The Current Regulatory Environment for Software Used in Medical Devices: A Need for Refined International Strategies

N. S. Patil, Animesh Ranjan, Gaurav, Amandeep Singh
{"title":"The Current Regulatory Environment for Software Used in Medical Devices: A Need for Refined International Strategies","authors":"N. S. Patil, Animesh Ranjan, Gaurav, Amandeep Singh","doi":"10.2174/0126673371279532240102113651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIn the fast-evolving landscape of healthcare technology, Software as a Medical Device\n(SaMD) has emerged as a transformative force, redefining how medical functionalities are delivered\nand accessed. From diagnostic algorithms to treatment monitoring applications, SaMD\nhas ushered in a new era of innovation and patient care[1]. As this field continues to burgeon,\nregulatory frameworks play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of these\ndigital health solutions[2]. In this editorial, we delve into the dynamic regulatory landscape\nof SaMD in both the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations and the United States (US), exploring the\nnuances and challenges that underscore the need for more refined strategies. By examining the regulatory intricacies and aligning\nthem with technological advancements, we aim to shed light on the imperative of adaptive regulatory approaches that can\nharness the full potential of SaMD while safeguarding public health. A remarkable role of \"software as a medical device\"\n(SaMD) in contemporary healthcare software that is intended to be used for medical purposes but is not a component of a\nhardware medical device is referred to as \"software as a medical device\" (SaMD)[3]. SaMD is essential to contemporary\nhealthcare since it makes it possible to use software applications for a variety of medical functions, diagnoses, treatments, and\nmonitoring [4].\n","PeriodicalId":72255,"journal":{"name":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126673371279532240102113651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the fast-evolving landscape of healthcare technology, Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) has emerged as a transformative force, redefining how medical functionalities are delivered and accessed. From diagnostic algorithms to treatment monitoring applications, SaMD has ushered in a new era of innovation and patient care[1]. As this field continues to burgeon, regulatory frameworks play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of these digital health solutions[2]. In this editorial, we delve into the dynamic regulatory landscape of SaMD in both the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations and the United States (US), exploring the nuances and challenges that underscore the need for more refined strategies. By examining the regulatory intricacies and aligning them with technological advancements, we aim to shed light on the imperative of adaptive regulatory approaches that can harness the full potential of SaMD while safeguarding public health. A remarkable role of "software as a medical device" (SaMD) in contemporary healthcare software that is intended to be used for medical purposes but is not a component of a hardware medical device is referred to as "software as a medical device" (SaMD)[3]. SaMD is essential to contemporary healthcare since it makes it possible to use software applications for a variety of medical functions, diagnoses, treatments, and monitoring [4].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前医疗器械所用软件的监管环境:完善国际战略的必要性
在快速发展的医疗保健技术领域,软件即医疗设备(SaMD)已成为一股变革力量,重新定义了医疗功能的交付和获取方式。从诊断算法到治疗监测应用,SaMD 开启了创新和患者护理的新时代[1]。随着这一领域的不断发展,监管框架在确保数字医疗解决方案的安全性、有效性和可靠性方面发挥着举足轻重的作用[2]。在这篇社论中,我们将深入探讨金砖五国(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)和美国在 SaMD 方面的动态监管情况,探讨当时的机遇和挑战,这些机遇和挑战凸显了制定更完善战略的必要性。通过研究错综复杂的监管问题并将其与技术进步相结合,我们旨在阐明适应性监管方法的必要性,这种方法既能充分发挥大规模毁灭性武器的潜力,又能保障公众健康。软件作为医疗设备"(SaMD) 在当代医疗保健软件中发挥着重要作用,这些软件旨在用于医疗目的,但并非硬件医疗设备的组成部分,因此被称为 "软件作为医疗设备"(SaMD)[3]。SaMD 对当代医疗保健至关重要,因为它使软件应用程序用于各种医疗功能、诊断、治疗和监测成为可能[4]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Regulatory Compliance within the Pharmaceutical Industry Regulation of Nanomaterials and Nanomedicines for Clinical Application Qualitative Analysis and Anti-oxidant Potential of Ethanolic Extract of Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen Leaves The Current Regulatory Environment for Software Used in Medical Devices: A Need for Refined International Strategies A comparative study on approval of follow-on version of Sevelamer Carbonate and Glatiramer Acetate (GA) in US, EU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1