Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa
{"title":"Performance of GPT-4V(ision) in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions","authors":"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Masahiro Miyake, Koji Kitazawa","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.\nMethods: The questions were collected from the \"Diagnosis This\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.\nResults: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].\nConclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.26.24301802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.
Methods: The questions were collected from the "Diagnosis This" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.
Results: The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].
Conclusions: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.