Investigating the effect of three different factors including experience, personality and color on the decision-making process in stock markets using EEG

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102163
Pegah AsleBagh , Ali Bonyadi Naeini , MohammadReza Moeeni
{"title":"Investigating the effect of three different factors including experience, personality and color on the decision-making process in stock markets using EEG","authors":"Pegah AsleBagh ,&nbsp;Ali Bonyadi Naeini ,&nbsp;MohammadReza Moeeni","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stock markets and exchanges are crucial economic pillars in every country. Decision-making in the stock market poses significant challenges and fundamental problems for investors in this field. According to studies conducted in the field of psychology, it has been found that investors' personal experiences and personality characteristics are among the factors that influence their decision-making.</p><p>This research aims to examine the impact of three factors, namely personal experience, personality, and color, on the decision-making process of investors in stock markets, with a focus on the perspective of neuroscience. The data analysis method employed in this study involved analyzing the brain signals of investors using electroencephalography (EEG). This test was conducted individually for each participant within a simulated environment resembling the Iran stock market.</p><p>Finally, the analysis of the results revealed that the level of investors' experience significantly impacts their performance and decision-making. Additionally, in certain cases, the brain function of these individuals exhibits contrasting patterns. When examining the performance of two personality types, namely extroverted and introverted, during transactions, the findings indicated that their decision-making approaches differ across various situations. Extroverted participants exhibited a greater emotional response at various intervals compared to introverted participants. Furthermore, the analysis of the results indicated that altering the color of the numbers in the simulated trading environment influenced the emotions and reactions of investors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400003X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stock markets and exchanges are crucial economic pillars in every country. Decision-making in the stock market poses significant challenges and fundamental problems for investors in this field. According to studies conducted in the field of psychology, it has been found that investors' personal experiences and personality characteristics are among the factors that influence their decision-making.

This research aims to examine the impact of three factors, namely personal experience, personality, and color, on the decision-making process of investors in stock markets, with a focus on the perspective of neuroscience. The data analysis method employed in this study involved analyzing the brain signals of investors using electroencephalography (EEG). This test was conducted individually for each participant within a simulated environment resembling the Iran stock market.

Finally, the analysis of the results revealed that the level of investors' experience significantly impacts their performance and decision-making. Additionally, in certain cases, the brain function of these individuals exhibits contrasting patterns. When examining the performance of two personality types, namely extroverted and introverted, during transactions, the findings indicated that their decision-making approaches differ across various situations. Extroverted participants exhibited a greater emotional response at various intervals compared to introverted participants. Furthermore, the analysis of the results indicated that altering the color of the numbers in the simulated trading environment influenced the emotions and reactions of investors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用脑电图研究经验、性格和肤色等三种不同因素对股市决策过程的影响
股票市场和交易所是每个国家的重要经济支柱。股票市场上的决策给这一领域的投资者带来了重大挑战和根本问题。根据心理学领域的研究发现,投资者的个人经历和个性特征是影响其决策的因素之一。本研究旨在从神经科学的角度出发,重点考察个人经历、个性和肤色这三个因素对股票市场投资者决策过程的影响。本研究采用的数据分析方法是利用脑电图(EEG)分析投资者的大脑信号。最后,对结果的分析表明,投资者的经验水平对他们的表现和决策有重大影响。此外,在某些情况下,这些人的大脑功能表现出截然不同的模式。在研究两种性格类型(即外向型和内向型)的人在交易过程中的表现时,研究结果表明,他们在不同情况下的决策方法是不同的。与内向型参与者相比,外向型参与者在不同时间段表现出更大的情绪反应。此外,结果分析表明,改变模拟交易环境中数字的颜色会影响投资者的情绪和反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
期刊最新文献
Privacy during pandemics: Attitudes to public use of personal data Understanding inconsistencies in risk attitude elicitation games: Evidence from smallholder farmers in five African countries Inflation expectations in the wake of the war in Ukraine Asking for a friend: Reminders and incentives for crowdfunding college savings ‘Update Bias’: Manipulating past information based on the existing circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1