Abigail M. Folberg, Laura Brooks Dueland, Matthew Swanson, Sarah Stepanek, Mikki Hebl, Carey S. Ryan
{"title":"Racism underlies seemingly race-neutral conservative criticisms of DEI statements among Black and White people in the United States","authors":"Abigail M. Folberg, Laura Brooks Dueland, Matthew Swanson, Sarah Stepanek, Mikki Hebl, Carey S. Ryan","doi":"10.1111/joop.12491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined how potential job candidates react to a hiring organization that requests diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements, which conservatives in the United States and elsewhere have criticized as being unrelated to job function and inappropriately political or ideological. Across three studies (two of which were pre-registered), we compared reactions to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork or conservative values) statements as a function of race (Black vs. White), political conservatism and symbolic racism (Total <i>N</i> = 1108). When a DEI (vs. teamwork or politically conservative values) statement was requested, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative perceived the organization as less just, expressed less interest in the job, and expected poorer person-organization fit, even when a job-related rationale was provided. Further, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative evaluated a request for a statement consistent with conservative values more favourably. Thus, criticisms that DEI statements are overly political are not applied to other statements that might elicit similar concerns. Moreover, an internal meta-analysis suggested that the relationships of conservatism to justice and interest (but not person-organization fit) in response to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork) statements were not independent of racism. Findings were consistent with social dominance theory; racism may underlie seemingly race-neutral backlash to DEI statements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 3","pages":"791-816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12491","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examined how potential job candidates react to a hiring organization that requests diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements, which conservatives in the United States and elsewhere have criticized as being unrelated to job function and inappropriately political or ideological. Across three studies (two of which were pre-registered), we compared reactions to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork or conservative values) statements as a function of race (Black vs. White), political conservatism and symbolic racism (Total N = 1108). When a DEI (vs. teamwork or politically conservative values) statement was requested, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative perceived the organization as less just, expressed less interest in the job, and expected poorer person-organization fit, even when a job-related rationale was provided. Further, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative evaluated a request for a statement consistent with conservative values more favourably. Thus, criticisms that DEI statements are overly political are not applied to other statements that might elicit similar concerns. Moreover, an internal meta-analysis suggested that the relationships of conservatism to justice and interest (but not person-organization fit) in response to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork) statements were not independent of racism. Findings were consistent with social dominance theory; racism may underlie seemingly race-neutral backlash to DEI statements.
我们研究了潜在求职者对用人单位要求提供多元化、公平和包容(DEI)声明的反应,美国和其他国家的保守派批评这些声明与工作职能无关,是不恰当的政治或意识形态声明。在三项研究(其中两项是预先登记的)中,我们比较了不同种族(黑人与白人)、政治保守主义和象征性种族主义(总人数 = 1108)对多元化、公平与包容(与团队合作或保守价值观)声明要求的反应。当被试者要求发表 "促进就业"(与团队合作或政治保守价值观)声明时,保守程度较高(与保守程度较低)的被试者认为组织不那么公正,对工作的兴趣较低,并预期个人与组织的匹配度较差,即使提供了与工作相关的理由也是如此。此外,保守程度较高(与保守程度较低)的受试者对要求提供与保守价值观一致的声明的评价更有利。因此,关于 DEI 声明过于政治化的批评并不适用于其他可能会引起类似担忧的声明。此外,一项内部荟萃分析表明,保守主义与正义和利益(而非个人与组织的契合度)之间的关系,在对要求提供 "发展倡议"(与团队合作)声明的回应中,并不独立于种族主义。研究结果与社会支配理论相一致;种族主义可能是貌似种族中立的对 DEI 声明的反弹的原因。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including:
- industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology
- behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations
- ergonomics and human factors
Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.