The Impact of Typical School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports on Adolescent Physical Health: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Adolescent Research Review Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s40894-023-00231-x
Padraic Rocliffe, Miguel Angel Tapia-Serrano, Luis Garcia-Gonzalez, Manolis Adamakis, Liam Walsh, Aine Bannon, Emily Mulhall, Ian Sherwin, Brendan T. O’ Keeffe, Patricia Mannix-McNamara, Ciaran MacDonncha
{"title":"The Impact of Typical School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports on Adolescent Physical Health: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Padraic Rocliffe,&nbsp;Miguel Angel Tapia-Serrano,&nbsp;Luis Garcia-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Manolis Adamakis,&nbsp;Liam Walsh,&nbsp;Aine Bannon,&nbsp;Emily Mulhall,&nbsp;Ian Sherwin,&nbsp;Brendan T. O’ Keeffe,&nbsp;Patricia Mannix-McNamara,&nbsp;Ciaran MacDonncha","doi":"10.1007/s40894-023-00231-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports may impact adolescent physical health. However, systematic literature reviews and meta-analysis have not yet considered this impact. The Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, ERIC and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant literature (2000–2023) pertaining to adolescents aged 12–18 years in secondary schools. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, including twenty-three interventions, four cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies. Included studies contributed 268 reported effects on indicators of adolescent obesity, physical fitness, blood pressure and bone health. Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis and reported significantly positive effects on indicators of adiposity in experimental groups with minor modifications to typical school provision (<i>g</i> =  − 0.11 [95% CI − 0.22, − 0.01], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.04, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32.49%), in boys and girls. Subgroup analysis found significantly positive effects for body fat percentage (<i>g</i> =  − 0.28 [95% CI − 0.49, − 0.06], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Robust examples of best practice in schools include extended days dedicated to physical education weekly (≥ 4 days), integration of theoretical components to physical education, sports field/gymnasium availability and a range of training modalities. Studies without the integration of a minor modification to typical school provision were deemed to have a limited impact on adolescent physical health. Further research that examines the additive impact of school physical activity and sports to supplement physical education is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"9 4","pages":"663 - 709"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-023-00231-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-023-00231-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typical school provision of physical education, physical activity and sports may impact adolescent physical health. However, systematic literature reviews and meta-analysis have not yet considered this impact. The Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO, ERIC and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant literature (2000–2023) pertaining to adolescents aged 12–18 years in secondary schools. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, including twenty-three interventions, four cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies. Included studies contributed 268 reported effects on indicators of adolescent obesity, physical fitness, blood pressure and bone health. Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis and reported significantly positive effects on indicators of adiposity in experimental groups with minor modifications to typical school provision (g =  − 0.11 [95% CI − 0.22, − 0.01], p < 0.04, I2 = 32.49%), in boys and girls. Subgroup analysis found significantly positive effects for body fat percentage (g =  − 0.28 [95% CI − 0.49, − 0.06], p < 0.01). Robust examples of best practice in schools include extended days dedicated to physical education weekly (≥ 4 days), integration of theoretical components to physical education, sports field/gymnasium availability and a range of training modalities. Studies without the integration of a minor modification to typical school provision were deemed to have a limited impact on adolescent physical health. Further research that examines the additive impact of school physical activity and sports to supplement physical education is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校提供的典型体育教育、体育活动和运动对青少年身体健康的影响:系统文献综述和元分析
学校提供的典型体育教育、体育活动和运动可能会影响青少年的身体健康。然而,系统性文献综述和荟萃分析尚未考虑到这种影响。我们在 Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、PsychINFO、ERIC 和 MEDLINE 数据库中搜索了与 12-18 岁中学青少年有关的相关文献(2000-2023 年)。29 项研究符合纳入标准,其中包括 23 项干预措施、4 项横断面研究和 2 项纵向研究。纳入的研究中有 268 项报告了对青少年肥胖、体能、血压和骨骼健康指标的影响。有 15 项研究被纳入了荟萃分析,这些研究报告显示,在对典型学校教育稍作修改的实验组中,男孩和女孩的肥胖指标都有显著的积极影响(g = - 0.11 [95% CI - 0.22, - 0.01], p < 0.04, I2 = 32.49%)。分组分析发现,体脂百分比(g = - 0.28 [95% CI - 0.49, - 0.06],p <0.01)具有明显的积极影响。学校最佳实践的有力范例包括每周延长体育课时间(≥ 4 天)、将理论内容融入体育课、提供运动场地/健身房以及多种训练模式。没有对典型的学校体育课稍作调整的研究被认为对青少年体质健康的影响有限。有必要进一步研究学校体育活动和体育运动对体育教育的补充作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Social Media Use and Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review LGBTQ+  Youth Identity Disclosure Processes: A Systematic Review A Systematic Review of the Facilitators and Barriers to Help-Seeking for Self-Harm in Young People: A Systems Thinking Perspective Key Components and Content of Effective Evidence-Based Digital Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Umbrella Review The Role of Organized Activities in Supporting Youth Social Capital Development: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1