Baricitinib statistically significantly reduced COVID-19 related mortality: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis of five phase III randomised, blinded and placebo controlled clinical trials

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpae002
Sivananthan Manoharan, Lee Ying Ying
{"title":"Baricitinib statistically significantly reduced COVID-19 related mortality: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis of five phase III randomised, blinded and placebo controlled clinical trials","authors":"Sivananthan Manoharan, Lee Ying Ying","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Due to high heterogeneity and risk of bias (RoB) found in previously published meta-analysis, a concrete conclusion on the efficacy of baricitinib in reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients was unable to form. Hence, this systematic-review and meta-analysis was conducted to analyse whether RoB, heterogeneity and optimal sample size from placebo controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are still the problems to derive a concrete conclusion.\n \n \n \n Search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and other sources like preprints and reference lists were searched with appropriate keywords. The RoB and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4. The grading of the articles was conducted using the GRADEPro Guideline Development Tool.\n \n \n \n Ten (10) RCTs were included in the current systematic-review. Only 5 low RoB articles are Phase III placebo controlled RCTs with high certainty level based on the GRADE grading system. For meta-analysis, based on 5 low RoB articles, baricitinib statistically significantly reduced mortality where the risk ratio (RR) = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85]. The absolute mortality effect (95% CI) based on the grading system was 35 fewer mortalities per 1000 COVID-19 patients where in the baricitinib and control groups the mortality was 7.4% and 10.9%, respectively.\n \n \n \n With the presence of optimal sample size of 3944 from 5 low RoB-placebo controlled RCTs which represent a minimum of 300 million population of people and with the presence of 0% of heterogeneity from meta-analysis, the effectiveness of baricitinib in reducing the mortality in COVID-19 patients is concretely proven.\n","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to high heterogeneity and risk of bias (RoB) found in previously published meta-analysis, a concrete conclusion on the efficacy of baricitinib in reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients was unable to form. Hence, this systematic-review and meta-analysis was conducted to analyse whether RoB, heterogeneity and optimal sample size from placebo controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are still the problems to derive a concrete conclusion. Search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and other sources like preprints and reference lists were searched with appropriate keywords. The RoB and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4. The grading of the articles was conducted using the GRADEPro Guideline Development Tool. Ten (10) RCTs were included in the current systematic-review. Only 5 low RoB articles are Phase III placebo controlled RCTs with high certainty level based on the GRADE grading system. For meta-analysis, based on 5 low RoB articles, baricitinib statistically significantly reduced mortality where the risk ratio (RR) = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85]. The absolute mortality effect (95% CI) based on the grading system was 35 fewer mortalities per 1000 COVID-19 patients where in the baricitinib and control groups the mortality was 7.4% and 10.9%, respectively. With the presence of optimal sample size of 3944 from 5 low RoB-placebo controlled RCTs which represent a minimum of 300 million population of people and with the presence of 0% of heterogeneity from meta-analysis, the effectiveness of baricitinib in reducing the mortality in COVID-19 patients is concretely proven.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴利替尼显著降低了与COVID-19相关的死亡率:对五项III期随机、盲法和安慰剂对照临床试验的系统回顾和Meta分析
由于之前发表的荟萃分析中发现的高度异质性和偏倚风险(RoB),巴利昔替尼在降低COVID-19患者死亡率方面的疗效无法形成具体结论。因此,本系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在分析安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)中的RoB、异质性和最佳样本量是否仍是得出具体结论的问题所在。 研究人员使用适当的关键词搜索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、ScienceDirect 等搜索引擎以及预印本和参考文献目录等其他来源。使用RevMan 5.4进行RoB和荟萃分析。使用 GRADEPro 指南开发工具对文章进行了分级。 本次系统综述共纳入十(10)项 RCT。根据 GRADE 分级系统,只有 5 篇低 RoB 文章是具有高确定性的 III 期安慰剂对照 RCT。在荟萃分析中,基于 5 篇低 RoB 文章,巴利昔尼显著降低了死亡率,风险比 (RR) = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85]。根据分级系统得出的绝对死亡率效应(95% CI)为每1000例COVID-19患者减少35例死亡,其中巴利昔尼组和对照组的死亡率分别为7.4%和10.9%。 5项低RoB-安慰剂对照RCT的最佳样本量为3944个,代表了至少3亿人口,荟萃分析的异质性为0%,因此巴利昔尼在降低COVID-19患者死亡率方面的有效性得到了具体证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Western blotting immunodetection: Streamlining antibody cocktails for reduced protocol time and enhanced multiplexing applications. Live cell fluorescence microscopy-an end-to-end workflow for high-throughput image and data analysis. A reproducible method to study traumatic injury-induced zebrafish brain regeneration. Cluster analysis identifies long COVID subtypes in Belgian patients. Unpacking unstructured data: A pilot study on extracting insights from neuropathological reports of Parkinson's Disease patients using large language models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1