Adoption of irrigation scheduling in the South African sugarcane industry: the use of a demonstration trial to bring about change

Sugar Industry Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.36961/si30896
Marius W. Adendorff, A. Jumman, Aresti Paraskevopoulos
{"title":"Adoption of irrigation scheduling in the South African sugarcane industry: the use of a demonstration trial to bring about change","authors":"Marius W. Adendorff, A. Jumman, Aresti Paraskevopoulos","doi":"10.36961/si30896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the South African sugarcane industry, as in many countries, poor adoption of irrigation scheduling is common, leading to ineffective use of irrigation water and loss in yield and income. The reasons for the lack of adoption include economic constraints, difficulty with implementation and human perceptions. To demonstrate the benefits of effective irrigation scheduling under local conditions, a demonstration trial was conducted over 5 years at Pongola, South Africa. Here, a fixed irrigation schedule (control) was compared with three scheduling treatments: (1) the MyCanesim® computer model with data from an automatic weather station; (2) soil-water data from a capacitance probe; and (3) a combination treatment, where MyCanesim® was integrated with a capacitance probe. The number of stress days from either under- or over-irrigation, along with the RV (recoverable value) yield, irrigation applied, irrigation water productivity (IWP) and financial benefits was used to assess each treatment. The adoption of irrigation scheduling was also evaluated through farmer surveys before and after the trial. When compared to the fixed-cycle control, the use of irrigation-scheduling techniques resulted in an increase of up to 13% in RV yield, a reduction of up to 58% in irrigation water applied, improved IWP of up to 23.9 t cane/100 mm of irrigation and financial benefits of up to ZAR10,487/(ha · a) (USD698/(ha · a)). The combination treatment incurred the least water-stress days, 79% lower than the control. Farmer surveys showed an increase of 45% in the adoption of irrigation scheduling, from 11% (n = 111) in 2014 to 56% (n = 100) in 2020. Although site-specific, the trial results show substantial benefits that can be realised by scheduling irrigation. The trial results compare well to other similar studies, showing that the results can be used in other areas to promote the adoption of irrigation scheduling.","PeriodicalId":508525,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Industry","volume":"4 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36961/si30896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the South African sugarcane industry, as in many countries, poor adoption of irrigation scheduling is common, leading to ineffective use of irrigation water and loss in yield and income. The reasons for the lack of adoption include economic constraints, difficulty with implementation and human perceptions. To demonstrate the benefits of effective irrigation scheduling under local conditions, a demonstration trial was conducted over 5 years at Pongola, South Africa. Here, a fixed irrigation schedule (control) was compared with three scheduling treatments: (1) the MyCanesim® computer model with data from an automatic weather station; (2) soil-water data from a capacitance probe; and (3) a combination treatment, where MyCanesim® was integrated with a capacitance probe. The number of stress days from either under- or over-irrigation, along with the RV (recoverable value) yield, irrigation applied, irrigation water productivity (IWP) and financial benefits was used to assess each treatment. The adoption of irrigation scheduling was also evaluated through farmer surveys before and after the trial. When compared to the fixed-cycle control, the use of irrigation-scheduling techniques resulted in an increase of up to 13% in RV yield, a reduction of up to 58% in irrigation water applied, improved IWP of up to 23.9 t cane/100 mm of irrigation and financial benefits of up to ZAR10,487/(ha · a) (USD698/(ha · a)). The combination treatment incurred the least water-stress days, 79% lower than the control. Farmer surveys showed an increase of 45% in the adoption of irrigation scheduling, from 11% (n = 111) in 2014 to 56% (n = 100) in 2020. Although site-specific, the trial results show substantial benefits that can be realised by scheduling irrigation. The trial results compare well to other similar studies, showing that the results can be used in other areas to promote the adoption of irrigation scheduling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非甘蔗产业采用灌溉计划:利用示范试验实现变革
与许多国家一样,南非的甘蔗产业也普遍存在灌溉计划采用率低的问题,导致灌溉水利用效率低下,造成产量和收入损失。不采用的原因包括经济限制、实施困难和人的观念。为了证明在当地条件下有效灌溉计划的益处,在南非邦戈拉进行了为期 5 年的示范试验。在这里,固定灌溉计划(对照)与三种调度处理进行了比较:(1) MyCanesim® 计算机模型与自动气象站数据;(2) 电容探头提供的土壤水数据;(3) MyCanesim® 与电容探头相结合的综合处理。在评估每种处理时,都采用了灌溉不足或灌溉过度造成的胁迫天数、RV(可收回值)产量、灌溉量、灌溉水生产率(IWP)和经济效益。此外,还通过试验前后的农民调查对灌溉调度的采用情况进行了评估。与固定周期对照相比,采用灌溉调度技术可使 RV 产量提高 13%,灌溉用水量减少 58%,灌溉水生产率提高 23.9 吨甘蔗/100 毫米,经济效益高达 10,487 南非兰特/(公顷-a)(698 美元/(公顷-a))。综合处理的缺水天数最少,比对照低 79%。农民调查显示,灌溉计划的采用率提高了 45%,从 2014 年的 11%(n = 111)提高到 2020 年的 56%(n = 100)。尽管试验结果因地而异,但它显示了通过调度灌溉可实现的巨大效益。试验结果与其他类似研究结果相比也有很好的可比性,表明这些结果可用于其他地区,以促进灌溉调度的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of exopolysaccharides on the purification process – filtration, sedimentation and particle size distribution Transgenic sugarcane for the sustainable management of the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis Adoption of irrigation scheduling in the South African sugarcane industry: the use of a demonstration trial to bring about change Using spectral sensing in plant science On-line monitoring of C seed magma using the ITECA Crystobserver to improve performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1