A Retrospective Study of the Dual-Main Surgeons’ Endoscopy-Assisted Insufflation Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction

Haiyan Li, Lina Wei, Ziteng Liu, Qingyu Yang, S. Lai, Ying Zhang, Zongyan Li
{"title":"A Retrospective Study of the Dual-Main Surgeons’ Endoscopy-Assisted Insufflation Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction","authors":"Haiyan Li, Lina Wei, Ziteng Liu, Qingyu Yang, S. Lai, Ying Zhang, Zongyan Li","doi":"10.60125/j.conco.2023.10.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endoscopy-assisted breast surgery (EABS) is widely accepted, especially for young breast cancer women. But single-main surgeon’s EABS (SMS-EABS) has a long operation time and lots of blood loss during the surgery. Therefore, we advocate applying dual-main surgeons’ EABS (DMS-EABS) to improve surgical technique. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 34 patients with endoscopy-assisted insufflation bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction from March 2021 to December 2023 in The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University medical database and compared the blood loss, operation time, post-operation hospital stay, implant volume, operation costs, operation complications and breast-Q questionnaire between SMS-EABS and DMS-EABS with statistical analysis. Results: The blood loss (29.38 ml vs 51.67 ml, p<0.05) and operation time (4.38 h vs 5.56 h, p=0.01) in the DMS-EABS group are significantly better than SMS-EABS. There is no statistical difference in post-operation hospital stay, implant volume, operation costs, operation complications, and aesthetic evaluation between the two groups. Conclusion: DMS-EABS has the advantage of reducing blood loss and operation time and it also keeps its aesthetic advantages as same as SMS-EABS. Therefore, it can be widely applied.","PeriodicalId":504586,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology","volume":"120 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60125/j.conco.2023.10.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopy-assisted breast surgery (EABS) is widely accepted, especially for young breast cancer women. But single-main surgeon’s EABS (SMS-EABS) has a long operation time and lots of blood loss during the surgery. Therefore, we advocate applying dual-main surgeons’ EABS (DMS-EABS) to improve surgical technique. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 34 patients with endoscopy-assisted insufflation bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction from March 2021 to December 2023 in The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University medical database and compared the blood loss, operation time, post-operation hospital stay, implant volume, operation costs, operation complications and breast-Q questionnaire between SMS-EABS and DMS-EABS with statistical analysis. Results: The blood loss (29.38 ml vs 51.67 ml, p<0.05) and operation time (4.38 h vs 5.56 h, p=0.01) in the DMS-EABS group are significantly better than SMS-EABS. There is no statistical difference in post-operation hospital stay, implant volume, operation costs, operation complications, and aesthetic evaluation between the two groups. Conclusion: DMS-EABS has the advantage of reducing blood loss and operation time and it also keeps its aesthetic advantages as same as SMS-EABS. Therefore, it can be widely applied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双主刀医生内窥镜辅助充气双侧乳头分离乳房切除术与即刻假体重建的回顾性研究
背景:内镜辅助乳腺手术(EABS)已被广泛接受,尤其是对年轻的乳腺癌女性。但单主外科医生的 EABS(SMS-EABS)手术时间长,术中失血多。因此,我们提倡应用双主刀 EABS(DMS-EABS)来改进手术技术。材料和方法:该回顾性队列研究分析了中山大学附属第六医院医学数据库中2021年3月至2023年12月期间34例内镜辅助充气双侧乳头保留乳房切除即刻假体重建术患者,并对SMS-EABS和DMS-EABS的失血量、手术时间、术后住院时间、假体植入量、手术费用、手术并发症和乳房-Q问卷进行了统计分析比较。结果显示DMS-EABS 组的失血量(29.38 毫升 vs 51.67 毫升,P<0.05)和手术时间(4.38 小时 vs 5.56 小时,P=0.01)明显优于 SMS-EABS。两组在术后住院时间、植入量、手术费用、手术并发症和美学评价方面没有统计学差异。结论DMS-EABS与SMS-EABS相比,具有减少失血量、缩短手术时间的优点,同时还保持了美观的优点。因此,它可以被广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality Assurance in RT Specific Trials: Indian Scenario Conducting a national RT-QI project – challenges and opportunities A Retrospective Study of the Dual-Main Surgeons’ Endoscopy-Assisted Insufflation Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction Urological cancer Skin cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1