Evaluation of the cyber security models implemented across common attack vectors: A review of literature

Afra Ansaria
{"title":"Evaluation of the cyber security models implemented across common attack vectors: A review of literature","authors":"Afra Ansaria","doi":"10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity is an organizational issue that should be looked at through the lens of various stakeholders. However, it is often treated as a siloed issue in which more is always seen as better. The CISOs, CIOs, and the key decision-makers struggle to understand how much security is enough. Cybersecurity solutions, referred to as controls, more often than not result in a residual risk. To assess this risk better, the security controls should be studied in further detail. The objective of this paper is to educate the audience with the various cyber security controls being used in the academia and in the industry. In order to circumvent the security issues faced by large organization, the tradeoffs of each controls should be studied further. The paper is meant to provide a balanced view providing the positive and the critical aspect of implementing some of the known security solutions. There is no one perfect formula when it comes to selecting security controls. However, picking a security control that are in line with the users’ needs will help reduce some of the risks associated with implementing the controls. An optimal solution requires a balanced approach towards the risk, cost, and benefit of the solution. The aim of the paper is to help the reader assess some of risks and the tradeoff associated with the security controls being practiced in the industry today.","PeriodicalId":275182,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cybersecurity is an organizational issue that should be looked at through the lens of various stakeholders. However, it is often treated as a siloed issue in which more is always seen as better. The CISOs, CIOs, and the key decision-makers struggle to understand how much security is enough. Cybersecurity solutions, referred to as controls, more often than not result in a residual risk. To assess this risk better, the security controls should be studied in further detail. The objective of this paper is to educate the audience with the various cyber security controls being used in the academia and in the industry. In order to circumvent the security issues faced by large organization, the tradeoffs of each controls should be studied further. The paper is meant to provide a balanced view providing the positive and the critical aspect of implementing some of the known security solutions. There is no one perfect formula when it comes to selecting security controls. However, picking a security control that are in line with the users’ needs will help reduce some of the risks associated with implementing the controls. An optimal solution requires a balanced approach towards the risk, cost, and benefit of the solution. The aim of the paper is to help the reader assess some of risks and the tradeoff associated with the security controls being practiced in the industry today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估针对常见攻击载体实施的网络安全模型:文献综述
网络安全是一个组织问题,应从各利益相关方的角度加以审视。然而,网络安全往往被视为一个孤立的问题,总是越多越好。首席信息安全官(CISO)、首席信息安全官(CIO)和主要决策者都很难理解多少安全才是足够的。被称为控制措施的网络安全解决方案往往会带来残余风险。为了更好地评估这种风险,应进一步详细研究安全控制措施。本文旨在向读者介绍学术界和业界使用的各种网络安全控制措施。为了规避大型组织面临的安全问题,应进一步研究每种控制措施的利弊得失。本文旨在提供一个平衡的视角,提供实施一些已知安全解决方案的积极和关键方面。在选择安全控制时,没有一个完美的公式。不过,选择符合用户需求的安全控制措施,将有助于降低与实施控制措施相关的一些风险。最佳解决方案需要在风险、成本和效益之间取得平衡。本文旨在帮助读者评估一些风险以及与当前行业中实施的安全控制相关的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The study of an innovative Eéducationnel practice in Greek students: The flipped learning Optimization of solar energy using recurrent neural network controller with dc-dc boost, Cuk, and single-ended primary inductor converter (SEPIC) Converters Fungal species associated with the surface of selected green leafy vegetables from Bwari market, Abuja - Nigeria: implications on consumer health Comprehensive analysis of gold and silver trading patterns and future projections Policy approaches for bioenergy development in response to climate change: A conceptual analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1