Effects of Health Responsibility Frames on Attributions, Emotions, and Social Support Intentions in the Context of Dementias.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2307204
Mara Berlekamp, Doreen Reifegerste, Linn Julia Temmann
{"title":"Effects of Health Responsibility Frames on Attributions, Emotions, and Social Support Intentions in the Context of Dementias.","authors":"Mara Berlekamp, Doreen Reifegerste, Linn Julia Temmann","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2307204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When news stories cover health and diseases, they often address issues of responsibility. These <i>responsibility frames</i> can affect recipients' responsibility beliefs (i.e., attributions) and thereby affect emotions and motivations to support people affected by health problems. To date, it is not fully understood how responsibility frames affect these attributions, emotions, and social support intentions in the context of dementia. In an online experiment with <i>N</i> = 1,059 German participants, we tested the effects of different responsibility frames (individual vs. contextual) on social support intentions through responsibility attributions and emotional reactions in the context of dementia. Results show that responsibility frames affect responsibility attributions and social support intentions. Mediation analysis shows that the effect of contextual responsibility frames on social support intention is partially mediated by responsibility attribution and emotions (sympathy and anger). We discuss these findings considering framing effects research and media coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"3159-3169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2307204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When news stories cover health and diseases, they often address issues of responsibility. These responsibility frames can affect recipients' responsibility beliefs (i.e., attributions) and thereby affect emotions and motivations to support people affected by health problems. To date, it is not fully understood how responsibility frames affect these attributions, emotions, and social support intentions in the context of dementia. In an online experiment with N = 1,059 German participants, we tested the effects of different responsibility frames (individual vs. contextual) on social support intentions through responsibility attributions and emotional reactions in the context of dementia. Results show that responsibility frames affect responsibility attributions and social support intentions. Mediation analysis shows that the effect of contextual responsibility frames on social support intention is partially mediated by responsibility attribution and emotions (sympathy and anger). We discuss these findings considering framing effects research and media coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症背景下健康责任框架对归因、情感和社会支持意愿的影响。
当新闻报道涉及健康和疾病时,往往会涉及责任问题。这些责任框架会影响受众的责任信念(即归因),从而影响他们的情绪和支持受健康问题影响者的动机。迄今为止,人们还不完全了解在痴呆症的背景下,责任框架是如何影响这些归因、情绪和社会支持意向的。在一项有 1,059 名德国参与者参加的在线实验中,我们测试了不同责任框架(个人与情境)在痴呆症情境下通过责任归因和情绪反应对社会支持意愿的影响。结果表明,责任框架会影响责任归因和社会支持意愿。中介分析表明,情境责任框架对社会支持意向的影响部分受到责任归因和情绪(同情和愤怒)的中介。考虑到框架效应研究和媒体报道,我们对这些发现进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
The COMFORT Model: Moving the Initiative Outside of the Academy. The Pursuit of Positive Impacts: Translating Longitudinal Cancer Studies into Successful Health Communication Interventions. Increasing Organ Donor Registrations in Motor Vehicles Offices Through Health Communication. Engagement with Adolescent Substance Prevention Messages: Impact and Dissemination of REAL Media. Podcasting as Storycrafting and Translational Health Communication Scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1