Treatment of glucocorticoid- induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients - a systematic review and meta- analysis.

Tristan Struja, Neele Nitritz, Islay Alexander, Kevin Kupferschmid, Jason F Hafner, Carlos C Spagnuolo, Philipp Schuetz, Beat Mueller, Claudine A Blum
{"title":"Treatment of glucocorticoid- induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients - a systematic review and meta- analysis.","authors":"Tristan Struja, Neele Nitritz, Islay Alexander, Kevin Kupferschmid, Jason F Hafner, Carlos C Spagnuolo, Philipp Schuetz, Beat Mueller, Claudine A Blum","doi":"10.1186/s40842-023-00158-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent issue, however there are no specific guidelines for this diabetes subtype. Although treat-to-target insulin is recommended in general to correct hyperglycemia, it remains unclear which treatment strategy has a positive effect on outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether treating GC-induced hyperglycemia improves clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for RCTs on adults reporting treatment and outcomes of GC-induced hyperglycemia since the beginning of the data bases until October 21, 2023. Glucose-lowering strategies as compared to usual care were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 17 RCTs with 808 patients and included seven trials in the quantitative analysis. Patients with an intensive glucose-lowering strategy had lower standardized mean glucose levels of - 0.29 mmol/l (95%CI -0.64 to -0.05) compared to usual care group patients. There was no increase in hypoglycemic events in the intensively treated groups (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.70-1.17). Overall, we did not have enough trials reporting clinical outcomes for a quantitative analysis with only one trial reporting mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In GC-induced hyperglycemia, tight glucose control has a moderate effect on mean glucose levels with no apparent harmful effect regarding hypoglycemia. There is insufficient data whether insulin treatment improves clinical outcomes, and data on non-insulin based treatment regimens are currently too sparse to draw any conclusions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Registered as CRD42020147409 at PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ) on April 28, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":56339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","volume":"10 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10821212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-023-00158-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent issue, however there are no specific guidelines for this diabetes subtype. Although treat-to-target insulin is recommended in general to correct hyperglycemia, it remains unclear which treatment strategy has a positive effect on outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether treating GC-induced hyperglycemia improves clinical outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for RCTs on adults reporting treatment and outcomes of GC-induced hyperglycemia since the beginning of the data bases until October 21, 2023. Glucose-lowering strategies as compared to usual care were investigated.

Results: We found 17 RCTs with 808 patients and included seven trials in the quantitative analysis. Patients with an intensive glucose-lowering strategy had lower standardized mean glucose levels of - 0.29 mmol/l (95%CI -0.64 to -0.05) compared to usual care group patients. There was no increase in hypoglycemic events in the intensively treated groups (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.70-1.17). Overall, we did not have enough trials reporting clinical outcomes for a quantitative analysis with only one trial reporting mortality.

Conclusion: In GC-induced hyperglycemia, tight glucose control has a moderate effect on mean glucose levels with no apparent harmful effect regarding hypoglycemia. There is insufficient data whether insulin treatment improves clinical outcomes, and data on non-insulin based treatment regimens are currently too sparse to draw any conclusions.

Systematic review registration: Registered as CRD42020147409 at PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ) on April 28, 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人糖皮质激素诱发高血糖的治疗--系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:糖皮质激素(GC)诱导的高血糖是一个常见问题,但目前还没有针对这种糖尿病亚型的具体指南。虽然一般建议使用胰岛素靶向治疗来纠正高血糖,但目前仍不清楚哪种治疗策略对疗效有积极影响。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估治疗 GC 引起的高血糖是否能改善临床疗效:方法:系统检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中自数据库建立之初至2023年10月21日期间报告GC诱导的高血糖治疗和结果的成人RCT。研究了降糖策略与常规治疗的比较:结果:我们找到了 17 项 RCT,共 808 名患者,并将 7 项试验纳入了定量分析。与常规护理组患者相比,采用强化降糖策略的患者的标准化平均血糖水平较低,为-0.29 mmol/l(95%CI -0.64至-0.05)。强化治疗组的低血糖事件没有增加(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.70-1.17)。总体而言,我们没有足够的试验报告临床结果,无法进行定量分析,只有一项试验报告了死亡率:结论:在 GC 诱导的高血糖中,严格控制血糖对平均血糖水平的影响适中,对低血糖没有明显的有害影响。胰岛素治疗是否能改善临床预后的数据尚不充分,非胰岛素治疗方案的数据目前也太少,无法得出任何结论:2020年4月28日在PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ )注册为CRD42020147409。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology is an open access journal publishing within the field of diabetes and endocrine disease. The journal aims to provide a widely available resource for people working within the field of diabetes and endocrinology, in order to improve the care of people affected by these conditions. The audience includes, but is not limited to, physicians, researchers, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, podiatrists, psychologists, epidemiologists, exercise physiologists and health care researchers. Research articles include patient-based research (clinical trials, clinical studies, and others), translational research (translation of basic science to clinical practice, translation of clinical practice to policy and others), as well as epidemiology and health care research. Clinical articles include case reports, case seminars, consensus statements, clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Only articles considered to contribute new knowledge to the field will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes distress and associated factors among adults with diabetes mellitus residing in a metropolitan city of India: a community-based study. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Nigeria. Adherence to diabetic retinopathy screening among children and young adults in Bangladesh. From adiposity to steatosis: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a hepatic expression of metabolic syndrome - current insights and future directions. Does EFSA statement on Monacolin content of nutraceutical combinations impair their lipid lowering effect? The LopiGLIK experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1