(Mis)alignment between facial and textual emotions and its effects on donors engagement behavior in online crowdsourcing platforms

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s11747-024-01002-3
Elham Yazdani, Anindita Chakravarty, Jeff Inman
{"title":"(Mis)alignment between facial and textual emotions and its effects on donors engagement behavior in online crowdsourcing platforms","authors":"Elham Yazdani, Anindita Chakravarty, Jeff Inman","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01002-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although textual and facial emotion expressions in prosocial appeals have been studied separately in past research, there has been little work on the misalignment (compared to alignment) between them. Using a multi-method approach comprising experiments and panel data of 6,098 crowdfunding projects from Gofundme, we investigate how emotions expressed in the cover image and the project description interact to increase potential donors’ engagement as measured by metrics relevant to the platform, i.e., donation amount per donor. More specifically, we focus on the misalignment (vs. alignment) between happy and sad facial expressions in images and the positive and negative emotions in the project description. Our empirical analysis shows that misalignment scenarios have a bigger positive impact on the donor’s contributed amount, compared to alignment scenarios. We also show that such a relative impact is heterogeneous and differs based on expressed urgency, beneficiary age, and progress towards donation goal. We make a theoretical contribution via assessing the extent of cognitive processing in misalignment vs alignment cases. We propose situations with a tradeoff such that the extent of cognitive processing of multimodal information content can be reduced due to simultaneous activation of affective processing. Our research provides strategic recommendations for platforms to increase donors’ engagement and platform revenue management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01002-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although textual and facial emotion expressions in prosocial appeals have been studied separately in past research, there has been little work on the misalignment (compared to alignment) between them. Using a multi-method approach comprising experiments and panel data of 6,098 crowdfunding projects from Gofundme, we investigate how emotions expressed in the cover image and the project description interact to increase potential donors’ engagement as measured by metrics relevant to the platform, i.e., donation amount per donor. More specifically, we focus on the misalignment (vs. alignment) between happy and sad facial expressions in images and the positive and negative emotions in the project description. Our empirical analysis shows that misalignment scenarios have a bigger positive impact on the donor’s contributed amount, compared to alignment scenarios. We also show that such a relative impact is heterogeneous and differs based on expressed urgency, beneficiary age, and progress towards donation goal. We make a theoretical contribution via assessing the extent of cognitive processing in misalignment vs alignment cases. We propose situations with a tradeoff such that the extent of cognitive processing of multimodal information content can be reduced due to simultaneous activation of affective processing. Our research provides strategic recommendations for platforms to increase donors’ engagement and platform revenue management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(面部情绪与文本情绪之间的(错误)吻合及其对在线众包平台中捐赠者参与行为的影响
虽然在过去的研究中对亲社会呼吁中的文字和面部情绪表达分别进行了研究,但很少有研究对它们之间的错位(与对齐相比)进行研究。我们采用多种方法,包括实验和来自 Gofundme 的 6,098 个众筹项目的面板数据,研究了封面图片和项目描述中表达的情感如何相互作用,以提高潜在捐赠者的参与度(通过与平台相关的指标(即每位捐赠者的捐赠金额)来衡量)。更具体地说,我们关注图片中快乐和悲伤的面部表情与项目描述中积极和消极情绪之间的错位(与对位)。我们的实证分析表明,与对齐情景相比,错位情景对捐赠者的捐赠金额有更大的积极影响。我们还表明,这种相对影响是异质的,根据所表达的紧迫性、受益人年龄和实现捐赠目标的进度而有所不同。我们通过评估不对齐与对齐情况下的认知处理程度做出了理论贡献。我们提出了一种权衡情况,即由于同时激活了情感处理,多模态信息内容的认知处理程度可以降低。我们的研究为平台提高捐赠者参与度和平台收入管理提供了战略建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses The paradox of product scarcity: Catalyzing the speed of innovation diffusion Recycle right: How to decrease recycling contamination with informational point-of-disposal signage The Taguchi approach to large-scale experimental designs: A powerful and efficient tool for advancing marketing theory and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1