Clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis in bovines affected by perforated abomasal ulcers and with comorbities

Q4 Veterinary Acta Veterinaria Brasilica Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.21708/avb.2023.17.3.11731
Adony Querubino de Andrade Neto, José Ricardo Barboza Silva, Carla Lopes de Mendonça, Rodolfo José Cavalcanti Souto, Lilian Rose Marquez de Sá, José Augusto Bastos Afonso
{"title":"Clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis in bovines affected by perforated abomasal ulcers and with comorbities","authors":"Adony Querubino de Andrade Neto, José Ricardo Barboza Silva, Carla Lopes de Mendonça, Rodolfo José Cavalcanti Souto, Lilian Rose Marquez de Sá, José Augusto Bastos Afonso","doi":"10.21708/avb.2023.17.3.11731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study describes the findings of the clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis in cattle affected by perforated abomasal ulcers and with comorbidities. Twenty-five cattle were evaluated, young (n=8, aged less than two years) and adults (n=17, aged greater than two and a half years), diagnosed with perforated abomasal ulcers. Epidemiological information was retrieved from the medical records. Blood, ruminal fluid, and peritoneal fluid (PI) samples were collected for laboratory examination. Ultrasound examination, exploratory laparotomy, and post mortem examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes. The main clinical findings of perforated ulcers in the present study were: apathy, dehydration, intestinal hypomotility, diarrheal stools, hypomotile or atonic rumen, tachycardia, tachypnea, abdominal distention with bilateral bulging, and increased abdominal tension. The most frequent abnormal hematological findings were hypoproteinemia and neutrophilic leukocytosis with a left shift. The peritoneal fluid (PL) showed an inflammatory reaction in the cytology, characteristic of an exudate. A confirmatory diagnosis of peritonitis by ultrasonography was possible in five cases, and in two cases at exploratory laparotomy. In the post mortem examination, the ulcers were characterized as type 3, 4, or 5, with comorbidities present in 68% of the cases. It is necessary to combine ultrasonography with abdominal centesis and exploratory laparotomy procedures to suggest perforated ulcers. However, post mortem examination better characterizes the type of perforated ulcer present, particularly type 5.","PeriodicalId":38626,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2023.17.3.11731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes the findings of the clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis in cattle affected by perforated abomasal ulcers and with comorbidities. Twenty-five cattle were evaluated, young (n=8, aged less than two years) and adults (n=17, aged greater than two and a half years), diagnosed with perforated abomasal ulcers. Epidemiological information was retrieved from the medical records. Blood, ruminal fluid, and peritoneal fluid (PI) samples were collected for laboratory examination. Ultrasound examination, exploratory laparotomy, and post mortem examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes. The main clinical findings of perforated ulcers in the present study were: apathy, dehydration, intestinal hypomotility, diarrheal stools, hypomotile or atonic rumen, tachycardia, tachypnea, abdominal distention with bilateral bulging, and increased abdominal tension. The most frequent abnormal hematological findings were hypoproteinemia and neutrophilic leukocytosis with a left shift. The peritoneal fluid (PL) showed an inflammatory reaction in the cytology, characteristic of an exudate. A confirmatory diagnosis of peritonitis by ultrasonography was possible in five cases, and in two cases at exploratory laparotomy. In the post mortem examination, the ulcers were characterized as type 3, 4, or 5, with comorbidities present in 68% of the cases. It is necessary to combine ultrasonography with abdominal centesis and exploratory laparotomy procedures to suggest perforated ulcers. However, post mortem examination better characterizes the type of perforated ulcer present, particularly type 5.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有腹腔溃疡穿孔和合并症的牛的临床和解剖病理诊断
本研究描述了对患有穿孔性腹腔溃疡和合并症的牛进行临床和解剖病理学诊断的结果。研究人员对 25 头牛进行了评估,其中有幼牛(8 头,年龄小于两岁)和成年牛(17 头,年龄大于两岁半),它们都被诊断为腹腔溃疡穿孔。流行病学信息来自医疗记录。采集血液、瘤胃液和腹腔液(PI)样本进行实验室检查。为诊断目的进行了超声波检查、剖腹探查术和尸检。在本研究中,穿孔性溃疡的主要临床表现为:冷漠、脱水、肠道蠕动减弱、腹泻便、瘤胃蠕动减弱或失张力、心动过速、呼吸过速、腹胀伴双侧膨隆、腹肌张力增高。最常见的血液学异常是低蛋白血症和中性粒细胞白细胞增多并左移。腹腔积液(PL)的细胞学检查显示出炎症反应,具有渗出物的特征。有五例病例可通过超声波检查确诊为腹膜炎,有两例病例可通过剖腹探查术确诊。在尸检中,溃疡的特征为 3、4 或 5 型,68% 的病例存在合并症。有必要将超声波检查与腹腔穿刺术和剖腹探查术结合起来,以提示溃疡穿孔。然而,尸检更能确定穿孔溃疡的类型,尤其是第 5 型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Brasilica
Acta Veterinaria Brasilica Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison between official methods and ultrasound spectroscopy used to determine the physicochemical features of raw milk Naturally acquired diarrhea in calves from birth to 25 days of age: incidence, clinical Signs, and response to treatment Equine Rhinosporidiosis: a case report in brazilian midwestern Clinical and anatomopathological diagnosis in bovines affected by perforated abomasal ulcers and with comorbities Incidence of subclinical ketosis in dairy cows in the semi-arid region of the state of Paraíba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1