Diverse perspectives on remote collaborative care for chronic disease management

Seo Yeon Baik, Hakyoung Park, Jiwon Shinn, Hun‐Sung Kim
{"title":"Diverse perspectives on remote collaborative care for chronic disease management","authors":"Seo Yeon Baik, Hakyoung Park, Jiwon Shinn, Hun‐Sung Kim","doi":"10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote collaborative care is a program that improves medical services by linking local and remote physicians with residents in areas where access to medical facilities is limited, utilizing information and communication technology. As a result, patients can obtain medical advice and counseling at local hospitals without needing to travel to distant facilities. This care model involves communication between doctors, facilitating the accurate transfer of medical information and reducing the risk of misunderstandings. For instance, managing conditions such as blood pressure or blood glucose is more straightforward because a local hospital can assess the patient's status while a remote hospital simultaneously provides high-quality, specialized medical services. With the rise in poorly controlled hypertension or diabetes, the need for remote collaborative care has also increased. This care model enables local hospitals to maintain continuous patient care with the support of remote facilities. This is particularly true following acute cardiovascular treatment, where local hospitals, assisted by remote institutions, can safely offer high-quality services such as rehabilitation and follow-up care. Although remote hospitals have many advantages with the increasing number of patients, many difficulties remain in commercializing unsystematized remote collaborative care. Specifically, low reimbursements for medical services must be addressed, proper equipment is needed, more time and effort must be invested, and the liability issue must also be dealt with. Nevertheless, remote collaborative care using information and communication technology will be necessary in the future. Medical staff need to objectively examine the advantages and disadvantages of remote collaborative care from various perspectives and find ways to revitalize it.","PeriodicalId":348697,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Prevention and Pharmacotherapy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Prevention and Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote collaborative care is a program that improves medical services by linking local and remote physicians with residents in areas where access to medical facilities is limited, utilizing information and communication technology. As a result, patients can obtain medical advice and counseling at local hospitals without needing to travel to distant facilities. This care model involves communication between doctors, facilitating the accurate transfer of medical information and reducing the risk of misunderstandings. For instance, managing conditions such as blood pressure or blood glucose is more straightforward because a local hospital can assess the patient's status while a remote hospital simultaneously provides high-quality, specialized medical services. With the rise in poorly controlled hypertension or diabetes, the need for remote collaborative care has also increased. This care model enables local hospitals to maintain continuous patient care with the support of remote facilities. This is particularly true following acute cardiovascular treatment, where local hospitals, assisted by remote institutions, can safely offer high-quality services such as rehabilitation and follow-up care. Although remote hospitals have many advantages with the increasing number of patients, many difficulties remain in commercializing unsystematized remote collaborative care. Specifically, low reimbursements for medical services must be addressed, proper equipment is needed, more time and effort must be invested, and the liability issue must also be dealt with. Nevertheless, remote collaborative care using information and communication technology will be necessary in the future. Medical staff need to objectively examine the advantages and disadvantages of remote collaborative care from various perspectives and find ways to revitalize it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于慢性病管理远程协作护理的不同观点
远程协作医疗是一项利用信息和通信技术,将当地和远程医生与医疗设施有限地区的居民联系起来,从而改善医疗服务的计划。这样,患者就可以在当地医院获得医疗建议和咨询,而无需前往遥远的医疗机构。这种医疗模式涉及医生之间的沟通,有利于准确传递医疗信息,减少误解的风险。例如,血压或血糖等疾病的管理更加简单,因为当地医院可以评估病人的状况,而远程医院则同时提供高质量的专业医疗服务。随着控制不佳的高血压或糖尿病患者增多,对远程协作医疗的需求也在增加。这种护理模式使本地医院能够在远程设施的支持下保持对病人的持续护理。尤其是在急性心血管病治疗后,本地医院在远程机构的协助下,可以安全地提供高质量的服务,如康复和后续护理。虽然随着病人数量的增加,远程医院具有许多优势,但在实现非系统化远程协作医疗的商业化方面仍存在许多困难。具体来说,必须解决医疗服务补偿低的问题,需要适当的设备,必须投入更多的时间和精力,还必须解决责任问题。尽管如此,利用信息和通信技术开展远程协作医疗在未来仍是必要的。医务人员需要从不同角度客观审视远程协作医疗的利弊,并找到振兴远程协作医疗的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac rehabilitation using intensive lifestyle habituation combined with outdoor exercise in an urban forest environment for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a feasibility test Changes in cardiovascular-related health behaviors after the end of social distancing: the 2023 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Awareness Survey Diverse perspectives on remote collaborative care for chronic disease management Current status of remote collaborative care for hypertension in medically underserved areas Recent evidence on target blood pressure in patients with hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1