Decision rules for personalized statin treatment prescriptions over multi-objectives.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Experimental Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/15353702231220660
Pui Ying Yew, Yue Liang, Terrence J Adam, Julian Wolfson, Peter J Tonellato, Chih-Lin Chi
{"title":"Decision rules for personalized statin treatment prescriptions over multi-objectives.","authors":"Pui Ying Yew, Yue Liang, Terrence J Adam, Julian Wolfson, Peter J Tonellato, Chih-Lin Chi","doi":"10.1177/15353702231220660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In our previous study, we demonstrated the feasibility of producing a proactive statin prescription strategy - a personalized statin treatment plan (PSTP) - using neural networks with big data. However, its non-transparency limited result interpretations and clinical usability. To improve the transparency of our previous approach with minimal compromise to the maximal statin treatment benefit-to-risk ratio, this study proposed a five-step pipeline approach called the decision rules for statin treatment (DRST). Steps 1-3 of our proposed pipeline improved our previous PSTP model in optimizing individual benefit-to-risk ratio; Step 4 used a decision tree model (DRST) to provide straightforward rules in the initial statin treatment plan; Step 5 aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these decision rules by conducting a clinical trial simulation. We included 107,739 de-identified patient data from Optum Labs Database Warehouse in this study. The final decision rules were compact and efficient, resulting from a decision tree with only a maximum depth of 3 and 11 nodes. The DRST identified three factors that are easily obtainable at the point of care: age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and age-adjusted Charlson score. Moreover, it also identified six subpopulations that can benefit most from these decision rules. In our clinical trial simulations, DRST was found to improve statin benefit in LDL-C reduction by 4.15 percentage points (pp) and reduce risks of statin-associated symptoms (SAS) and statin discontinuation by 11.71 and 3.96 pp, respectively, when compared to the standard of care. Moreover, these DRST results were only less than 0.6 pp suboptimal to PSTP, demonstrating that building DRST that provide transparency with minimal compromise to the maximal benefit-to-risk ratio of statin treatments is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12163,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2526-2537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702231220660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our previous study, we demonstrated the feasibility of producing a proactive statin prescription strategy - a personalized statin treatment plan (PSTP) - using neural networks with big data. However, its non-transparency limited result interpretations and clinical usability. To improve the transparency of our previous approach with minimal compromise to the maximal statin treatment benefit-to-risk ratio, this study proposed a five-step pipeline approach called the decision rules for statin treatment (DRST). Steps 1-3 of our proposed pipeline improved our previous PSTP model in optimizing individual benefit-to-risk ratio; Step 4 used a decision tree model (DRST) to provide straightforward rules in the initial statin treatment plan; Step 5 aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these decision rules by conducting a clinical trial simulation. We included 107,739 de-identified patient data from Optum Labs Database Warehouse in this study. The final decision rules were compact and efficient, resulting from a decision tree with only a maximum depth of 3 and 11 nodes. The DRST identified three factors that are easily obtainable at the point of care: age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and age-adjusted Charlson score. Moreover, it also identified six subpopulations that can benefit most from these decision rules. In our clinical trial simulations, DRST was found to improve statin benefit in LDL-C reduction by 4.15 percentage points (pp) and reduce risks of statin-associated symptoms (SAS) and statin discontinuation by 11.71 and 3.96 pp, respectively, when compared to the standard of care. Moreover, these DRST results were only less than 0.6 pp suboptimal to PSTP, demonstrating that building DRST that provide transparency with minimal compromise to the maximal benefit-to-risk ratio of statin treatments is feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多目标个性化他汀类药物治疗处方的决策规则。
在我们之前的研究中,我们证明了利用神经网络和大数据制定主动他汀处方策略--个性化他汀治疗计划(PSTP)--的可行性。然而,这种方法的不透明性限制了结果的解释和临床可用性。为了提高以往方法的透明度,同时尽量不影响他汀治疗的最大收益风险比,本研究提出了一种五步流水线方法,即他汀治疗决策规则(DRST)。我们提出的流程中的第 1-3 步改进了之前的 PSTP 模型,优化了个体获益风险比;第 4 步使用决策树模型(DRST)为初始他汀治疗计划提供了简单明了的规则;第 5 步旨在通过进行临床试验模拟来评估这些决策规则的有效性。在这项研究中,我们纳入了 Optum 实验室数据库仓库中 107,739 个去标识化的患者数据。最终的决策规则紧凑高效,决策树的最大深度仅为 3,节点数为 11。DRST 确定了三个在护理点很容易获得的因素:年龄、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平和年龄调整后的 Charlson 评分。此外,它还确定了最能从这些决策规则中获益的六个亚人群。在我们的临床试验模拟中发现,与标准治疗相比,DRST 可将他汀类药物在降低 LDL-C 方面的获益提高 4.15 个百分点(pp),并将他汀类药物相关症状(SAS)和他汀类药物停用的风险分别降低 11.71 个百分点和 3.96 个百分点。此外,这些 DRST 结果仅比 PSTP 差不到 0.6 个百分点,这表明建立 DRST 是可行的,它能在最大限度地降低他汀类药物治疗的最大收益风险比的同时提供透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Experimental Biology and Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Biology and Medicine (EBM) is a global, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the biomedical sciences. EBM provides both research and review articles as well as meeting symposia and brief communications. Articles in EBM represent cutting edge research at the overlapping junctions of the biological, physical and engineering sciences that impact upon the health and welfare of the world''s population. Topics covered in EBM include: Anatomy/Pathology; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Bioimaging; Biomedical Engineering; Bionanoscience; Cell and Developmental Biology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; Environmental Health/Biomarkers/Precision Medicine; Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics; Immunology/Microbiology/Virology; Mechanisms of Aging; Neuroscience; Pharmacology and Toxicology; Physiology; Stem Cell Biology; Structural Biology; Systems Biology and Microphysiological Systems; and Translational Research.
期刊最新文献
STEMIN and YAP5SA, the future of heart repair? Fructose metabolism is unregulated in cancers and placentae. Subunit-specific mechanisms of isoflurane-induced acute tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus granule neuron. Quantitative characterization of retinal features in translated OCTA. Exosomal circPTPRK promotes angiogenesis after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1