Peer effects in weight-related behaviours of young people: A systematic literature review

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Human Biology Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101354
Nathalie Müller , Francesco Fallucchi , Marc Suhrcke
{"title":"Peer effects in weight-related behaviours of young people: A systematic literature review","authors":"Nathalie Müller ,&nbsp;Francesco Fallucchi ,&nbsp;Marc Suhrcke","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individual preferences and beliefs are perpetually shaped by environmental influences, with peers playing a key role in this dynamic process. Compelling evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies has highlighted the significant impact of peer influence on health-related decisions. This systematic literature review<span><span> critically synthesises findings from 45 studies published between 2011 and 2022, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nature of peer effects on dietary, </span>physical activity and sleep behaviours during youth. The majority of studies indicated that social norms drive directional changes in eating and physical activity. Yet, our analysis revealed a notable gap in exploring alternative mechanisms, including social comparison and social identity, despite their potential relevance. Studies, generally classified as moderate to high quality, predominantly relied on self-reported data, potentially affecting the validity and reliability of measures. Meta-regression analyses suggest a small, but significant association of sample size with the magnitude, sign and significance of the reported peer effects. Moreover, studies focusing on physical activity are more likely to report significant outcomes, whereas findings on peer influence on sleep-related studies tend to reveal less pronounced effects, compared to studies on dietary behaviours. Experimental designs do not appear to increase the likelihood of finding significant effects when compared to other study designs. In conclusion, this synthesis emphasises the need for further research into the underlying mechanisms on peer effects to better inform policy-makers in designing effective policies for improving weight-related behaviours in young people.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50554,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Human Biology","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual preferences and beliefs are perpetually shaped by environmental influences, with peers playing a key role in this dynamic process. Compelling evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies has highlighted the significant impact of peer influence on health-related decisions. This systematic literature review critically synthesises findings from 45 studies published between 2011 and 2022, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nature of peer effects on dietary, physical activity and sleep behaviours during youth. The majority of studies indicated that social norms drive directional changes in eating and physical activity. Yet, our analysis revealed a notable gap in exploring alternative mechanisms, including social comparison and social identity, despite their potential relevance. Studies, generally classified as moderate to high quality, predominantly relied on self-reported data, potentially affecting the validity and reliability of measures. Meta-regression analyses suggest a small, but significant association of sample size with the magnitude, sign and significance of the reported peer effects. Moreover, studies focusing on physical activity are more likely to report significant outcomes, whereas findings on peer influence on sleep-related studies tend to reveal less pronounced effects, compared to studies on dietary behaviours. Experimental designs do not appear to increase the likelihood of finding significant effects when compared to other study designs. In conclusion, this synthesis emphasises the need for further research into the underlying mechanisms on peer effects to better inform policy-makers in designing effective policies for improving weight-related behaviours in young people.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年体重相关行为中的同伴效应:系统文献综述
个人的偏好和信念长期受环境影响,而同伴在这一动态过程中发挥着关键作用。来自定性和定量研究的有力证据凸显了同伴影响对健康相关决策的重大影响。本系统性文献综述对 2011 年至 2022 年间发表的 45 项研究结果进行了批判性综合,全面了解了青少年时期同伴对饮食、体育锻炼和睡眠行为影响的性质。大多数研究表明,社会规范推动了饮食和体育锻炼的方向性变化。然而,我们的分析表明,尽管社会比较和社会认同等其他机制具有潜在的相关性,但在探索这些机制方面还存在明显的差距。一般被归类为中等至高质量的研究主要依赖于自我报告数据,这可能会影响测量的有效性和可靠性。元回归分析表明,样本大小与所报告的同伴效应的程度、符号和显著性有微小但显著的联系。此外,以体育锻炼为重点的研究更有可能报告出显著的结果,而与饮食行为研究相比,睡眠相关研究中同伴影响的结果往往不那么明显。与其他研究设计相比,实验设计似乎不会增加发现显著效果的可能性。总之,本综述强调有必要进一步研究同伴影响的内在机制,以便更好地为政策制定者提供信息,帮助他们设计有效的政策来遏制青少年与体重有关的不健康行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economics & Human Biology
Economics & Human Biology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics and Human Biology is devoted to the exploration of the effect of socio-economic processes on human beings as biological organisms. Research covered in this (quarterly) interdisciplinary journal is not bound by temporal or geographic limitations.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Migrant well-being in Australia: Does locus of control matter? Does early-life famine exposure lead to healthy later-life dietary behavior: Evidence from the great Chinese famine Employee well-being in the digital age: Assessing the impacts of a smartphone application in the workplace Fiscal externalities and underinvestment in early-life human capital: Optimal policy instruments for a developing country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1