Left-behind places in central and eastern Europe—labour productivity aspect

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1093/cjres/rsae001
Pawel Dobrzanski, Sebastian Bobowski, Karenjit Clare
{"title":"Left-behind places in central and eastern Europe—labour productivity aspect","authors":"Pawel Dobrzanski, Sebastian Bobowski, Karenjit Clare","doi":"10.1093/cjres/rsae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 21st century, there have already been a series of economic downturns, particularly the Subprime Crisis 2007–2009 and the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. All those events triggered changes in productivity, economic performance and structure. The main objective of this study is to identify the regions left behind in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries and to analyse the structural and productivity changes taking place within them. In our analysis, we aim to verify the research hypothesis that all left-behind regions in CEE have similar economic structures with a high share of agriculture. The research period covers the years from 2010 until 2020 using data from the Eurostat database. In the first phase of our analysis, we analysed employment, Gross Value Added (GVA) and productivity data for 11 CEE countries. Then, we analysed the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics at level 3 (NUTS3) regions, and Poland, which is a NUTS2 region. Left-behind regions are defined as those with low productivity and low growth rates. We provide a detailed analysis of the best and worst performing regions in terms of productivity for each country using productivity data and shift-share decomposition of productivity growth rate. Left-behind regions for each CEE country have been identified, and these are BG333, BG342, CZ080, EE004, HR023, HU332, LT027, LV005, PL72, RO216, RO312, SI032, SI035, SI038 and SK032. In our analysis, our hypothesis analysing the relationship between agriculture share in total employment and the productivity level of the region was not confirmed.","PeriodicalId":47897,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","volume":"390 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 21st century, there have already been a series of economic downturns, particularly the Subprime Crisis 2007–2009 and the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. All those events triggered changes in productivity, economic performance and structure. The main objective of this study is to identify the regions left behind in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries and to analyse the structural and productivity changes taking place within them. In our analysis, we aim to verify the research hypothesis that all left-behind regions in CEE have similar economic structures with a high share of agriculture. The research period covers the years from 2010 until 2020 using data from the Eurostat database. In the first phase of our analysis, we analysed employment, Gross Value Added (GVA) and productivity data for 11 CEE countries. Then, we analysed the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics at level 3 (NUTS3) regions, and Poland, which is a NUTS2 region. Left-behind regions are defined as those with low productivity and low growth rates. We provide a detailed analysis of the best and worst performing regions in terms of productivity for each country using productivity data and shift-share decomposition of productivity growth rate. Left-behind regions for each CEE country have been identified, and these are BG333, BG342, CZ080, EE004, HR023, HU332, LT027, LV005, PL72, RO216, RO312, SI032, SI035, SI038 and SK032. In our analysis, our hypothesis analysing the relationship between agriculture share in total employment and the productivity level of the region was not confirmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧和东欧的落后地区--劳动生产率方面
21 世纪已经出现了一系列经济衰退,特别是 2007-2009 年的次贷危机和 2020 年的 Covid-19 大流行病。所有这些事件都引发了生产力、经济表现和结构的变化。本研究的主要目的是确定中东欧(CEE)国家的落后地区,并分析这些地区的结构和生产力变化。在分析中,我们旨在验证研究假设,即中欧和东欧的所有落后地区都具有类似的经济结构,农业所占比重较高。研究时间跨度为 2010 年至 2020 年,数据来源于欧盟统计局数据库。在分析的第一阶段,我们分析了 11 个中欧和东欧国家的就业、增值总值 (GVA) 和生产率数据。然后,我们分析了第三级(NUTS3)地区和波兰(NUTS2)地区的 "统计用领土单位命名法"。落后地区是指那些生产率低、增长率低的地区。我们利用生产率数据和生产率增长率的转移份额分解,对各国生产率表现最好和最差的地区进行了详细分析。中欧和东欧各国的落后地区已经确定,它们是 BG333、BG342、CZ080、EE004、HR023、HU332、LT027、LV005、PL72、RO216、RO312、SI032、SI035、SI038 和 SK032。在我们的分析中,分析农业在总就业人数中所占比例与地区生产力水平之间关系的假设未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The polarisation of Italian metropolitan areas, 2000–2018: structural change, technology and growth Rural areas as winners of COVID-19, digitalization and remote working? Empirical evidence from recent internal migration in Germany Firm interconnectedness and resilience: evidence from the Italian manufacturing Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland Localised waste reduction networks, global destruction networks and the circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1