Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Research in Transportation Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101404
Sebastian Schmidt, Adriana Saraceni
{"title":"Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery","authors":"Sebastian Schmidt,&nbsp;Adriana Saraceni","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drones are expected to allow faster and more efficient last mile parcel delivery while at the same time reducing relevant costs. This studies’ purpose is to understand what factors influence consumer acceptance in Germany. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model was expand using an incremental approach. The construct performance expectancy was replaced with the three context-specific constructs, environmental performance expectancy, speed expectancy, and relative advantage of contact-free delivery. Four perceived risk constructs (i.e., privacy risk, safety risk, noise risk, financial risk) were added. Eleven hypotheses were developed and tested via an online survey. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Relative advantage of contact-free delivery, hedonic motivation, and social influence are the highlights among the factors investigated for their influence on consumer acceptance. The influence on the perceived risk constructs privacy risk and safety risk varies depending on drone usage experience and gender. The value of the study stems from the proposed extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, tailored to a new technology context (drones for last mile parcel delivery) and a different cultural setting (Germany). This research contributes to the multidisciplinary approach of existing drone research by adding a consumer perspective to the mainly logistics provider-oriented engineering, informatics, and operations research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 101404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923001440/pdfft?md5=d0fe4f35e9f8ee732771ae9f9340d5b0&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885923001440-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923001440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drones are expected to allow faster and more efficient last mile parcel delivery while at the same time reducing relevant costs. This studies’ purpose is to understand what factors influence consumer acceptance in Germany. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model was expand using an incremental approach. The construct performance expectancy was replaced with the three context-specific constructs, environmental performance expectancy, speed expectancy, and relative advantage of contact-free delivery. Four perceived risk constructs (i.e., privacy risk, safety risk, noise risk, financial risk) were added. Eleven hypotheses were developed and tested via an online survey. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Relative advantage of contact-free delivery, hedonic motivation, and social influence are the highlights among the factors investigated for their influence on consumer acceptance. The influence on the perceived risk constructs privacy risk and safety risk varies depending on drone usage experience and gender. The value of the study stems from the proposed extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, tailored to a new technology context (drones for last mile parcel delivery) and a different cultural setting (Germany). This research contributes to the multidisciplinary approach of existing drone research by adding a consumer perspective to the mainly logistics provider-oriented engineering, informatics, and operations research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者接受基于无人机的最后一英里送货技术
无人机有望实现更快、更高效的最后一英里包裹递送,同时降低相关成本。本研究旨在了解影响德国消费者接受程度的因素。研究采用渐进的方法对 "接受和使用技术统一理论 "模型进行了扩展。性能预期构念被三个特定情境构念取代,即环境性能预期、速度预期和免接触交付的相对优势。还增加了四个感知风险结构(即隐私风险、安全风险、噪音风险和财务风险)。通过在线调查提出并测试了 11 项假设。使用社会科学统计软件包中的结构方程模型对数据进行了分析。非接触式交付的相对优势、享乐动机和社会影响是调查影响消费者接受度的因素中的亮点。隐私风险和安全风险对感知风险的影响因无人机使用经验和性别而异。这项研究的价值来自于所提出的 "技术接受与使用统一理论 "扩展模型,该模型是针对新技术环境(无人机用于最后一英里包裹递送)和不同文化背景(德国)量身定制的。这项研究为现有无人机研究的多学科方法做出了贡献,在主要面向物流供应商的工程学、信息学和运营研究中加入了消费者视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
期刊最新文献
eXplainable DEA approach for evaluating performance of public transport origin-destination pairs Increased ridership and improved affordability: Transforming public transport subsidies in developing contexts Spatial participatory planning for urban logistics: A GIS-enhanced Real-Time Spatial Delphi approach A framework for analyzing service disruptions in last-mile and first-mile reverse logistics Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1