achieved complete debridement within a median of 2 applications (range, 2-8). By the end of the 2-week follow-up period, the mean ± SD reduction in wound area was 35% ± 38. In all 6 patients who were positive for biofilm at baseline, the biofilm was reduced to single individual or no detected microorganisms by the end of treatment. Red fluorescence for Staphylococcus aureus decreased from a mean of 1.09 cm² ± 0.58 before treatment to 0.39 cm² ± 0.25 after treatment. BBD was safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary data suggest that BBD is safe and that it can be used to effectively debride DFU and VLU, reduce biofilm and planktonic bacterial load, and promote reduction in wound size.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most chronic wounds contain biofilm, and debridement remains the centerpiece of treatment. Enzymatic debridement is an effective tool in removing nonviable tissue, however, there is little evidence supporting its effect on planktonic and biofilm bacteria.

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of a novel BBD agent on removal of nonviable tissue, biofilm, and microbial loads in patients with chronic ulcers.

Materials and methods: Twelve patients with DFU or VLU were treated with up to 8 once-daily applications of BBD and then followed for an additional 2 weeks. Punch biopsy specimens were collected and analyzed for biofilm, and fluorescence imaging was used to measure bacterial load.

Results: Ten patients completed treatment, and 7 achieved complete debridement within a median of 2 applications (range, 2-8). By the end of the 2-week follow-up period, the mean ± SD reduction in wound area was 35% ± 38. In all 6 patients who were positive for biofilm at baseline, the biofilm was reduced to single individual or no detected microorganisms by the end of treatment. Red fluorescence for Staphylococcus aureus decreased from a mean of 1.09 cm² ± 0.58 before treatment to 0.39 cm² ± 0.25 after treatment. BBD was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that BBD is safe and that it can be used to effectively debride DFU and VLU, reduce biofilm and planktonic bacterial load, and promote reduction in wound size.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项开放标签、概念验证研究,评估基于菠萝蛋白酶的酶解清创疗法对静脉腿部溃疡和糖尿病足溃疡患者体内生物膜和微生物负荷的影响。
背景:大多数慢性伤口都含有生物膜,清创仍是治疗的核心。酶清创是清除无活力组织的有效工具,但很少有证据支持酶清创对浮游生物和生物膜细菌的作用:本研究评估了一种新型 BBD 药剂对慢性溃疡患者去除无活力组织、生物膜和微生物负荷的效果:12名DFU或VLU患者接受了最多8次的BBD治疗,每天一次,然后再随访2周。收集穿刺活检标本并分析生物膜,使用荧光成像技术测量细菌量:结果:10 名患者完成了治疗,其中 7 名患者在中位 2 次用药(范围为 2-8 次)后实现了彻底清创。在 2 周的随访期结束时,伤口面积的平均± SD 减少率为 35% ± 38。在基线生物膜阳性的 6 位患者中,到治疗结束时,生物膜已减少到单个微生物或未检测到微生物。金黄色葡萄球菌的红色荧光从治疗前的平均 1.09 cm² ± 0.58 下降到治疗后的 0.39 cm² ± 0.25。BBD 安全且耐受性良好:初步数据表明,BBD 是安全的,可用于有效去除 DFU 和 VLU,减少生物膜和浮游细菌量,并促进伤口缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Diving deep into healing: the promising role of fish skin in wound recovery. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evaluating the number of cellular and/or tissue-based product applications required to treat diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers in non-hospital outpatient department settings. Skin cancer or locally advanced mammary carcinoma: a discussion of cutaneous pathology on the male chest. Use of silver collagen oxidized regenerated cellulose dressings in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy: expert panel consensus recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1