Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula outflow stenosis caused by venous valve

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1159/000536309
Bo Chen, Ling Chen, Qiao Yang, Xue-jing Gao, Qi-quan Lai, B. Tu, Ziming Wan
{"title":"Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula outflow stenosis caused by venous valve","authors":"Bo Chen, Ling Chen, Qiao Yang, Xue-jing Gao, Qi-quan Lai, B. Tu, Ziming Wan","doi":"10.1159/000536309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Venous valve–related stenosis (VVRS) is an uncommon type of failure of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There is a paucity of data on the long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for VVRS.\nMethods: ESRD patients who underwent PTA because of VVRS between January 2017 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled. Patients were classified into three cohorts (cohort1, VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis; cohort2, VVRS located over 3 cm away from the anastomosis; cohort3, multiple stenoses). The patency rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the risk factors.\nResults: A total of 292 patients were enrolled, including 125 (42.8%), 111 (38.0%), and 56 (19.2%) patients in cohort1, cohort2 and cohort3, respectively. The median follow-up was 34.8 months. The 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year primary patency rates were 86.0%, 69.4%, 47.5%, and 35.3%, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 94.5%, 89.4%, 75.5%, and 65.3%, respectively. Cohort1 showed a relatively better primary patency compared to cohort2 and cohort3. The secondary patency rates were comparable in the three cohorts. Duration of dialysis and VVRS type were potential factors associated with primary patency.\nConclusions: This study showed acceptable long-term primary and secondary patency rates after PTA for VVRS in ESRD patients, especially for those with VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis.\n","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Venous valve–related stenosis (VVRS) is an uncommon type of failure of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There is a paucity of data on the long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for VVRS. Methods: ESRD patients who underwent PTA because of VVRS between January 2017 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled. Patients were classified into three cohorts (cohort1, VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis; cohort2, VVRS located over 3 cm away from the anastomosis; cohort3, multiple stenoses). The patency rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the risk factors. Results: A total of 292 patients were enrolled, including 125 (42.8%), 111 (38.0%), and 56 (19.2%) patients in cohort1, cohort2 and cohort3, respectively. The median follow-up was 34.8 months. The 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year primary patency rates were 86.0%, 69.4%, 47.5%, and 35.3%, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 94.5%, 89.4%, 75.5%, and 65.3%, respectively. Cohort1 showed a relatively better primary patency compared to cohort2 and cohort3. The secondary patency rates were comparable in the three cohorts. Duration of dialysis and VVRS type were potential factors associated with primary patency. Conclusions: This study showed acceptable long-term primary and secondary patency rates after PTA for VVRS in ESRD patients, especially for those with VVRS located within 3 cm of the vein adjacent to the anastomosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经皮腔内血管成形术治疗静脉瓣膜引起的动静脉瘘流出道狭窄的长期疗效
导言:静脉瓣膜相关性狭窄(VVRS)是终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中一种不常见的动静脉瘘(AVF)失败类型。有关超声引导下经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗 VVRS 的长期疗效的数据很少:纳入2017年1月至2021年12月期间在重庆医科大学附属第一医院因VVRS接受PTA治疗的ESRD患者。患者被分为三个队列(队列1,VVRS位于吻合口附近静脉3厘米以内;队列2,VVRS位于吻合口3厘米以上;队列3,多处狭窄)。通畅率采用卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)法进行评估,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。为确定风险因素,进行了单变量和多变量考克斯分析:共有 292 例患者入组,其中队列 1、队列 2 和队列 3 分别有 125 例(42.8%)、111 例(38.0%)和 56 例(19.2%)患者。中位随访时间为 34.8 个月。6个月、1年、2年和3年一次通畅率分别为86.0%、69.4%、47.5%和35.3%。二次通畅率分别为 94.5%、89.4%、75.5% 和 65.3%。与队列 2 和队列 3 相比,队列 1 的初次通畅率相对较高。三个队列的二次通畅率相当。透析时间和 VVRS 类型是与一次通畅率相关的潜在因素:本研究显示,ESRD 患者在对 VVRS 进行 PTA 治疗后,其长期一次和二次通畅率均可接受,尤其是那些 VVRS 位于吻合口附近静脉 3 厘米以内的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1