An Alternative Understanding of Social Entrepreneurs in Terms of Resonance and Vulnerability: Based on Hartmut Rosa’s Philosophy and Sociology

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s40926-024-00247-w
Rim Hachana, Patrick Gilormini
{"title":"An Alternative Understanding of Social Entrepreneurs in Terms of Resonance and Vulnerability: Based on Hartmut Rosa’s Philosophy and Sociology","authors":"Rim Hachana, Patrick Gilormini","doi":"10.1007/s40926-024-00247-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In their pursuit of addressing social and environmental challenges, social entrepreneurs should be social transformers emancipating stakeholders. Rosa’s critical theorizing in philosophy and sociology points the ways to expanding the conventional conception of social entrepreneurship to include long-term social transformation. Modifying Rosa, social entrepreneurship is not anti-capitalist but reforms capitalism. The key relevant concepts in Rosa are resonance, alienation, ambivalence, vulnerability, dynamic stabilization through the triple A of appropriation, acceleration, and activation, and emancipatory interest. We consider social entrepreneurs as resonant actors, they satisfy threefold resonance preconditions: cognitive, material, and social. As a matter of fact, they are rejecting alienation through their effort to provide others with a high(er) social value. Rosa’s theoretical framework is a new and inspiring phenomenological and critical lens that is worth studying in relationship to a social entrepreneurship point of view because social entrepreneurs are facing huge challenges and multiple paradoxes that Rosa’s thinking enables their better understanding. An essential precondition of the resonance of social entrepreneurs is their vulnerability, which is strengthened by the escalatory logic of acceleration of the world fostering ambivalence. Entering in resonance with the world is a cause and a consequence of vulnerability. Only a vulnerable social entrepreneur can experience resonant actions as a prerequisite to reach the “good life”. Our findings underline the necessity to reconcile Rosa’s theoretical analysis with the effectual logic of social entrepreneurship in which it is necessary for social entrepreneurs to resonate with all stakeholders to gain legitimacy and be able to identify the sources of their true “emancipatory interest” in long-term social transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54136,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-024-00247-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their pursuit of addressing social and environmental challenges, social entrepreneurs should be social transformers emancipating stakeholders. Rosa’s critical theorizing in philosophy and sociology points the ways to expanding the conventional conception of social entrepreneurship to include long-term social transformation. Modifying Rosa, social entrepreneurship is not anti-capitalist but reforms capitalism. The key relevant concepts in Rosa are resonance, alienation, ambivalence, vulnerability, dynamic stabilization through the triple A of appropriation, acceleration, and activation, and emancipatory interest. We consider social entrepreneurs as resonant actors, they satisfy threefold resonance preconditions: cognitive, material, and social. As a matter of fact, they are rejecting alienation through their effort to provide others with a high(er) social value. Rosa’s theoretical framework is a new and inspiring phenomenological and critical lens that is worth studying in relationship to a social entrepreneurship point of view because social entrepreneurs are facing huge challenges and multiple paradoxes that Rosa’s thinking enables their better understanding. An essential precondition of the resonance of social entrepreneurs is their vulnerability, which is strengthened by the escalatory logic of acceleration of the world fostering ambivalence. Entering in resonance with the world is a cause and a consequence of vulnerability. Only a vulnerable social entrepreneur can experience resonant actions as a prerequisite to reach the “good life”. Our findings underline the necessity to reconcile Rosa’s theoretical analysis with the effectual logic of social entrepreneurship in which it is necessary for social entrepreneurs to resonate with all stakeholders to gain legitimacy and be able to identify the sources of their true “emancipatory interest” in long-term social transformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从共振和脆弱性的角度另解社会企业家:以哈特穆特-罗萨的哲学和社会学为基础
在应对社会和环境挑战的过程中,社会企业家应成为解放利益相关者的社会改造者。罗莎在哲学和社会学方面的批判性理论为扩大社会企业家精神的传统概念以包括长期社会变革指明了方向。根据罗莎的修改,社会企业家精神不是反资本主义,而是改革资本主义。罗莎的主要相关概念是共振、异化、矛盾、脆弱性、通过占有、加速和激活的三A动态稳定以及解放利益。我们将社会企业家视为共振行动者,他们满足三重共振前提条件:认知、物质和社会。事实上,他们通过努力为他人提供较高的社会价值来拒绝异化。罗莎的理论框架是一个全新的、具有启发性的现象学和批判性视角,值得从社会创业的角度加以研究,因为社会创业者正面临着巨大的挑战和多重悖论,而罗莎的思想能让他们更好地理解这些挑战和悖论。社会企业家产生共鸣的一个基本前提是他们的脆弱性,而世界加速发展的逻辑又加剧了他们的矛盾心理。与世界共振是脆弱的原因,也是脆弱的结果。只有脆弱的社会企业家才能体验到共鸣行动是实现 "美好生活 "的先决条件。我们的研究结果凸显了将罗莎的理论分析与社会企业家精神的有效逻辑相协调的必要 性,在这种逻辑中,社会企业家必须与所有利益相关者产生共鸣,以获得合法性,并能确 定他们在长期社会变革中真正的 "解放利益 "的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Philosophy of Management addresses all aspects of the philosophical foundations of management in theory and practice, including business ethics, ontology, epistemology, aesthetics and politics.  The application of philosophical disciplines to issues facing managers are increasingly recognized to include organizational purpose, performance measurement, the status of ethics, employee privacy, and limitations on the right to manage. Philosophy of Management is an independent, refereed forum that focuses on these central philosophical issues of management in theory and practice. The journal is open to contributions from all philosophical schools and traditions.  Since 2001 the journal has published three issues per year, each focused on a particular topic. Published contributors include René ten Bos, Ghislain Deslandes, Juan Fontrodona, Michelle Greenwood, Jeremy Moon, Geoff Moore, Duncan Pritchard, and Duane Windsor. This journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure.
期刊最新文献
How do you find the Crack? A Report on a ‘Philosophical Methods’ Workshop Freedom in Business: Elizabeth Anderson, Adam Smith, and the Effects of Dominance in Business Organizational Resilience through the Philosophical Lens of Aristotelian and Heraclitean Philosophy Technological Evolution and Cooperative Identity: A Genealogical Analysis using Simondon's Cybernetic Process Philosophy “You Can’t Say That”: A Normative Account of Speech Rights and Limits in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1