Surgical Treatment for Primary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

M. Gaxiola-García, Joseph M. Escandón, O. Manrique, Kristin A. Skinner, Beatriz Hatsue Kushida Contreras
{"title":"Surgical Treatment for Primary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"M. Gaxiola-García, Joseph M. Escandón, O. Manrique, Kristin A. Skinner, Beatriz Hatsue Kushida Contreras","doi":"10.1055/a-2253-9859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Retrospective review of surgical management for primary lymphedema.\nMethods: Data were extracted from 55 articles from PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane CENTRAL between the data base inception and December 2022 to evaluate the outcomes of lympho-venous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and outcomes of soft tissue extirpative procedures such as suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and extensive soft tissue excision.\nResults: \nData from 485 patients were compiled; these were treated with LVA (n=177), VLNT (n=82), SAL (102), and excisional procedures (n=124). Improvement of the lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) index, the quality of life, and lymphedema symptoms were reported in most studies. LVA and VLNT led to symptomatic relief and improved quality of life, reaching up to 90% and 61% average circumference reduction, respectively. Cellulitis reduction was reported in 25% and 40% of LVA and VLNT papers, respectively. The extirpative procedures, used mainly in patients with advanced disease, also led to clinical improvement from the volume reduction, as well as reduced incidence of cellulitis, although with poor cosmetic results; 87.5% of these reports recommended postoperative compression garments. The overall complication rates were: 1% for LVA, 13% for VLNT, 11% for SAL, and 46% for extirpative procedures. Altogether, only one paper lacked some kind of improvement.\nConclusions: \nPrimary lymphedema is amenable to surgical treatment; the currently performed procedures have effectively improved symptoms and quality of life in this population. Complication rates are related to the invasiveness of the chosen procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2253-9859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Retrospective review of surgical management for primary lymphedema. Methods: Data were extracted from 55 articles from PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane CENTRAL between the data base inception and December 2022 to evaluate the outcomes of lympho-venous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and outcomes of soft tissue extirpative procedures such as suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and extensive soft tissue excision. Results: Data from 485 patients were compiled; these were treated with LVA (n=177), VLNT (n=82), SAL (102), and excisional procedures (n=124). Improvement of the lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) index, the quality of life, and lymphedema symptoms were reported in most studies. LVA and VLNT led to symptomatic relief and improved quality of life, reaching up to 90% and 61% average circumference reduction, respectively. Cellulitis reduction was reported in 25% and 40% of LVA and VLNT papers, respectively. The extirpative procedures, used mainly in patients with advanced disease, also led to clinical improvement from the volume reduction, as well as reduced incidence of cellulitis, although with poor cosmetic results; 87.5% of these reports recommended postoperative compression garments. The overall complication rates were: 1% for LVA, 13% for VLNT, 11% for SAL, and 46% for extirpative procedures. Altogether, only one paper lacked some kind of improvement. Conclusions: Primary lymphedema is amenable to surgical treatment; the currently performed procedures have effectively improved symptoms and quality of life in this population. Complication rates are related to the invasiveness of the chosen procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性淋巴水肿的手术治疗:文献系统性综述。
目的:对原发性淋巴水肿的手术治疗进行回顾性研究:回顾性分析原发性淋巴水肿的手术治疗方法:从数据库建立至 2022 年 12 月期间的 PubMed MEDLINE、Web of Science、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 的 55 篇文章中提取数据,评估淋巴-静脉吻合术(LVA)和血管化淋巴结转移术(VLNT)的疗效,以及抽吸辅助淋巴结切除术(SAL)和广泛软组织切除术等软组织切除术的疗效:结果:共收集了485名患者的数据,这些患者分别接受了LVA(177人)、VLNT(82人)、SAL(102人)和切除术(124人)治疗。大多数研究都报告了下肢淋巴水肿(LEL)指数、生活质量和淋巴水肿症状的改善情况。LVA和VLNT可缓解症状并改善生活质量,平均周径缩小率分别高达90%和61%。在 LVA 和 VLNT 论文中,分别有 25% 和 40% 的研究报告称蜂窝组织炎有所缓解。切除术主要用于晚期患者,也能通过缩小体积改善临床症状,并降低蜂窝织炎的发病率,但外观效果不佳;87.5%的报告建议术后穿弹力服。总的并发症发生率为LVA为1%,VLNT为13%,SAL为11%,切除术为46%。总之,只有一篇论文缺乏某种改善:结论:原发性淋巴水肿适合手术治疗;目前实施的手术有效地改善了这一人群的症状和生活质量。并发症发生率与所选手术的侵入性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Guidelines and Technical Tips for Neck Aesthetics with Botulinum Toxin Comparison of Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap on Radiation-induced Peri-implant Capsular Contracture in a Rabbit Model Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview Case series and literature review of up-to-date surgical management of occipital neuralgia Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1