Scenario-based techno-economic analysis of pumped denitrification bioreactors

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Water Resources and Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.wre.2024.100238
Lindsey M. Hartfiel , Carolina Díaz-García , Laura E. Christianson , Michelle L. Soupir
{"title":"Scenario-based techno-economic analysis of pumped denitrification bioreactors","authors":"Lindsey M. Hartfiel ,&nbsp;Carolina Díaz-García ,&nbsp;Laura E. Christianson ,&nbsp;Michelle L. Soupir","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2024.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pumped denitrification bioreactors are currently being assessed in the field to extend the use of traditional, subsurface drainage bioreactors. Pumped bioreactors for the treatment of drainage ditches, surface waters, and cisterns intercepting drainage were evaluated to provide a basis of the unit cost of bioreactor operation ($ kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>) under a variety of scenarios. The unit costs were modeled using a techno-economic analysis. The variables assessed in the analysis included nitrate removal rate, bioreactor lifespan, and operating periods, which were assumed. To evaluate the impact of these variables on the unit cost, a sensitivity analysis was conducted where one variable was adjusted (e.g., lifespan) while the other variables were kept the same as a traditional bioreactor. The cistern and supplemental surface water bioreactors were larger in size and had similar unit costs ranging from ∼$5 to $27 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup> for all scenarios except for the low mass removal and worst-case scenarios. The smaller, ditch diversion bioreactor had unit costs in the best- and worst-case scenarios in the range of $24 to $619 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A breakeven analysis indicated increasing the mass removal rate of the bioreactors and ensuring an operating period greater than 6-months had the greatest impact on reducing the unit cost compared to a traditional bioreactor. Overall, the larger-scale surface water and cistern bioreactors had comparable, but slightly higher, unit costs than traditional bioreactors under most scenarios evaluated. This information can be used to optimize and inform of the potential of pumped bioreactor systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021/pdfft?md5=56a8c2583548dcf3c650bd969c991a27&pid=1-s2.0-S2212428424000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pumped denitrification bioreactors are currently being assessed in the field to extend the use of traditional, subsurface drainage bioreactors. Pumped bioreactors for the treatment of drainage ditches, surface waters, and cisterns intercepting drainage were evaluated to provide a basis of the unit cost of bioreactor operation ($ kg NO3–N removed−1) under a variety of scenarios. The unit costs were modeled using a techno-economic analysis. The variables assessed in the analysis included nitrate removal rate, bioreactor lifespan, and operating periods, which were assumed. To evaluate the impact of these variables on the unit cost, a sensitivity analysis was conducted where one variable was adjusted (e.g., lifespan) while the other variables were kept the same as a traditional bioreactor. The cistern and supplemental surface water bioreactors were larger in size and had similar unit costs ranging from ∼$5 to $27 kg NO3–N removed−1 for all scenarios except for the low mass removal and worst-case scenarios. The smaller, ditch diversion bioreactor had unit costs in the best- and worst-case scenarios in the range of $24 to $619 kg NO3–N removed−1, respectively. A breakeven analysis indicated increasing the mass removal rate of the bioreactors and ensuring an operating period greater than 6-months had the greatest impact on reducing the unit cost compared to a traditional bioreactor. Overall, the larger-scale surface water and cistern bioreactors had comparable, but slightly higher, unit costs than traditional bioreactors under most scenarios evaluated. This information can be used to optimize and inform of the potential of pumped bioreactor systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于情景的抽水脱硝生物反应器技术经济分析
目前正在对抽水反硝化生物反应器进行实地评估,以扩大传统的地下排水生物反应器的使用范围。对用于处理排水沟、地表水和拦截排水的蓄水池的抽水式生物反应器进行了评估,以便为各种情况下生物反应器的单位运行成本(去除 NO3-N 公斤数-1 美元)提供依据。单位成本是通过技术经济分析建模得出的。分析中评估的变量包括硝酸盐去除率、生物反应器寿命和假定的运行期。为评估这些变量对单位成本的影响,进行了敏感性分析,即调整一个变量(如寿命),而其他变量保持与传统生物反应器相同。蓄水池和补充地表水生物反应器的体积较大,除低去除率和最坏情况外,在所有情况下的单位成本都差不多,从 5 美元到 27 美元不等,去除的 NO3-N 公斤数为 1。较小的沟渠分流生物反应器在最佳和最坏情况下的单位成本分别为 24 美元至 619 美元千克 NO3-N 去除率-1。盈亏平衡分析表明,与传统生物反应器相比,提高生物反应器的质量去除率并确保超过 6 个月的运行期对降低单位成本的影响最大。总体而言,在大多数评估方案下,大型地表水和蓄水池生物反应器的单位成本与传统生物反应器相当,但略高于后者。这些信息可用于优化抽水生物反应器系统并为其潜力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources and Economics
Water Resources and Economics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale. Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of: Aquatic ecosystem services- Blue economy- Climate change and flood risk management- Climate smart agriculture- Coastal management- Droughts and water scarcity- Environmental flows- Eutrophication- Food, water, energy nexus- Groundwater management- Hydropower generation- Hydrological risks and uncertainties- Marine resources- Nature-based solutions- Resource recovery- River restoration- Storm water harvesting- Transboundary water allocation- Urban water management- Wastewater treatment- Watershed management- Water health risks- Water pollution- Water quality management- Water security- Water stress- Water technology innovation.
期刊最新文献
Identifying optimal funding allocations for public water infrastructure improvements under uncertainty Interregional watershed services: Valuation of the benefits of controlled embankment breaches to manage urban flood risk Sensitivity of water reallocation performance assessments to water use data Impacts of intermittent water supply on household electricity demand: An econometric analysis for the Pune Metropolitan Region, India Capturing the drivers of crop water footprints in Africa and its spatial patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1