Philanthropy as whiteness: toward racially just philanthropic practices

Charity P. Scott, Nicole Rodriguez Leach
{"title":"Philanthropy as whiteness: toward racially just philanthropic practices","authors":"Charity P. Scott, Nicole Rodriguez Leach","doi":"10.1108/edi-06-2023-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeExploring how racism continues to persist throughout public and nonprofit organizations is central to undoing persistent society-wide injustices in the United States and around the globe. The authors provide two cases for identifying and understanding the ways in which philanthropy’s whiteness does harm to K–12 students and communities of color.Design/methodology/approachIn this article, the authors draw on critical race theory and critical whiteness studies, specifically Cheryl Harris' work to expose the whiteness of philanthropy, not as a racial identity, but in the way that philanthropy is performed. The authors characterize one of the property functions of whiteness, the right to exclude, as working through two mechanisms: neoliberal exclusion and overt exclusion. Drawing on this construction of the right to exclude, the authors present two cases: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the City Fund.FindingsWhether intentional or not, the Gates Foundation and the City Fund each exclude communities of color in several ways: from changes to schools and districts, parents' experiences navigating school enrollment due to these changes, to academic assessments and political lobbying.Originality/valueThese cases provide a way for researchers and practitioners to see how organizations in real time reify the extant racial hierarchy so as to disrupt such organizational processes and practices for racial justice.","PeriodicalId":503114,"journal":{"name":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","volume":"27 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-06-2023-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeExploring how racism continues to persist throughout public and nonprofit organizations is central to undoing persistent society-wide injustices in the United States and around the globe. The authors provide two cases for identifying and understanding the ways in which philanthropy’s whiteness does harm to K–12 students and communities of color.Design/methodology/approachIn this article, the authors draw on critical race theory and critical whiteness studies, specifically Cheryl Harris' work to expose the whiteness of philanthropy, not as a racial identity, but in the way that philanthropy is performed. The authors characterize one of the property functions of whiteness, the right to exclude, as working through two mechanisms: neoliberal exclusion and overt exclusion. Drawing on this construction of the right to exclude, the authors present two cases: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the City Fund.FindingsWhether intentional or not, the Gates Foundation and the City Fund each exclude communities of color in several ways: from changes to schools and districts, parents' experiences navigating school enrollment due to these changes, to academic assessments and political lobbying.Originality/valueThese cases provide a way for researchers and practitioners to see how organizations in real time reify the extant racial hierarchy so as to disrupt such organizational processes and practices for racial justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为白人的慈善事业:实现种族公正的慈善实践
目的探讨种族主义是如何在公共和非营利组织中持续存在的,这对消除美国和全世 界持续存在的全社会不公正现象至关重要。作者提供了两个案例,用于识别和理解慈善事业的白人性对 K-12 学生和有色人种社区造成伤害的方式。在本文中,作者借鉴了批判性种族理论和批判性白人性研究,特别是谢丽尔-哈里斯(Cheryl Harris)的研究成果,揭露慈善事业的白人性,不是作为一种种族身份,而是慈善事业的运作方式。作者将白人特性的财产功能之一--排斥权--描述为通过两种机制发挥作用:新自由主义排斥和公开排斥。研究结果无论有意还是无意,盖茨基金会和城市基金都以多种方式排斥有色人种社区:从学校和学区的变化、家长因这些变化而导致的入学经历,到学术评估和政治游说。原创性/价值这些案例为研究人员和从业人员提供了一种途径,让他们了解组织如何实时重构现存的种族等级制度,从而破坏这些组织程序和实践,以实现种族正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The only daughters effect: examining the relationship between child gender and a CEO’s hiring decisions “They kill us mentally”: exploring microaggression towards LGBTQIA+ employees in Indian workplaces From mandate to co-create: leading the development of inclusive performance evaluation criteria Leader responses to a pandemic: the interaction of leader gender and country collectivism predicting pandemic deaths Do dominant groups respond negatively to diversity policies? The impact of modern racism beliefs on organizational citizenship behavior intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1