Reputational enablers for supplier diversity: An exploratory approach on the inclusion of war veterans and disabled people

IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100898
Camila Lee Park, Mauro Fracarolli Nunes, Jose A.D. Machuca
{"title":"Reputational enablers for supplier diversity: An exploratory approach on the inclusion of war veterans and disabled people","authors":"Camila Lee Park, Mauro Fracarolli Nunes, Jose A.D. Machuca","doi":"10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates whether the inclusion of war veterans and disabled people in supplier diversity programs grants firms with reputational gains. With preliminary evidence collected in the <em>content analysis</em> of supplier diversity programs and diverse groups considered by S&amp;P500's top 100 companies, we conducted a duo-factorial scenario-based experiment with a multi-stakeholder approach, exploring the reactions of the general public, customers, investors, and potential suppliers to these initiatives. In particular, we analyse whether their views on companies' benevolence and competence (trust) are affected. We also investigate the potential impacts on these stakeholders' overall attitude towards firms, as the construct represents a proxy of corporate reputation. The empirical results show that including these groups does not impact the way companies are perceived, suggesting that the communication of supplier diversity programs is not always efficient in creating positive images (e.g., greenwashing, social washing). We discuss these outcomes in the context of stakeholder theory and in the debate contrasting the strategic and moral incentives for adopting supplier diversity programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether the inclusion of war veterans and disabled people in supplier diversity programs grants firms with reputational gains. With preliminary evidence collected in the content analysis of supplier diversity programs and diverse groups considered by S&P500's top 100 companies, we conducted a duo-factorial scenario-based experiment with a multi-stakeholder approach, exploring the reactions of the general public, customers, investors, and potential suppliers to these initiatives. In particular, we analyse whether their views on companies' benevolence and competence (trust) are affected. We also investigate the potential impacts on these stakeholders' overall attitude towards firms, as the construct represents a proxy of corporate reputation. The empirical results show that including these groups does not impact the way companies are perceived, suggesting that the communication of supplier diversity programs is not always efficient in creating positive images (e.g., greenwashing, social washing). We discuss these outcomes in the context of stakeholder theory and in the debate contrasting the strategic and moral incentives for adopting supplier diversity programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应商多样性的声誉促进因素:探索将退伍军人和残疾人纳入其中的方法
本研究探讨了将退伍军人和残疾人纳入供应商多元化计划是否会给企业带来声誉上的好处。通过对 S&P500 前 100 强企业的供应商多元化计划和多元化群体的内容分析收集到的初步证据,我们采用多利益相关者的方法进行了一个双因素情景实验,探索公众、客户、投资者和潜在供应商对这些举措的反应。特别是,我们分析了他们对公司的仁慈和能力(信任)的看法是否会受到影响。我们还调查了这些利益相关者对企业总体态度的潜在影响,因为这一概念代表了企业声誉。实证结果表明,纳入这些群体并不会影响人们对公司的看法,这表明供应商多元化计划的传播并不总是能有效地塑造正面形象(例如,绿色洗涤、社会洗涤)。我们将结合利益相关者理论以及采用供应商多元化计划的战略动机和道德动机对比辩论来讨论这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
18.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management is to publish original, high-quality research within the field of purchasing and supply management (PSM). Articles should have a significant impact on PSM theory and practice. The Journal ensures that high quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase and supply of goods and services in industry, commerce, local, national, and regional government, health and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board From checking the box to driving impact – Perspectives on how to develop a supplier diversity program that is less narrowly scoped and more wholeheartedly adopted The circular business models of third-party loop operators: An activity-based view on performing activities internally or externally Establishing buyer-supplier self-organization through LSP brokered learning and information technologies: The effects on relational performance in logistic service triads Closing the loop: The fundamental role of Purchasing and Supply Management in reaching a circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1