Digital Approaches to Societal Grand Challenges: Toward a Broader Research Agenda on Managing Global-Local Design Tensions

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1287/isre.2023.0152
Satish Nambisan, Gerard George
{"title":"Digital Approaches to Societal Grand Challenges: Toward a Broader Research Agenda on Managing Global-Local Design Tensions","authors":"Satish Nambisan, Gerard George","doi":"10.1287/isre.2023.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy/Practice-Focused AbstractDespite considerable and continued resource investments, effective solutions to broad-scope problems of social interest or societal grand challenges (GCs) have proven to be elusive in many domains. In multiactor situations that characterize GCs, divergent goals, needs, priorities, and capabilities of global and local actors create organizing design tensions that need to be considered before solutions can be enacted. Emergent digital technologies can play an important and transformative role in addressing the organizing design tensions that pervade such collective action problems. In this article, we draw on Elinor Ostrom’s principles of public value creation and identify a set of eight organizing design tensions that arise from employing global and local perspectives in addressing GCs. We consider novel digital approaches—that involve alternative arrangements of digital and socio-political elements in GC settings—to resolving each of these design tensions. Our discussion foreshadows the considerable opportunity for information systems research to contribute to the broader dialog on GCs; inform GC-related policy and practice at global and local levels; and, more broadly, speed the identification and enactment of effective solutions to grand challenges.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy/Practice-Focused AbstractDespite considerable and continued resource investments, effective solutions to broad-scope problems of social interest or societal grand challenges (GCs) have proven to be elusive in many domains. In multiactor situations that characterize GCs, divergent goals, needs, priorities, and capabilities of global and local actors create organizing design tensions that need to be considered before solutions can be enacted. Emergent digital technologies can play an important and transformative role in addressing the organizing design tensions that pervade such collective action problems. In this article, we draw on Elinor Ostrom’s principles of public value creation and identify a set of eight organizing design tensions that arise from employing global and local perspectives in addressing GCs. We consider novel digital approaches—that involve alternative arrangements of digital and socio-political elements in GC settings—to resolving each of these design tensions. Our discussion foreshadows the considerable opportunity for information systems research to contribute to the broader dialog on GCs; inform GC-related policy and practice at global and local levels; and, more broadly, speed the identification and enactment of effective solutions to grand challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以数字化方法应对社会大挑战:迈向管理全球-本地设计紧张关系的更广泛研究议程
以政策/实践为重点 摘要尽管投入了大量持续不断的资源,但事实证明,在许多领域,要有效解决涉及社会利益的广泛问题或社会重大挑战(GCs)却很难。在作为 GCs 特点的多行为主体情况下,全球和地方行为主体的不同目标、需求、优先事项和能力造成了组织设计上的紧张关系,需要在制定解决方案之前加以考虑。新兴数字技术可以在解决此类集体行动问题中普遍存在的组织设计紧张关系方面发挥重要的变革作用。在本文中,我们借鉴了埃莉诺-奥斯特罗姆(Elinor Ostrom)的公共价值创造原则,并确定了在解决全球共同行动问题时采用全球和地方视角所产生的八种组织设计紧张关系。我们考虑了新颖的数字方法--这些方法涉及在全球协同环境中数字和社会政治元素的替代安排--以解决每一种设计紧张关系。我们的讨论预示着信息系统研究将有大量机会为有关全球挑战的更广泛对话做出贡献;为全球和地方层面与全球挑战相关的政策和实践提供信息;更广泛地说,加快确定和制定应对重大挑战的有效解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
Win by Hook or Crook? Self-Injecting Favorable Online Reviews to Fight Adjacent Rivals Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers Timely Quality Problem Resolution in Peer-Production Systems: The Impact of Bots, Policy Citations, and Contributor Experience Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement How to Make My Bug Bounty Cost-Effective? A Game-Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1