[Standardized risk-based antibiotic prophylaxis and adhesive film dressing for the prevention of wound infection following cochlear implantation].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Hno Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s00106-024-01423-0
Stefan Lyutenski, Susanne Wendt, Anja Lieder, Paul James, Marc Bloching
{"title":"[Standardized risk-based antibiotic prophylaxis and adhesive film dressing for the prevention of wound infection following cochlear implantation].","authors":"Stefan Lyutenski, Susanne Wendt, Anja Lieder, Paul James, Marc Bloching","doi":"10.1007/s00106-024-01423-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no consensus in the pertinent literature regarding the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for cochlear implantation (CI). This study evaluates the implementation of standardized risk-based AP combined with application of an adhesive film dressing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All CI cases since September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative wound complications. While all patients received preoperative AP with ceftriaxone, postoperative AP after CI in patients older than 7 years was no longer routinely performed in our clinic. Exceptions were made according to predefined criteria for an increased risk of infection. The wound was covered with a transparent adhesive polyurethane film.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 72% of the 219 cases, we did not perform postoperative AP. The overall wound complication rate was 2.7% (in the groups with and without postoperative AP, 4.9% and 1.9%, respectively). Wound infection did not occur in any of the patients without postoperative AP older than 70 years (n = 32), with controlled diabetes mellitus (n = 19), or with reimplantation due to technical defect (n = 19). The film did not need to be changed until the suture material was removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized risk-based AP can avoid prolonged administration of antibiotics in selected patients. The film dressing permits continual examination and sufficient wound protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55052,"journal":{"name":"Hno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hno","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-024-01423-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus in the pertinent literature regarding the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for cochlear implantation (CI). This study evaluates the implementation of standardized risk-based AP combined with application of an adhesive film dressing.

Materials and methods: All CI cases since September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative wound complications. While all patients received preoperative AP with ceftriaxone, postoperative AP after CI in patients older than 7 years was no longer routinely performed in our clinic. Exceptions were made according to predefined criteria for an increased risk of infection. The wound was covered with a transparent adhesive polyurethane film.

Results: In 72% of the 219 cases, we did not perform postoperative AP. The overall wound complication rate was 2.7% (in the groups with and without postoperative AP, 4.9% and 1.9%, respectively). Wound infection did not occur in any of the patients without postoperative AP older than 70 years (n = 32), with controlled diabetes mellitus (n = 19), or with reimplantation due to technical defect (n = 19). The film did not need to be changed until the suture material was removed.

Conclusion: Standardized risk-based AP can avoid prolonged administration of antibiotics in selected patients. The film dressing permits continual examination and sufficient wound protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[基于风险的标准化抗生素预防和胶膜敷料用于预防人工耳蜗植入术后的伤口感染]。
背景:关于人工耳蜗植入术(CI)的最佳抗生素预防(AP),相关文献尚未达成共识。本研究评估了基于风险的标准化抗生素预防结合胶膜敷料的实施情况:对 2019 年 9 月以来的所有 CI 病例进行了术后伤口并发症回顾性审查。虽然所有患者术前都接受了头孢曲松 AP,但在我们的诊所,7 岁以上患者 CI 术后 AP 已不再是常规操作。根据预先确定的感染风险增加标准,我们将例外处理。伤口用透明的聚氨酯胶膜覆盖:在 219 个病例中,72% 的病例没有进行术后 AP。总体伤口并发症发生率为 2.7%(术后 AP 组和未进行 AP 组的并发症发生率分别为 4.9% 和 1.9%)。在未进行术后 AP 的患者中,年龄超过 70 岁(32 人)、糖尿病得到控制(19 人)或因技术缺陷再次植入(19 人)的患者均未发生伤口感染。结论:结论:基于风险的标准化 AP 可以避免对特定患者长时间使用抗生素。薄膜敷料允许持续检查和充分保护伤口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hno
Hno 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: HNO is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all ENT specialists in practices and clinics dealing with all aspects of ENT medicine, e.g. prevention, diagnostic methods, complication management, modern therapy strategies and surgical procedures. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of ENT medicine. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[The LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire : An analysis of multicentre data of children after early bilateral cochlear implant placement]. [Recurrent syncope : When does the otorhinolaryngologist get involved?] [Pitfalls in the diagnosis of house dust mite allergy]. [Pulsed DPOAEs in serial measurements : Combined analysis paradigm of simultaneously occurring changes in hearing thresholds and DPOAEs. German version]. [Trauma of the midface : Symptoms, diagnostics and treatment].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1