Measuring Afrocentrism: A Review of Existing Instruments

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Social Work Research Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1093/swr/svad023
Husain Lateef, Adrian Gale, Meredith Parker, Melody Konadu Frempong
{"title":"Measuring Afrocentrism: A Review of Existing Instruments","authors":"Husain Lateef, Adrian Gale, Meredith Parker, Melody Konadu Frempong","doi":"10.1093/swr/svad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of Afrocentrism and investigation of Afrocentricity’s significance in the lives of Black Americans has gained momentum, given the current evidence suggesting that cultural factors matter in the lives of diverse populations. In particular, factors associated with African philosophical constructs may have significant relationships with improved mental health and overall well-being among African and African diaspora populations. However, the prior conceptual literature suggests that Afrocentrism is a heterogenous concept with a multitude of domains associated with its measurement. The present study was envisioned given the relative absence of studies evaluating the availability and psychometric properties of Afrocentric measures within social work. Utilizing systematic analysis methodology and PRISMA guidelines, a search for Afrocentric measures was undertaken using four key databases. Spanning the literature between 1980 and 2021, this review identified a total of seven instruments that fully met the study’s inclusion-specific criteria. In accordance with the call for continued research and practice emphasizing resilience and protective factors within the lives of Black populations, the present study provides accessible knowledge to researchers and practitioners on the currently available instruments to evaluate Afrocentrism in the lives of populations of African descent.","PeriodicalId":47282,"journal":{"name":"Social Work Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svad023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of Afrocentrism and investigation of Afrocentricity’s significance in the lives of Black Americans has gained momentum, given the current evidence suggesting that cultural factors matter in the lives of diverse populations. In particular, factors associated with African philosophical constructs may have significant relationships with improved mental health and overall well-being among African and African diaspora populations. However, the prior conceptual literature suggests that Afrocentrism is a heterogenous concept with a multitude of domains associated with its measurement. The present study was envisioned given the relative absence of studies evaluating the availability and psychometric properties of Afrocentric measures within social work. Utilizing systematic analysis methodology and PRISMA guidelines, a search for Afrocentric measures was undertaken using four key databases. Spanning the literature between 1980 and 2021, this review identified a total of seven instruments that fully met the study’s inclusion-specific criteria. In accordance with the call for continued research and practice emphasizing resilience and protective factors within the lives of Black populations, the present study provides accessible knowledge to researchers and practitioners on the currently available instruments to evaluate Afrocentrism in the lives of populations of African descent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量非洲中心主义:现有工具评述
鉴于目前有证据表明文化因素对不同人群的生活至关重要,对非洲中心主义的测量和对非洲中心主义在美国黑人生活中的意义的调查已经获得了动力。特别是,与非洲哲学建构相关的因素可能与改善非洲人和非洲散居人口的心理健康和整体福祉有着重要的关系。然而,先前的概念性文献表明,非洲中心主义是一个异质概念,与其测量相关的领域众多。由于相对缺乏对社会工作中非洲中心主义测量方法的可用性和心理测量特性进行评估的研究,本研究应运而生。利用系统分析方法和 PRISMA 准则,我们在四个主要数据库中搜索了以非洲为中心的测量方法。在 1980 年至 2021 年期间的文献中,该研究共发现了七种完全符合研究特定纳入标准的工具。为了响应持续研究和实践的号召,强调黑人生活中的复原力和保护因素,本研究为研究人员和从业人员提供了关于目前可用的评估非洲裔生活中的非洲中心主义的工具的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work Research
Social Work Research SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Social work research addresses psychosocial problems, preventive interventions, treatment of acute and chronic conditions, and community, organizational, policy and administrative issues. Covering the lifespan, social work research may address clinical, services and policy issues. It benefits consumers, practitioners, policy-makers, educators, and the general public by: •Examining prevention and intervention strategies for health and mental health, child welfare, aging, substance abuse, community development, managed care, housing, economic self-sufficiency, family well-being, etc.; Studying the strengths, needs, and inter-relationships of individuals, families, groups, neighborhoods, and social institutions;
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of South Asian Youth in the United States about Gender Norms and Healthcare Decision Making LGBTQ+ People’s Perceptions of Interactions with Outgroup Members: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice “The Air Is Being Sucked Out of the Room”: Experiences of Social Work Students of Color with Antiracism Education in the Classroom and Practicum Environmental Sensitivity Scale for Social Workers: A Scale Development Study A Qualitative Exploration of Social Workers’ Job Preparedness in Law Enforcement Agencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1