An evaluation of the impact of mitigation policies on health and the economy by managing social distancing during outbreaks

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102406
Antonio Lopolito , Rocco Caferra , Andrea Nigri , Piergiuseppe Morone
{"title":"An evaluation of the impact of mitigation policies on health and the economy by managing social distancing during outbreaks","authors":"Antonio Lopolito ,&nbsp;Rocco Caferra ,&nbsp;Andrea Nigri ,&nbsp;Piergiuseppe Morone","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated various unavoidable social restrictions, leading to questions about the effectiveness of public emergency interventions and their impact economic growth. Block et al. (2020) conducted a notably study using an agent-based model to evaluate policies for reducing contact and demonstrated how choices in contact behavior can influence the rate and spread of the virus. However, their approach did not consider the economic consequences of these social restrictions. In response, we propose a set of strategies for governments to plan and evaluate policies during emergencies, aiming to contain infections while minimizing negative economic consequences. Our results indicate that there is no trade-off between containment strategies and economic output loss, making containment measures necessary policy instruments. However, potential trade-offs do emerge when selecting the most effective strategy. In this context, we propose and evaluate various policy alternatives to extreme \"social distancing\" measures, which can partially restore essential social interactions while preventing economic disasters induced by productivity losses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated various unavoidable social restrictions, leading to questions about the effectiveness of public emergency interventions and their impact economic growth. Block et al. (2020) conducted a notably study using an agent-based model to evaluate policies for reducing contact and demonstrated how choices in contact behavior can influence the rate and spread of the virus. However, their approach did not consider the economic consequences of these social restrictions. In response, we propose a set of strategies for governments to plan and evaluate policies during emergencies, aiming to contain infections while minimizing negative economic consequences. Our results indicate that there is no trade-off between containment strategies and economic output loss, making containment measures necessary policy instruments. However, potential trade-offs do emerge when selecting the most effective strategy. In this context, we propose and evaluate various policy alternatives to extreme "social distancing" measures, which can partially restore essential social interactions while preventing economic disasters induced by productivity losses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过管理疫情爆发期间的社会距离,评估缓解政策对健康和经济的影响
COVID-19 大流行导致了各种不可避免的社会限制,从而引发了关于公共应急干预措施的有效性及其对经济增长的影响的问题。Block 等人(2020 年)进行了一项引人注目的研究,使用基于代理的模型来评估减少接触的政策,并证明了接触行为的选择如何影响病毒的传播速度和传播范围。作为回应,我们为政府在紧急情况下规划和评估政策提出了一套策略,旨在控制感染的同时尽量减少负面经济后果。我们的研究结果表明,遏制策略与经济产出损失之间不存在权衡,因此遏制措施是必要的政策工具。在这种情况下,我们提出并评估了极端 "社会疏远 "措施的各种政策替代方案,这些方案既能部分恢复基本的社会互动,又能防止因生产力损失而引发经济灾难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Overview of rural credit environment in China: Measurement logic, evaluation system, and case analysis Using social research and development methods in artist-mediated workshops with Myanmar refugee women to design a culturally responsive community resettlement center Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review Analyzing the impact of the new educational policy 2020: A comprehensive review of India's educational reforms A deep dive into the factors affecting household solar photovoltaic adoption: An extended perspective of the value-based adoption model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1