Remote hearing-aid delivery and support: perspectives of patients and their hearing care providers.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2304585
Matthew Blyth, Gabrielle H Saunders
{"title":"Remote hearing-aid delivery and support: perspectives of patients and their hearing care providers.","authors":"Matthew Blyth, Gabrielle H Saunders","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2304585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the perspectives of patients and hearing care providers (HCPs) about an adult remote hearing-aid delivery service implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Service evaluation via surveys. The patient survey measured satisfaction with the service, perceived hearing-aid handling skills, and preferences for future services. The HCP survey explored the impact of teleaudiology on outcomes compared to in-person care and factors important for successful teleaudiology.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>378 patients and 14 HCPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were highly satisfied with the service and self-reported good hearing-aid handling skills. However, 2 in 3 patients said they would prefer a future hearing-aid fitting to be in-person rather than remote. HCPs thought teleaudiology had positive impacts on convenience, accessibility, and flexibility, but negative impacts on communication, rapport, and the quality of care. HCPs considered computer literacy and individual preferences to be important for successful remote care; the age of the patient was considered less important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients were generally highly satisfied with the service and for 1 in 3 it was their preferred mode of future hearing-aid fitting. Future services should be aware that a one-size-fits-all approach will not satisfy all patients and that teleaudiology should be offered on the basis of individual preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"966-974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2304585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the perspectives of patients and hearing care providers (HCPs) about an adult remote hearing-aid delivery service implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Service evaluation via surveys. The patient survey measured satisfaction with the service, perceived hearing-aid handling skills, and preferences for future services. The HCP survey explored the impact of teleaudiology on outcomes compared to in-person care and factors important for successful teleaudiology.

Study sample: 378 patients and 14 HCPs.

Results: Patients were highly satisfied with the service and self-reported good hearing-aid handling skills. However, 2 in 3 patients said they would prefer a future hearing-aid fitting to be in-person rather than remote. HCPs thought teleaudiology had positive impacts on convenience, accessibility, and flexibility, but negative impacts on communication, rapport, and the quality of care. HCPs considered computer literacy and individual preferences to be important for successful remote care; the age of the patient was considered less important.

Conclusions: Patients were generally highly satisfied with the service and for 1 in 3 it was their preferred mode of future hearing-aid fitting. Future services should be aware that a one-size-fits-all approach will not satisfy all patients and that teleaudiology should be offered on the basis of individual preference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程助听器交付和支持:患者及其听力保健提供者的观点。
目的探讨患者和听力保健提供者(HCP)对在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的成人远程助听器交付服务的看法:设计:通过调查对服务进行评估。患者调查测量了对服务的满意度、对助听器操作技能的感知以及对未来服务的偏好。听力保健专业人员调查则探讨了远程听力对治疗效果的影响,以及远程听力成功的重要因素:研究样本:378 名患者和 14 名高级保健人员:结果:患者对服务非常满意,并自称具有良好的助听器操作技能。然而,每 3 位患者中就有 2 位表示,他们更希望今后的助听器验配能在现场进行,而不是远程进行。医疗保健人员认为远程听力学在便利性、可及性和灵活性方面有积极影响,但在沟通、融洽度和医疗质量方面有消极影响。医疗保健人员认为电脑知识和个人喜好对成功的远程医疗很重要,而患者的年龄则不那么重要:患者普遍对这项服务非常满意,三分之一的患者认为这是他们今后验配助听器的首选方式。未来的服务机构应该意识到,"一刀切 "的方式无法满足所有患者的需求,远程听力服务应根据个人偏好提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Tinnitus prevalence and associations with leisure noise exposure among Canadians, aged 6 to 79 years. Associated factors for parent-reported otitis media in 12-month-old infants. Comparison of subjective self-reported hearing and objective speech-in-noise perception as predictors of social isolation and loneliness in adults 60 years and older. Auditory brainstem response thresholds and functional hearing: implications for cochlear implant candidacy. Hearing aid adoption rates among adults without hearing aid experience in an audiology clinic before and after price unbundling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1