People’s Contrasting Attitudes Towards Universal Basic Income in Sweden and South Korea

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Policy and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1017/s1474746423000507
Jae-jin Yang, Yonhyok Choe, Yunmin Nam
{"title":"People’s Contrasting Attitudes Towards Universal Basic Income in Sweden and South Korea","authors":"Jae-jin Yang, Yonhyok Choe, Yunmin Nam","doi":"10.1017/s1474746423000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The discourse on universal basic income varies widely across countries. In Sweden, public opinion is generally negative even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it is barely discussed on the public policy table. On the other hand, in South Korea, public opinion is not as negative as in Sweden, and basic income is actively raised as policy agenda. Our study based on survey results reaffirmed the contrasting attitudes of the Swedish and Suth Korean people regarding basic income and related tax increase. The basic income could appeal to the people in South Korea. On the contrary, there is little room for the introduction of basic income in Sweden. The analysis also revealed similarities within the difference. Those with high income, political-right orientation, high protection against income loss, and high tax burden would be more unfavourable toward introduction of basic income no matter which country they live in.</p>","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746423000507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discourse on universal basic income varies widely across countries. In Sweden, public opinion is generally negative even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it is barely discussed on the public policy table. On the other hand, in South Korea, public opinion is not as negative as in Sweden, and basic income is actively raised as policy agenda. Our study based on survey results reaffirmed the contrasting attitudes of the Swedish and Suth Korean people regarding basic income and related tax increase. The basic income could appeal to the people in South Korea. On the contrary, there is little room for the introduction of basic income in Sweden. The analysis also revealed similarities within the difference. Those with high income, political-right orientation, high protection against income loss, and high tax burden would be more unfavourable toward introduction of basic income no matter which country they live in.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典和韩国民众对全民基本收入的截然不同的态度
关于全民基本收入的讨论在各国大相径庭。在瑞典,即使在 Covid-19 大流行的背景下,公众舆论也普遍持否定态度,在公共政策会议上几乎没有讨论过这个问题。另一方面,在韩国,公众舆论并不像瑞典那样消极,基本收入作为政策议程被积极提出。我们基于调查结果的研究再次证实了瑞典和韩国人民对基本收入和相关增税问题的截然相反的态度。基本收入可以吸引韩国人民。相反,在瑞典引入基本收入的空间很小。分析还揭示了差异中的相似性。那些收入高、政治倾向右翼、收入损失保护意识强、税收负担重的人,无论生活在哪个国家,都更不赞成引入基本收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
The ‘Perfect Storm’: Food Banks and Food Insecurity During the Covid-19 Pandemic Five Factors for Effective Policy to Improve Attitudes towards People with Disability Homelessness Transitions, Risks, and Prevention Across the Life Course Silent Elements of Policy Change: Inflation and Uprating Mechanisms in the Low Countries Exclusionary Mechanisms of Social Policy Redistribution in Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1