A shared lens around sensemaking in learning analytics: What activity theory, definition of a situation and affordances can offer

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1111/bjet.13435
Oleksandra Poquet
{"title":"A shared lens around sensemaking in learning analytics: What activity theory, definition of a situation and affordances can offer","authors":"Oleksandra Poquet","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper argues that learning analytics as a research field can benefit from a theory-informed shared language to describe sensemaking of learning and teaching data. To make the case for such shared language, first, I critically review prominent sensemaking theories to then demonstrate how studies in learning analytics do not use coherent descriptions of sensemaking, eclectically combining the paradigms that have underlying differences. I then propose a conceptualization of sensemaking that overcomes the differences between these theories and explains how the concepts of <i>activity system</i>, the <i>definition of the situation</i> and <i>affordances</i> can be used to capture individual differences in sensemaking. The paper concludes with a preliminary framework and examples demonstrating its utility in raising new theoretical questions, informing design principles and providing shared language for researchers in learning analytics.\n </p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"55 4","pages":"1811-1831"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper argues that learning analytics as a research field can benefit from a theory-informed shared language to describe sensemaking of learning and teaching data. To make the case for such shared language, first, I critically review prominent sensemaking theories to then demonstrate how studies in learning analytics do not use coherent descriptions of sensemaking, eclectically combining the paradigms that have underlying differences. I then propose a conceptualization of sensemaking that overcomes the differences between these theories and explains how the concepts of activity system, the definition of the situation and affordances can be used to capture individual differences in sensemaking. The paper concludes with a preliminary framework and examples demonstrating its utility in raising new theoretical questions, informing design principles and providing shared language for researchers in learning analytics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围绕学习分析中的感性认识的共同视角:活动理论、情境定义和承受能力能提供什么
本文认为,学习分析作为一个研究领域,可以受益于以理论为依据的共同语言,来描述学习和教学数据的感知生成。为了证明这种共同语言的合理性,首先,我对著名的 "感性制造 "理论进行了批判性回顾,然后证明了学习分析研究如何没有使用连贯的 "感性制造 "描述,而是折衷性地结合了具有潜在差异的范式。然后,我提出了一种感官建立的概念化方法,克服了这些理论之间的差异,并解释了如何利用活动系统、情境定义和承受能力等概念来捕捉感官建立中的个体差异。本文最后提出了一个初步框架并列举了一些实例,以证明该框架在提出新的理论问题、指导设计原则以及为学习分析研究人员提供共同语言方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A multimodal approach to support teacher, researcher and AI collaboration in STEM+C learning environments Exploring Twitter as a social learning space for education scholars: An analysis of value‐added contributions to the #TPACK network Youths' relationship with culture: Tracing sixth graders' learning through designing culturally centred multimedia projects Seeking to support preservice teachers' responsive teaching: Leveraging artificial intelligence‐supported virtual simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1