Science students develop multiple employability literacies from large, early-year courses without employability modules

Lauren Carpenter, Sophie Hubbard, Nicole Scout Basinski, Susan Rowland
{"title":"Science students develop multiple employability literacies from large, early-year courses without employability modules","authors":"Lauren Carpenter, Sophie Hubbard, Nicole Scout Basinski, Susan Rowland","doi":"10.21153/jtlge2024vol15no1art1717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns have been raised about the employability of Science graduates, however undergraduate Science curricula rarely focus on building employability. Our goal is to harness existing Science-focused curricula to improve Science graduate employability. In this study we asked whether students could identify learning of employability literacies from their experiences in undergraduate Science courses that do not explicitly teach employability literacies. To address these questions, we employed a short reflective activity in three large first year courses; these courses focused on scientific content and processes, and did not include employability modules. We asked students to choose an employability literacy from a menu and describe how components of the course prompted them to develop this literacy. Students chose a wide variety of literacies and linked their development to multiple aspects of their course experience. They also consistently indicated they had achieved multiple literacies from their course. Course coordinators highlighted the strength-based quality of the reflections, which differed from the usual course evaluation comments given by students. Coordinators who used the reflection activity in the first year were eager to continue in subsequent semesters and years. This mechanism gives students and staff the opportunity to understand the wide and varied opportunities for employability skill development that already exist in undergraduate Science courses. The approach does not require course teaching amendments or student skill-building instruction. This study shows that students can achieve multiple employability literacies from early-year courses, and raises new possibilities around how we can boost students’ understanding and development of their employability.","PeriodicalId":502949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2024vol15no1art1717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns have been raised about the employability of Science graduates, however undergraduate Science curricula rarely focus on building employability. Our goal is to harness existing Science-focused curricula to improve Science graduate employability. In this study we asked whether students could identify learning of employability literacies from their experiences in undergraduate Science courses that do not explicitly teach employability literacies. To address these questions, we employed a short reflective activity in three large first year courses; these courses focused on scientific content and processes, and did not include employability modules. We asked students to choose an employability literacy from a menu and describe how components of the course prompted them to develop this literacy. Students chose a wide variety of literacies and linked their development to multiple aspects of their course experience. They also consistently indicated they had achieved multiple literacies from their course. Course coordinators highlighted the strength-based quality of the reflections, which differed from the usual course evaluation comments given by students. Coordinators who used the reflection activity in the first year were eager to continue in subsequent semesters and years. This mechanism gives students and staff the opportunity to understand the wide and varied opportunities for employability skill development that already exist in undergraduate Science courses. The approach does not require course teaching amendments or student skill-building instruction. This study shows that students can achieve multiple employability literacies from early-year courses, and raises new possibilities around how we can boost students’ understanding and development of their employability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理科学生从没有就业能力模块的大型低年级课程中培养多种就业能力素养
理科毕业生的就业能力一直备受关注,但理科本科课程却很少关注就业能力的培养。我们的目标是利用现有的理科课程来提高理科毕业生的就业能力。在本研究中,我们询问学生是否能从他们在没有明确教授就业能力素养的理科本科课程中学习到就业能力素养。为了解决这些问题,我们在三门大一课程中采用了简短的反思活动;这些课程侧重于科学内容和过程,并不包括就业能力模块。我们要求学生从菜单中选择一种就业能力素养,并描述课程内容是如何促使他们发展这种素养的。学生们选择了各种各样的素养,并将这些素养的培养与课程体验的多个方面联系起来。他们还一致表示从课程中获得了多种素养。课程协调人强调了反思的优势质量,这与学生通常给出的课程评价意见不同。第一年使用反思活动的协调人渴望在以后的学期和学年继续使用。这一机制让学生和教职员工有机会了解本科理科课程中已经存在的广泛而多样的就业能力技能培养机会。这种方法不需要对课程教学进行修改,也不需要对学生的技能培养进行指导。这项研究表明,学生可以从低年级课程中获得多种就业能力素养,并为我们如何促进学生对自身就业能力的理解和发展提出了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science students develop multiple employability literacies from large, early-year courses without employability modules Predicting students’ work world awareness through their readiness and competency for the digital world The effects of trainers’ competence on employability of government polytechnic college graduates in Dire Dawa City, east-central Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1