Treatment Response of Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Mahmud Abdulkadir Magashi, Huazhong Cai, Z. Shaibu
{"title":"Treatment Response of Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Mahmud Abdulkadir Magashi, Huazhong Cai, Z. Shaibu","doi":"10.52403/ijshr.20240106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to its dismal survival rates and limited treatment choices, pancreatic cancer (PC) continues to be one of the most difficult and aggressive cancers in the world. The potential of immunotherapy (IT) in treating different forms of cancer has led to research on how effective it is in treating advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).\nAims: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of IT in conjunction with chemotherapy for the management of APC.\nMethod: Using electronic databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, a thorough literature search was carried out to find pertinent papers published up until March 20, 2023. Research on the effectiveness and safety of IT in conjunction with chemotherapy for APC were included. The Review manager 5.4.1 was used to conducted an analysis of the included studies.\nResults: The odd ratio of the stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.95–1.57), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61–1.00), respectively, indicating that there was no significant difference between IT plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Also, the partial response (PR) of the IT plus chemotherapy did not differ from chemotherapy alone. The odd ratio of partial response was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.80–1.79).\nConclusion: It can be concluded that there was no significant difference in the rates of SD, PD, or PR between the treatment of IT combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in APC patients. This indicates that the outcomes were similar between the two treatment approaches. However, it is important to note that further analysis and consideration of the full study data are necessary to validate this conclusion.\n\nKeywords: Advanced pancreas cancer, adenocarcinoma, Immunotherapy, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Chemotherapy","PeriodicalId":14300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","volume":"71 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20240106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to its dismal survival rates and limited treatment choices, pancreatic cancer (PC) continues to be one of the most difficult and aggressive cancers in the world. The potential of immunotherapy (IT) in treating different forms of cancer has led to research on how effective it is in treating advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Aims: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of IT in conjunction with chemotherapy for the management of APC. Method: Using electronic databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, a thorough literature search was carried out to find pertinent papers published up until March 20, 2023. Research on the effectiveness and safety of IT in conjunction with chemotherapy for APC were included. The Review manager 5.4.1 was used to conducted an analysis of the included studies. Results: The odd ratio of the stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.95–1.57), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61–1.00), respectively, indicating that there was no significant difference between IT plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Also, the partial response (PR) of the IT plus chemotherapy did not differ from chemotherapy alone. The odd ratio of partial response was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.80–1.79). Conclusion: It can be concluded that there was no significant difference in the rates of SD, PD, or PR between the treatment of IT combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in APC patients. This indicates that the outcomes were similar between the two treatment approaches. However, it is important to note that further analysis and consideration of the full study data are necessary to validate this conclusion. Keywords: Advanced pancreas cancer, adenocarcinoma, Immunotherapy, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Chemotherapy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫疗法联合化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效:一项 Meta 分析
背景:由于胰腺癌(PC)的生存率低且治疗选择有限,因此它仍然是世界上最难治愈且最具侵袭性的癌症之一。免疫疗法(IT)在治疗不同形式癌症方面的潜力促使人们对其治疗晚期胰腺癌(APC)的效果进行研究。目的:本荟萃分析的目的是评估 IT 与化疗联合治疗 APC 的疗效:方法:利用PubMed和谷歌学术等电子数据库,对截至2023年3月20日发表的相关文献进行全面检索。其中包括有关 IT 与化疗联合治疗 APC 的有效性和安全性的研究。研究结果显示,稳定疾病患者的奇数比(1:1)高于化疗患者的奇数比(1:1):稳定期疾病(SD)和进展期疾病(PD)的奇数比分别为1.22(95% CI:0.95-1.57)和0.78(95% CI:0.61-1.00),表明IT联合化疗与单纯化疗无显著差异。此外,IT+化疗的部分反应(PR)与单纯化疗没有差异。部分反应的奇数比为 1.19(95% CI:0.80-1.79):可以得出结论:在 APC 患者中,IT 联合化疗与单独化疗的 SD、PD 或 PR 率没有明显差异。这表明两种治疗方法的疗效相似。但需要注意的是,要验证这一结论,还需要进一步分析和考虑全部研究数据:晚期胰腺癌 腺癌 免疫疗法 免疫检查点抑制剂 化疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation: A Prosthodontic Driven Approach: A Review The Dopamine Hypothesis as a Causal Explanation of Schizophrenia Effect of 4-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Dyspnea, Fatigue, Quality of Life and Radiological Findings in a Patient with Pulmonary Renal Syndrome Suffering from Pneumonia - A Case Study Characteristics of Corneal Ulcer Patients at Bali Mandara Eye Hospital in 2021-2022 Awareness of Preventive Measures in Osteoarthritis Among Urban Population in Pune City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1